The controversial Kansas-Nebraska Act created the potential that slavery would be permitted in areas where it had previously been prohibited.
How did the Kansas-Nebraska act ?Its adoption heightened the acrimonious debate over slavery in the US, which would later erupt into the Civil War.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act undoubtedly contributed to growing sectionalism in Congress and the US. Between lawmakers who supported slavery in the south and those who opposed it in the north, the act ultimately led to significant rifts.
Sectionalism, not the issue of slavery, was the main reason for the American Civil War since it played a significant role in establishing the social structure and political ideologies of the South.
Learn more about Kansas-Nebraska act here
https://brainly.com/question/28330715
#SPJ1
Primary Source Analysis: Aristotle encouraged his student Alexander the Great in his conquests, telling him:
"Be a leader to the Greeks and a despot to the barbarians. Look after the former as after friends and relatives and deal with the latter as with beasts or plants."
6. From the reading, how did Aristotle believe a society should be best run? How does the above quote reveal some potential problems with his idea?
Answer:
From the reading, Aristotle believed that a society should be best run with a two-tiered system, where the Greeks were to be treated as friends and relatives and the barbarians were to be treated as beasts or plants. He encouraged his student Alexander the Great to be a leader to the Greeks and a despot to the barbarians.
The above quote reveals some potential problems with Aristotle's idea as it promotes a discriminatory and unequal treatment of people based on their ethnic or cultural background. The use of the term "despot" for the treatment of the barbarians suggests a harsh, oppressive, and absolute rule, while the term "friends and relatives" for the Greeks suggests a more benevolent and nurturing approach. This two-tiered system is a reflection of Aristotle's belief in cultural and ethical superiority of the Greeks over the barbarians, which is a problematic and unethical idea.
Which statement best describes the relationship between technology and European exploration?
The correct answer would be the third option i.e., the Europeans developed new technologies such as astrolabe and magnetic compass to permit long-distance travel.
Technology played a crucial role in the European exploration of the world. Improved navigation technology, such as the astrolabe and compass, allowed sailors to chart new sea routes and reach new lands. Advancements in shipbuilding, such as the caravel, made it possible for ships to sail faster, farther, and more safely. The printing press allowed for maps, books, and information to be easily disseminated, helping to spur exploration and increase knowledge about the world. Additionally, new weapons and military technologies allowed European explorers to conquer and colonize new lands, shaping the modern world.
Learn more about European technology at:
brainly.com/question/16367407
The phrase " Europeans invented new technologies, such as the astrolabe and the magnetic compass, to permit long-distance travel" best sums up the relationship between technology and European exploration. Thus, option C is correct.
What is a European exploration?European exploration is the exploration of portions of the Earth by Europeans for scientific, commercial, religious, military, and other objectives beginning about the fourth century.
By measuring the height of the sun and stars over the horizon, the astrolabe helped with latitude determination. The Renaissance saw advancements made to the magnetic compass, which was created in the eleventh century.
Together with new trade routes and abundant resource sources, they also hoped to find fresh quantities of gold, silver, and other precious metals. Additionally, Europeans thought that discovery would aid in the spread of Christianity among non-Western countries.Western nations.
Therefore, Europeans created new technology to help in navigation.
Learn more about the European exploration here:
https://brainly.com/question/30291777
#SPJ2
You overhear someone say *Well, the Europeans that settled the United States in the Colonial Era were all of equal status and wealth." What would you say to prove them wrong? Use at least one piece of data from the chart to really prove your point.
I would say that the statement is not accurate and can be proven wrong by looking at historical records and data. For example, the chart on "Distribution of Wealth in the American Colonies in 1774" shows that a small percentage of the population controlled a disproportionate amount of wealth. The top 10% of the population controlled about 50% of the wealth, while the bottom 50% controlled only about 10%. This data clearly demonstrates that there was a significant wealth disparity among the European settlers in the American colonies, with a small group of wealthy individuals and a large group of less wealthy individuals. This disproves the idea that all European settlers in the Colonial Era were of equal status and wealth.
please someone help fast
The colonial region with their main part of economy as follows:
New england colonies = manufacturingMiddle coolonies = slaves, plantation and cropsChesapeake colonies = slaves, plantation and cropsSouthern colonies = slaves, plantation and cropsThe economy of the Chesapeake region was dependent solely on tobacco production. This increased the colonies in the South's need for slave labor. Additionally, the cultivation of tobacco required a constant supply of new land due to the soil's nutrient depletion.
An agrarian economy existed in the Southern Colonies. Although many colonists owned sizable estates that produced lucrative crops like rice and tobacco, others lived on modest family farms. On plantations, slave labor was prevalent.
The New England colonies relied on fishing, logging, and subsistence farming because their rocky terrain was unsuitable for plantation farming. Along with agricultural and maritime ships, the Middle Colonies had diversified economies. Shipbuilding craftsmen were available in New England.
Learn more about colonial region at brainly.com/question/24807786
#SPJ1
The only source of revenue for the Chesapeake region's economy was tobacco farming.
What was the main part of Economy ?The colonies in the South needed more slave labour as a result. Due to the soil's nutrient depletion, tobacco growing also required a steady supply of new land.
The Southern Colonies had an agrarian economy. Others lived on tiny family farms, despite the fact that many colonists possessed huge estates that produced rich commodities like rice and tobacco. There was a lot of slave labour on plantations.
Hence
New england colonies = manufacturing
Middle coolonies = slaves, plantation and crops
Chesapeake colonies = slaves, plantation and crops
Southern colonies = slaves, plantation and crops
Learn more about Economy here
https://brainly.com/question/14423103
SPJ1
How were the Timucua and the Apalachee tribes similar?
Responses
They lived in the same area of Florida.
They were skilled farmers.
They avoided being impacted by European diseases.
They cooperated with European explorers.
Answer:
lived in the same area of Florida
How did Roman Assemblies contribute to the democratic principle of checks and balances?
Assemblies checked the qualifications of judges.
Assemblies appointed dictators in times of crisis.
Assemblies provided a balance of power.
Assemblies ran the courts.
The way that the Roman Assemblies contributed to the democratic principle of checks and balances was C. Assemblies provided a balance of power.
How were Assemblies important in Rome ?The Roman Republic had two main assemblies, the Senate and the Popular Assemblies. These assemblies played a crucial role in the implementation of checks and balances. The Senate, made up of wealthy patricians, was responsible for making laws and advising the consuls.
The Popular Assemblies, on the other hand, represented the plebeians and were responsible for electing magistrates, passing laws, and making decisions on war and peace. This separation of powers between the Senate and Popular Assemblies helped to prevent any one group from having too much power, which was an important principle of checks and balances.
Find out more on Assemblies in Rome at https://brainly.com/question/501861
#SPJ1
C.
How did Roman Assemblies contribute to the democratic principle of checks and balances?
Assemblies checked the qualifications of judges.
Assemblies appointed dictators in times of crisis.
Assemblies provided a balance of power.
Assemblies ran the courts.
Which of the following is NOT characteristic of Neanderthals?
A. Larger brain size
B. Caring for the sick
C. Living in small huts
D. Burial of dead
The one that is NOT characteristic of Neanderthals is option C. Living in small huts
What are Neanderthals?Neanderthals were a group of archaic humans who lived in Eurasia until around 40,000 years ago. They were distinct from later hominin species like Homo sapiens, and were generally distinguishable by their large cranial size and strongly built bodies.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above. It could then be concluded that the correct answer is option C. living in small huts because they are no longer living.
learn more about Neanderthals: https://brainly.com/question/27368160
#SPJ1
Name and explain two compromises between the North and South prior to the Civil War. Use details to describe each compromise.
Answer:
The three major compromises were the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise, and the Electoral College. These three major compromises helped contribute to these tensions and lead to eventual war. These are the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. These compromises and their effects had major consequences that shaped the nation of their time.
Explanation:
pls, tell me if wrong have a good day/night<3
and you can choose the two out of the three
Whicth of the following descripstions most closely characterizes pre-industrial society?
The definitions that purely characterize the pre-industrial society are; Forager society, Pastoral, Rural, and Feudal society. These aforesaid societies mainly pinpoint the time before the industrial revolution.
The pre-industrial society of the modern world occurred in the time range of 1500 to 1700, when man didn't even imagine the necessity of machines and depended on manpower. The pre-industrial era happened between 1850-1900 when man began focussing on machine discovery.
Based on the aforesaid points the descriptions that attribute the pre-industrial society are; the hunter-gatherer-forager lifestyle making the rural society and the nature of rule feudal with part-centralization.
To know more about the pre-industrial society:
brainly.com/question/10376706
brainly.com/question/9847194
A brief history of quantitative technique
The quantitative technique can be traced to the early days of mathematics and statistics.
A brief history of quantitative techniqueQuantitative techniques, also known as quantitative methods, have a long history dating back to the early days of mathematics and statistics. The development of quantitative techniques can be traced back to the ancient Greeks, who used mathematical models to make predictions and analyze data.
In the 19th century, the use of quantitative techniques became more widespread as the field of statistics emerged and the first statistical methods were developed. During this time, advances in mathematical models, data collection, and analysis made it possible to apply quantitative methods to a wide range of fields, including economics, sociology, and psychology.
In the 20th century, the use of computers revolutionized the field of quantitative methods, making it possible to analyze vast amounts of data and perform complex mathematical calculations with ease. This led to the development of new statistical methods, such as regression analysis and multivariate analysis, and the widespread use of quantitative methods in many fields.
Read more on quantitative technique here:https://brainly.com/question/14454038
#SPJ1
Obal Conflicts: 1914 to World War II
Which of the following was an example of a political genocide?
1-Peloponnesian War between the Athenians and Spartans (432 B.C. - 404
2-Expulsion of the Armenians from the Ottoman Empire after World War I
3-Napoleonic invasion of Russia in 1812
4-Six-Day War between Israel, Egypt, and Syria in 1967
An example of a political genocide in this context is: expulsion of the Armenians from the Ottoman Empire after World War I. The Option 2 is correct.
What should we know about political genocide?The deliberate physical destruction or elimination of a group whose members share the main characteristic of belonging to a political movement is also known as politicide. It is a form of political repression and one of the methods used to politically cleanse populations, along with forced migration.
Expulsion of the Armenians is considered by many as the first modern genocide of the 20th century, resulted in the killing of an estimated 1.5 million Armenians by the Ottoman government during and after World War I. The genocide was carried out as part of a broader campaign aimed at forcibly removing the Armenian population from the Ottoman Empire and resulted in widespread death, forced displacement, and cultural destruction.
Read more about political genocide
brainly.com/question/10045353
#SPJ1
please help im gonna fail
Identify a national issue that you think should be handled at a lower level of government.
Then, identify a state or local issue that should be handled by the federal government.
In each case, why do you think a different level of government would be better suited to deal with each problem. Explain your answer.
Because immigration is complicated and varies by state, I think it should be handled locally.
Climate change is a global concern, thus the federal government should manage it.
What is National Issue?National Issue Handled at a Lower Level of Government: Immigration
I believe immigration should be handled at a lower level of government because this issue is complex and varies from state to state. Different states have different immigration laws and policies, so a lower level of government is better suited to make specific decisions that are tailored to the unique needs of the state.
Furthermore, local governments have the resources and personnel that can be used to better assess the situation and make decisions that are more effective and efficient.
State or Local Issue Handled by the Federal Government: Climate Change
I believe climate change should be handled by the federal government because it is an issue that affects all states and countries. The federal government is better equipped to create and implement policies that have a nationwide impact.
Additionally, certain responsibilities, such as regulating the use of natural resources and creating a comprehensive plan for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, require a level of coordination and expertise that only the federal government can provide.
Read more about Climate Change
https://brainly.com/question/28779953
#SPJ1
Why does Sen. Hammond believe southern slaves have a better life than northern “slaves”?
Answer:
He believes that they are more taken care of.
Explanation:
He believes this because in the south, slaves were often integral parts of families and therefor treated with more respect compared to slaves in the north, which, while they were far less of them, the ones that were there were not seen as part of society.
Assessment Of The Roles And Challenges Of The Sub-district Structures
In Ghana's Local Governance System
Answer:
Explanation:
In Ghana's local governance system, sub-district structures play an important role in implementing policies and programs at the grassroots level. Some of their key responsibilities include:
Delivering basic social services such as education, health, and sanitation.Mobilizing and empowering communities to participate in local development.Facilitating communication between communities and higher levels of government.Ensuring the effective implementation of laws and regulations.However, the sub-district structures face several challenges in fulfilling their responsibilities, including:
Lack of adequate funding and resources.Weak capacities and limited technical skills among staff.Political interference and limited autonomy.Limited participation and engagement of marginalized groups.Inadequate infrastructure and facilities.To address these challenges, it is recommended that the sub-district structures be provided with adequate resources, capacity-building opportunities, and greater autonomy to effectively carry out their responsibilities. Additionally, efforts should be made to increase participation and engagement of marginalized groups, and to ensure that sub-district structures operate in a transparent and accountable manner.
_____________________________________________________
I hope this information is helpful. I mostly prefer MyAssignmentHelp.com for my assignments. Please let me know if you have any additional questions or refer to MyAssignmentHelp.com for further assistance.
How did the ruling of Marbury v. Madison influence the power of the judicial branch?
Responses
It claimed that the Supreme Court was more powerful than the president.
It claimed that the Supreme Court was more powerful than the president.
It gave state governments power over the federal government.
It gave state governments power over the federal government.
It broke the Supreme Court away from the ideals of federalism.
It broke the Supreme Court away from the ideals of federalism.
It made the Supreme Court as powerful as the legislative and executive branches.
It made the Supreme Court as powerful as the legislative and executive branches.
Chief Justice John Marshall's ruling in Marbury v. Madison established the judicial review principle, a significant contribution to the "checks and balances"
What is government?The term government refers to that An organized community governed by a system or group of individuals, typically a state. The government often consists of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches in the case of its broad associative definition
By giving the federal courts the authority to declare legislation, as well as executive and administrative actions, inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution and, as a result, null and void, Marbury v. Madison empowered the federal judiciary.
Therefore, The ruling of Marbury v. Madison influence The Federal Government to becoming too powerful
Learn more about the government here:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ1
Answer:It made the Supreme Court as powerful as the legislative and executive branches.
Explanation:rook a quiz
The boundaries of the market have been repeatedly drawn and redrawn through deliberate political decisions? True or False
The boundaries of the market have been repeatedly drawn and redrawn through deliberate political decisions is a true statment.
What is a market?A market is made up of various structures, organizations, procedures, and processes that allow people to exchange goods and services. The majority of marketplaces rely on merchants providing their products or services to purchasers in exchange for payment.
Deliberation is suited for societal concerns because it produces social fundamentals and values to guide judgment calls by seeking to gain to adopt a broad perspective.
This was to be taken with the decision that was taken and the policies will affect the way the market or the economy works.
Learn more about the market, here:
https://brainly.com/question/17284274
#SPJ1
40 points for a good answer
i need a 300 word paper about rent control answering these following questions.
what do you think?
is this fair?
who does it help?
what about the person who owns the rental unit?
does this make housing more available?
Answer:
Rent control is a policy that limits the amount of rent that landlords can charge for their rental units. It is intended to protect tenants from being charged excessive rent, and to make housing more affordable for those on low incomes. However, rent control has both positive and negative effects. On the one hand, rent control can help tenants by providing them with more affordable housing and protecting them from sudden and large rent increases. It can also help to stabilize neighborhoods and prevent displacement of lower-income tenants. On the other hand, rent control can reduce the incentives for landlords to maintain and improve their rental units, as they cannot charge enough rent to cover the costs of upkeep. It can also reduce the availability of rental units, as landlords may choose to convert their units to other uses or not rent them at all, leading to a shortage of available housing. Overall, rent control can help tenants in the short term, but in the long run, the costs may outweigh the benefits. It is important to consider the potential unintended consequences of rent control policies, and to ensure that they are balanced and fair to both tenants and landlords.
Explanation:
3. Civil War breaks out in ethnically
divided Nigeria.
Civil wars broke out in ethnically divided Nigeria because of lack of skilled and literate work force for industry and government.
What caused the Civil wars broke out in Nigeria?The main reason why Civil war broke out in Nigeria because of conflict between government officials. However, political, economic, ethnic, cultural, and religious tensions also arose prior to the United Kingdom's formal decolonization of Nigeria from 1960 to 1963.
In 1966, the immediate causes of the war were a military coup, a counter-coup, and anti-Igbo pogroms in Northern Nigeria.Control over the lucrative oil production in the Niger Delta was also important strategically, and was a factor in France's strong support for Biafra.
Read more about Nigeria Civil wars
brainly.com/question/1293760
#SPJ1
7. What problems exist with the Electoral College?
The problem that exists with the Electoral College is the popular vote winner is not always declared the winner.
What is Electoral College?Electors are not required to vote in accordance with the popular vote, and any election may have to be settled in the House of Representatives.
There are three issues with the College: 'Undemocratic,' it is; It allows for the election of a candidate even if they receive fewer votes.
The votes cast for the losing candidates in each state are discarded due to its winner-takes-all system.
Therefore, the problem is the popular vote winner is not always declared the winner.
Learn more about Electoral College, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28207874
#SPJ1
Try These questions out 1-14 I’ll give you brainliest
Answer/Explanation:
Part A:
1. The 14th Amendment could not have been intended to abolish differences based on color. PL
2. The impact of separating people just because of race is even bigger when the law says it's okay. BR
3. Laws that allow or require the races to be separate do not necessarily imply that one race is inferior. PL
4. Just because racial segregation existed when the 14th Amendment was adopted in 1868 doesn't mean it is constitutional. BR
5. Separate educational facilities are naturally unequal. BR
6. State governments have the power to decide whether to keep the races separate. PL
7.Children and adults can be treated differently under the law, so equality under the law doesn't mean blacks and whites must be treated exactly the same. PL
8.Making facilities equal isn't enough as long as blacks and whites are still are separated. BR
9.The 14th Amendment could not have been intended to force the two races to mingle together when they don't want to. PL
10. Research shows that separating white and black children just because of their race makes black children feel like they are inferior. BR
11. If requiring blacks and whites to be separate suggests that blacks are inferior, it is only because black people choose to see it that way. PL
12. Laws cannot change social prejudices. PL
13. Blacks and whites can only have social equality by appreciating each other and choosing to be together. PL
14. . Separating the races in school makes them unequal under the law and violates the 14th Amendment. BR
Part B:
Do you think Brown court would have said that people could be separated by race on a train? Yes O No Based on your answer, imagine one argument the Brown court might have made for or against Plessy.
Answer:
If Argue For: Riding a train is necessary for some people, and being separated could make them feel inferior.
If Argue Against: An adult on a train isn't like a child in school, so the separation wont' have the same effect.
RevyBreeze
Which two heroes were nursed by animals after being abandoned by their parents?
Horus and Atalanta
Atalanta and Semiramis
Theseus and Odysseus
Odysseus and Rama
The two heroes that were nursed by animals after being abandoned by their parents is: D. Odysseus and Rama.
What is Odysseus and Rama?
Odysseus and Rama were both nursed by animals after being abandoned by their parents.
Odysseus was a legendary hero in Greek mythology and the protagonist of Homer's epic poem "The Odyssey." He was said to have been raised by the priestess of the goddess Athena after being abandoned by his parents.
Rama was a prince and hero in Hindu mythology who was said to have been nursed by animals after his father abandoned him in the forest. The story of Rama is told in the Hindu epic "Ramayana."
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about Odysseus and Rama here:https://brainly.com/question/14927496
#SPJ1
10. Why did most white people support Manifest Destiny?
Answer:
Manifest Destiny was the idea that White Americans were divinely ordained to settle the entire continent of North America. The ideology of Manifest Destiny inspired a variety of measures designed to remove or destroy the native population.
How did Pericles feel about social standing in public life?
By paying political figures, Pericles improved Athens' government. Pericles grew the empire by assembling a potent navy. Athens was reconstructed and embellished by Pericles.
What is social standing?The degree of social value that someone is deemed to acquire is known as their socioeconomic class. It relates more explicitly to the degree of reverence, respect, and honor that is generally bestowed upon individuals, groups.
The assassination of Ephialtes in 461 BC gave Pericles the opportunity to establish his power. After Cimon was kicked out, the democracy party's indisputable head assumed control of Athens with none fight. Up to his passing in 429 BC, he was in charge.
Learn more about social standing, Here:
https://brainly.com/question/21209931
#SPJ1
What influenced the baker and pastry chef in the 21st century
Every year, the bakery and pastry industry continues to be influenced and changed, not the least by foods like cakes, bread, and a variety of other snacks.
How are bakers and pastry chefs influenced?
In the current global period, new cuisine varieties are constantly attracting people's attention and winning them over.
The Philippines' cake trend will continue to be impacted by global trends, particularly in 2022 and especially by Korean patterns. Most likely, Korea will have an impact on the cake trend.
Therefore, the popularity of Dalgona candy in the Squid-Game series is a good indicator of this Korean cake craze.
Learn more about cakes, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28198247
#SPJ1
Why were racially integrated Freedom Rides planned through the South in
1961?
Racially integrated Freedom Ride planned in South 1961 because 1961 Freedom Ride attempted to test 1960 Boynton v. Virginia Supreme Court decision that segregation of interstate transportation facilities, including bus terminals, was also unconstitutional.
What was the purpose of the 1961 Freedom Ride?In the spring of 1961, student activists from the Congress for Racial Equality (CORE) launched a Freedom Ride to challenge segregation on interstate buses and bus terminals.
Why was Freedom Ride successful?The riders successfully persuaded the federal government to implement a federal law consolidating interstate travel. The Freedom Riders survive the Greyhound bus fire near Anniston, Alabama on May 14, the brutal riots in Birmingham, Alabama on May 14, and Montgomery, Alabama on May 20. I was able to. was non-violent when her life was in danger.
To learn more about Freedom Rides visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11192949
#SPJ1
What did the United States have that led to the Second Industrial Revolution?
Answer: the things that the united states had that led to the second industrial revolution was that they had natural resources, abundant labor supply, strong government policy, new sources of power, railroads and American inventors and inventions.
Explanation: please give brainliest.
*Which of the following sentences from Bush's 1991 United Nations address best illustrates his vision of a new world
order?
Sentence from Bush`s 1991 United Nations That address best illustrates his vision of new world order is that the United States had a growing national debt.
What is the main idea behind the Bush Doctrine?The Bush Doctrine was Bush's idea that America could treat as an enemy any country that supports terrorists against America. It also affirms the United States' right to take precautionary measures against countries it believes pose a potential terrorist threat.
What was the vision, according to Bush?"The Vision Thing," George H. W. Bush was asked to spend some time before the 1988 presidential election pondering his plans for a future presidency.
What was the main focus of Bush's second term?During his second term, Bush secured several free trade agreements and successfully nominated John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court. He tried to make radical changes to social security and immigration laws, but both efforts failed.
To learn more about President Bush visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16228626
#SPJ1
Answer: And in short, we seek a Pax Universalis built upon shared responsibility and aspirations.
Explanation:
Where did hitlers persecution of the Jews escalate further
Answer: Escalating persecution and ghettos, 1939
Explanation:
Who pushed for a continuation of Europeans traditions in post colonial Latin America
Answer:
Creole elites pushed for a continuation of European traditions in postcolonial Latin America.
Explanation:
have great day
PLEASE HELP m2
Slavery meant something slightly different for each of the three regions of colonies. Compare the New England, middle, and southern colonies and how slavery was incorporated into each society. Give one example of how they each differed, and at least one example of something they all had in common. Use details to support your response.
One example of how the regions differed is that New England was more accepting of Quakers and other religious groups who opposed slavery, whereas the Southern colonies had a much more entrenched slave-based economy.
An example of something they all had in common is that slavery was an integral part of the economy and society of each region, and all of the colonies were part of the British Empire, which meant that they were subject to the same laws and policies regarding slavery.
In New England, slavery was not widespread and was largely restricted to small pockets of cities like Boston. Slaves in New England were mostly domestic servants, and their numbers were limited by the strong presence of the Quaker movement and the limited economic demand for slave labor in the region.
In conclusion, slavery was incorporated into each of the New England, middle, and southern colonies differently, reflecting the unique economic, social, and cultural conditions of each region.
Learn more about slavery here:
https://brainly.com/question/567921
#SPJ1
Slavery was incorporated differently in each of the New England, middle, and southern colonies, reflecting the region's distinct economic, social, and cultural conditions.
What differentiates slavery in New England in the middle colonies from slavery in the southern colonies?The culture of indentured servitude was one of the reasons slavery evolved differently in New England than in the middle and southern colonies. Indentured servants, a holdover from English practice, were the original standard for forced labor in New England and the middle colonies such as Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Slavery was not widespread in New England and was mostly restricted to small pockets of cities such as Boston. Slaves in New England were mostly domestic servants, and their statistics were constrained by the Quaker movement's strong presence and the region's limited economic demand for slave labor.
Learn more about New England slavery here:
https://brainly.com/question/16047246
#SPJ1