Answer:
a) an obese person and a thin person
Explanation:
The prints would tend to be wider for an obese person compared to a relatively thin person.
I hope this helps...
Please mark me Brainliest
How do you think John L. Sullivan felt about
Prohibition? Give an example from the passage to
support your answer. Click here.
DONE
Sullivan was in favor of Prohibition as he wanted to teach everyone about temperance and not just talk regarding aggressive boxing
What were John L. Sullivan's views on Prohibition?Prohibition was a highly controversial issue because individuals advocated for temperance and others vehemently opposing the ban on alcohol but Sullivan was known to enjoy drinking and socializing and as a celebrity figure, he likely had connections with individuals on both sides of the debate.
So, he supported the movement towards temperance and sobriety but it is also possible that he was opposed to Prohibition and viewed it as an infringement on personal freedom.
Read more about Prohibition period
brainly.com/question/14883656
#SPJ1
Suppose a lawyer exhibited a small section of a tire imprint during a trial. Why would the opposing lawyer want to see the tire impression of the entire tire and not just the one section?
The opposing lawyer want to see the tire impression of the entire tire and not just the one section because when impressions are collected it is possible that identifications can be made linking a suspect or vehicle to the crime.
Tire track imprints are regarded as pattern evidence since they leave behind a distinct pattern. Tire tracks can assist narrow down the brand, style, and size in the same way that shoe impressions do.
These imprints or impressions can be compared to a suspect's shoe or a vehicle's tire to ascertain if the shoe or tyre that left the impression is the same one that left the imprint. As shoes and tyres are worn, their physical characteristics alter. This is known as wear, and it is frequently represented in the imprint or pattern left behind.
To learn more on tire impression here:
https://brainly.com/question/21230945
#SPJ1
Bill and Aileen Turner ran Out of This World Destinations, a tour business, in Roswell, New Mexico. As their business required them to enter into numerous agreements for meals, lodging, event tickets, and other travel expenses, the Turners put a term in all their contracts requiring that disputes involving more than $500 be resolved by arbitration instead of by a court of law.
Is the term requiring arbitration enforceable? Think hard, 1-2 paragraphs.
The enforceability of the term requiring arbitration in the contracts of Out of This World Destinations depends on several factors, including state and federal law, the specific language of the arbitration clause, and the circumstances surrounding the agreement.
In general, arbitration clauses are often enforced by courts as a means of resolving disputes outside of the traditional court system. However, there are some situations where courts may find that an arbitration agreement is unenforceable, such as if there is evidence of fraud, duress, or unconscionability.
In the case of Out of This World Destinations, if the arbitration clause is deemed to be fair and reasonable, and if the parties to the contracts agreed to the term knowingly and voluntarily, then the clause may be enforceable. However, if the arbitration clause is found to be unconscionable or otherwise unfair, it may not be enforceable.
Learn more about arbitration, here:
https://brainly.com/question/24847253
#SPJ1