clients who repeatedly return to service providers are said to be caught in a revolving door. advocates may need to help them ----Receiving preventive, counseling, or other services to address the cause of recurrence
In mental health, revolving door syndrome refers to the tendency of patients to get better for a while and then relapse. It is most commonly seen in people with serious disorders such as schizophrenia, but anyone with a mental illness can be at risk. How can we prevent people from going to jail again? According to an Arizona City Hall spokesperson earlier this month, Arizona has the fourth-highest incarceration rate in the country. The Arizona Department of Justice holds her 41,804 inmates. Taxpayers, including re-inmates, are responsible for more than $1 billion annually. 18% of released inmates return to prison within six months. Moderators believe investing in increasing the opportunities for offenders to find jobs after they are released, and investing in other resources to help offenders return to society, will slow down the revolving door. They also recommended hiring more probation officers and reducing or eliminating prison terms to keep certain offenders out.
FOR MORE INFORMATION ON schizophrenia SEE:
https://brainly.com/question/30021743
#SPJ4
What clause requires that states treat people from other states equally to their own residents?
ssume that a change in government policy results in greater production of both consumer goods and investment goods We can conclude that A) the economy was suffering from unemployment and/or the inefficient use of resources before the policy change B) the economy's production possibilities curve has been shifted to the left as a result of the policy decision C) this economy's production possibilities curve is convex (bowed inward) to the origin D) the law of increasing opportunity costs does not apply in this society
Assume that a change in government policy increases production of both consumer and capital goods. Can we conclude that: A) Before the policy change, the economy suffered from unemployment and/or inefficient use of resources.
The economy has not exhausted all its resources before the policy change.
When an economy is not using all its resources, it is producing at a point below its capacity. The economy can produce either XNY 1000 X and zero Y, or two combinations of 400 Y and 0X. Also, the opportunity cost between two goods is always constant. In economics, factors of production are the resources people use to produce goods and services. They are the building blocks of the economy. The economist classifies the factors of production into his four categories: Land, Labor, Capital, Entrepreneurship.
For more information on economy see:
https://brainly.com/question/2421251
#SPJ4
a plaintiff who knows there is a substantial danger associated with certain conduct and goes ahead with the dangerous activity anyway gives the tortfeasor the defense of
A plaintiff who knows there is a substantial danger associated with certain conduct and goes ahead with the dangerous activity anyway gives the tortfeasor the defense of assumption of the risk.
What is assumption of the risk?
Assumption of risk is a defense in tort law, more specifically an affirmative defense, that limits or prevents a plaintiff from recovering damages from a negligent tortfeasor if the defendant can show that the plaintiff voluntarily and knowingly accepted the risks at issue that were associated with the risky activity they were engaging in at the time of their injury. "Primary" assumption of risk happens when the plaintiff is aware of a specific risk and voluntarily accepts it through words or actions, absolving the defendant of its duty of care.
Know more about assumption of the risk - brainly.com/question/21897362
#SPJ4
how did the 12th amendment change the electoral college
12th Amendment The amendment, which was included in time for the 1804 election, specified that the electors would now have the opportunity to cast two votes: one for the President and one for the Vice President changed the electoral college.
What is electoral college?An electoral college is a group of voters chosen to choose a candidate for a certain position. Voters choose a group of electors whose sole duty it is to choose the president and vice president every four years. The Electoral College is the name for this body of electors. The method by which the American president is chosen is called the Electoral College. It was created by the U.S. Constitution with the intention of distributing the right to choose the president among the 50 states. It was created to prevent states with higher populations from deciding who would govern the country more effectively than states with lower populations.
To learn more about the electoral college click,
https://brainly.com/question/7483395
#SPJ4
If the defendant does not respond in any way, the court may enter an order of _____ and grant the plaintiff the relief sought by the complaint.
If the defendant does not respond in any way, the court may enter an order of default and grant the plaintiff the relief sought by the complaint.
The Plaintiff may request a default court judgment against Defendants if they fail to appear at the trial. The Plaintiff must still demonstrate to the Jury that there is a reasonable possibility the Defendant was genuinely served with the Statement of Claim in order for the Court to grant the default judgment. According to the Plaintiff's knowledge, the Defendant: (a) is not currently serving in the military; (b) is literate in English; and (c) does not have any physical or mental impairments that would preclude him or her from witnessing the trial or from comprehending the the nature of the case. The Defendant should pay the Plaintiff what is due as a result of the Plaintiff's legitimate claim. If the Defendant requests it and the Claimant does not attend at the trial but the Defendant appears, the Judge may dismiss the matter without prejudice.
Learn more about plaintiff here
https://brainly.com/question/29213966
#SPJ4
The 14th Amendment protects both civil rights and civil liberties.
Describe the difference between civil rights and civil liberties. Compare
and contrast at least 2 Supreme court cases and how they have cited the
14th amendment to protect civil rights or civil liberties.
The difference between civil rights and civil liberties is since they deal with legal protections, civil rights aren't included in the bill of rights. A civil liberty refers to individual liberties that are shielded from governmental hindrance.
What are civil liberties?
Governments pledge not to circumscribe civil liberties through the constitution, law, or judicial interpretation without following due process. Civil liberties may include the freedom of heart, of the press, of religion, of expression, of assembly, of security and liberty, of speech, of sequestration, of equal treatment under the law and of due process, of a fair trial, and of life, though the description of the term varies from country to country.
Know more about civil liberties - brainly.com/question/13625212
#SPJ4
The DBPR requires that a licensee provide his or her address and email and to keep them current. This information is considered
The DBPR requires that a licensee provide his or her address and email to keep them current. This information is considered the address of record.
What is DBPR?The word DBPR stands for Department of Business and Professional Regulation resides under the executive arm of government and is responsible for granting licenses to and overseeing the more than one million enterprises and professionals it regulates.
In order to communicate effectively the address and email are kept as address record so thta any information can be transferred easily and maintain the flow of interaction between Both.
Learn more about DBPR, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13164303
#SPJ1
The Constitution is more specific about the __________ states do not have than about those they possess.Select one:a. grantsb. entitlementsc. powersd. authorities
The right answer is "powers." The United States Constitution is more detailed about the "prohibited powers" that states are not allowed to exercise than it is concerning the powers that states do.
The federalist system of governance established by the Constitution divides authority between the federal and state governments. The Constitution grants particular authorities to the federal government while reserving all other powers to the states. The 10th Amendment to the Constitution declares that "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor forbidden by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." This division of powers is described in that clause. In other words, the Constitution is clear about the powers that the federal government has, and states cannot exercise those powers. However, the Constitution is not as specific about the powers that states have. This has led to ongoing debates and legal disputes over the years about the exact extent of state powers.
Learn more about federalist system here:
https://brainly.com/question/29788676
#SPJ4
case questions: what is the major legal principle of tort law that this case addresses? describe the primary legal reason that mrs. palsgraf lost her claim on appeal. how is the reasoning for the majority different from the dissent's opinion?
Tort law's main objectives are to compensate harmed individuals for wrongs committed by others, hold those responsible accountable, and deter others from carrying out damaging acts.
The obligation to exercise reasonable care that accrues from one actor to another is a key tenant of tort law. If a party violates the legal obligation of extra diligence owed to another individual or organization and losses are directly attributable to that violation, the offending party may be held legally liable for the resulting damage in a court of law.
Tort law's main objectives are to compensate harmed individuals for wrongs committed by others, hold those responsible accountable, and deter others from carrying out damaging acts.
Every person has rights and interests that are protected by the law, which is the fundamental tenet of tort law. Any action, whether intentional or not, that harms
Learn more about torts law here:
https://brainly.com/question/28213050
#SPJ4
Katelyn dresses up as a vampire and wants to try out her scare tactics on her roommate, Joan, who has no idea about Katelyn's plans. Katelyn
approaches Joan as she is sleeping and whispers menacingly, "I want to suck your blood!" Joan wakes up screaming and crying, terrified that there
truly is a vampire in her room.
- battery
-assault
- intentional infliction of emotional distress
It is possible to classify Katelyn's behaviour as intentional infliction of emotional distress.
What is intentional infliction of emotional distress?A tort (a type of civil wrong) known as intentional infliction of emotional distress is when someone purposefully or recklessly causes severe emotional distress to another person. Physical assault, threats, humiliation, or other extreme and outrageous behaviour are just a few examples of this type of behavior's many manifestations. To prove intentional infliction of emotional distress, the victim must show that the defendant's actions were extreme and outrageous, that the defendant intended to cause severe emotional distress, and that the victim actually suffered severe emotional distress as a result. It can be challenging to establish that a defendant intentionally caused emotional distress, and there must be solid proof that their actions were both deliberate and unreasonable.
To learn more about tort visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14614720
#SPJ1
we have a list of marital statuses of all fsu faculty members. which of the following graphs can be used to display this information? group of answer choices
Graph which can be used to display martial statuses of all fsu faculty members is a)Bar chart.So,correct option is a.
A bar chart or reference diagram is a diagram or chart that gives all out information rectangular bars with levels or lengths relative to the qualities that they address.
Civil status, or martial status, are the particular choices that depict an individual's relationship with a huge other. Hitched, single, separated, and bereft are instances of common status.Civil status and martial status are terms utilized in structures, imperative records, and different reports to ask or demonstrate whether an individual is hitched or single. In the least complex settings, no further differentiation is made.
A status of hitched implies that an individual was marry in a way lawfully perceived by their locale. An individual's predetermined common status could likewise be hitched in the event that they are in a common association or customary marriage. The common status of a legitimately isolated individual is hitched.
Whether a living together couple (like in a homegrown organization) have a common status of "wedded" relies upon the conditions and the ward. Notwithstanding the individuals who have never hitched, single status applies to individuals whose relationship with a huge other isn't lawfully perceived.
Hence,correct option is a.
To know more about martial status,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/15141904
#SPJ4
(Complete question) is:
We have a list of marital statuses of all FSU faculty members. Which of the following graphs can be used to display this information?
a)Bar Chart
b)Histogram
c)Stemplot
d) Boxplot
A woman owned 400 acres of land, half ofwhich was densely wooded and the other half ofwhich was almost entirely occupied by a largegravel pit which supplied gravel for her smalllandscaping business. A small house located onthe edge of the pit was in very poor conditionand had been vacant for many years. The womantransferred the 400 acres to her son for life,with the remainder going to a local charity onthe son’s death. Now the son wants to increasegravel production and expand the pit by tearingdown the house. He also wants to cut the treeson the wooded half and sell them for profit. Thelocal charity, holder of the remainder, sues toenjoin the son from doing any of these things.How will the court likely rule?(A) The charity can stop both the gravel mining and the tree cutting and can block thedestruction of the house.(B) The charity can stop neither the gravelmining nor the tree cutting but can blockthe destruction of the house.(C) The charity can stop the tree cutting but notthe gravel mining or the destruction of thehouse.(D) The charity can stop the gravel mining andthe tree cutting but not the destruction ofthe house because it is dangerous and unfitfor use.
The tree-cutting can be halted by the charity. On the basis of waste, the charity would sue the life renter. The removal of trees and the mining of gravel could both be voluntary waste.
A life tenant typically has the right to merely preserve the property and cannot sell any of the resources, including gravel and trees. However, there is a caveat regarding the current utilization of these resources. Since the gravel mine was already in operation when the son acquired the life estate, the preexisting use is protected, and the son is not responsible for carrying on with the gravel mining. The exception does not apply to trees though. The general rule applies, and destroying the woods would be wasteful because the site has not been used as a tree farm. The demolition of the home may be viewed as ameliorative waste since it removes enhancements to the life estate that raise its market value. Generally speaking, a life tenant is not permitted to demolish improvements just to put the land to better use. However, there is an exception when new circumstances make it reasonable to destroy the improvement. The house was in extremely bad shape and was sitting on the edge of the pit here. The house is now somewhat inadequate due to changed circumstances, making life tenant tearing it down.
Learn more about tenant here
https://brainly.com/question/14998321
#SPJ4
Directions: The scenario presented below describes two choices, either one of which can be supported on the basis of the information given.
Your essay should consider both choices and argue for one over the other, based on the two specified criteria and the facts provided. There
is no “right” or “wrong” choice: a reasonable argument can be made for either.
BLZ Stores, an established men’s clothing retailer with a chain of stores in a major metropolitan area, is selecting a plan for expansion.
Using the facts below, write an essay in which you argue for one of the following plans over the other based on the following two criteria:
• The company wants to increase its profits.
• The company wants to ensure its long-term financial stability.
The “national plan” is to open a large number of men’s clothing stores throughout the country over a short period of time. In doing this,
the company would incur considerable debt. It would also have to greatly increase staff and develop national marketing and distribution
capabilities. Many regional companies that adopted this strategy increased their profits dramatically. A greater number tried and failed,
suffering severe financial consequences. BLZ is not well known outside its home area. Research indicates that the BLZ name is viewed
positively by those who know it. National clothing chains can offer lower prices because of their greater buying power. BLZ currently faces
increasingly heavy competition in its home region from such chains.
The “regional plan” is to increase the number and size of stores in the company’s home region and upgrade their facilities, product quality,
and service. This could be achieved for the most part with existing cash reserves. These upgrades would generally increase the prices that BLZ
charges. In one trial store in which such changes were implemented, sales and profits have increased. The local population is growing. BLZ
enjoys strong customer loyalty. Regional expansion could be accomplished primarily using BLZ’s experienced and loyal staff and would allow
continued reliance on known and trusted suppliers, contractors, and other business connections.
The regional plans for the expansion should adopt, Because the company that was accomplishing the goals, was increasing their profits and also achieving financial stability.
What is Company?A company is a collective of people. The word "company" is frequent and has numerous distinct meanings, but they are all related to gatherings or interactions of people. The most frequent usage of the word "company" is to describe a company. A corporation called Energizer manufactures and sells batteries.
As there are some regional plans there that do not preclude the BLZ. They want to expand their nationality in the future as well. therefore somehow he was not sure about the nationality plan. So they went out with the business and the national plan is also there with them.
Therefore, As a result, BLZ should adopt the regional plan for expansion.
Learn more about the Company here:
https://brainly.com/question/16237714
#SPJ1
In which of the following cases would a federal court most likely have appropriate subject matter jurisdiction?
a.Perry sues Amanda under state law for the amount of $50,000 and they are residents from different states
b.Amanda sues Perry under state law for $80,000 and they are both residents of Idaho
c.Jeff sues Rex for patent infringement under federal law in the amount of $50,000
d.Jeff sues Ted for $50,000 under state law and they are from different states
Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to hear cases involving certain types of disputes or issues. In the case of a federal court, subject matter jurisdiction is based on federal law and the U.S. Constitution.
In case c, Jeff sues Rex for patent infringement under federal law in the amount of $50,000, a federal court would most likely have appropriate subject matter jurisdiction. Patent infringement is a federal issue, and federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over such cases. This means that such a case can only be heard in a federal court and cannot be heard in a state court. In the other cases, a federal court would not have appropriate subject matter jurisdiction as they involve disputes under state law. In cases a and d, the parties are from different states and the dispute involves state law, which would fall under the jurisdiction of a state court under the diversity jurisdiction provisions of the U.S. Constitution. Similarly, in case b, where Amanda sues Perry for $80,000 under state law and they are both residents of Idaho, a federal court would not have appropriate subject matter jurisdiction as the dispute is purely a matter of state law.
Learn more about federal law here:
https://brainly.com/question/28498485
#SPJ4
Should young people ever be tried as adults? Explain why or why not.
Answer:
I think it would all depend on what was done for them to be tried. Like say they committed a murder in all fairness they should be tried as an adult because no one should be able to get away with murder but like for something such as stealing, like maybe picking something up at a grocery store or a gas station. That is something that could lead to them being tried as an adult but I don't think they should if it's not something serious and harmful for themselves or others.
Explanation:
a defendant was charged with illegal possession of a firearm by a felon. at trial, a prosecution witness testified that he and the defendant were involved in
Answer choice A is correct. Although the Federal Rules do not explicitly prohibit impeachment on collateral issues, a court may refuse to admit evidence related to a collateral issue.
What is mean by impeachment?
A legislative body or other legally recognised institution may accuse a public figure of wrongdoing by using the impeachment procedure. It could be considered a unique process with elements of both politics and law.
In Europe and Latin America, impeachment is typically reserved for ministerial officials due to the possibility that, given the unique nature of their roles, ministers may be exempt from legal action or that their misconduct may not be enshrined in the law as an offence except through the specific requirements of their high office. But "peers and commoners" alike have been subject to the procedure. Between 1990 and 2020, at least 272 impeachment complaints were filed against 132 different heads of state in 63 different countries.
To study more about impeachment
https://brainly.com/question/29639436
#SPJ4
Is the primary legal responsibility of a business to comply with the law?
Yes, the primary legal responsibility of a business is to comply with the law.
Businesses are expected to operate within the legal framework of the jurisdictions in which they operate. This means that they are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations, including those related to taxation, employment, health and safety, environmental protection, consumer protection, and more.
Failing to comply with the law can result in legal consequences, such as fines, penalties, and even criminal charges. Moreover, it can also damage the reputation of the business and lead to loss of customers, employees, and investors.
However, businesses can also have additional ethical and social responsibilities beyond legal compliance.
They can choose to engage in socially responsible practices that go beyond legal requirements to contribute to the well-being of their stakeholders, including their employees, customers, communities, and the environment.
To know more about legal responsibility here:
https://brainly.com/question/29871792
#SPJ4
Laws which regulate or curtail business monopolies or dominant financial organizations are called anti-trust laws. True or false?
Antitrust laws are rules that promote competition by restricting a firm's ability to dominate the market. This frequently entails dismantling monopolistic enterprises as well as making sure mergers and acquisitions don't excessively concentrate market power.
Additionally, cartels or groups of companies working together to restrict competition through tactics like price fixing are prohibited by antitrust laws. Antitrust law has developed into a distinct legal expertise as a result of the difficulty in determining what actions may restrict competition.
Antitrust laws were created to safeguard and encourage competition across all economic sectors.
The three key statutes in the development of antitrust law are the Clayton Act, Federal Trade Commission Act, and Sherman Act.
To learn more about anti- trust laws from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/28714114
#SPJ4
criminal law may be classified into which two major categories?
Answer:
Criminal law is classified into two major categories: substantive criminal law and procedural criminal law.
Criminal law can be classified into two major categories: substantive criminal law and procedural criminal law.
Substantive criminal law defines the types of conduct that are considered crimes and sets out the punishment for those crimes.
It is concerned with the substantive elements of a crime, such as the mental state and the physical act that must be proven in order to establish criminal liability. Substantive criminal law also specifies the defenses that may be raised to a criminal charge and the circumstances under which a defendant may be held criminally responsible.
Procedural criminal law, on the other hand, deals with the process by which criminal cases are handled in the criminal justice system.
It establishes the rules and procedures that must be followed by law enforcement officers, prosecutors, defense attorneys, judges, and juries in the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of criminal cases.
Procedural criminal law also protects the constitutional rights of criminal defendants, such as the right to a fair trial, the right to remain silent, and the right to an attorney.
To know more about Criminal law refer to-
brainly.com/question/1205493#
#SPJ11
interrogating the construct validity of association claims could mean asking about all of the following except:
interrogating the construct validity of association claims could mean asking about all of the following except C. Internal
because: Querying Association Claims - Association Claims do not assert causality, so inner validity is irrelevant to queries. Internal validity is concerned with claiming that one variable changes another. To assess whether a study has construct validity, consumers of the study should ask whether the study adequately measured the key concepts of the study. For example, reading research should provide compelling evidence that reading tests do indeed measure reading comprehension.
FOR MORE INFORMATION ON interrogating SEE:
https://brainly.com/question/22898599
#SPJ4
How Long Does a Fraud Alert on Your Credit Report Last?
One year long it takes to Fraud Alert on Your Credit Report Last.
When someone obtains or takes your personal information, identity theft occurs. The data can subsequently be used to obtain advantages like employment, insurance, or housing, or to start credit accounts with your name. Your credit score may be impacted by identity theft.
The removal of fake information and obligations from your credit bureau, known as blocking, is another option available to you if you've been the victim of identity theft. You must accomplish this by sending the following to the credit reporting businesses: a report of identity theft, which is possible through IdentityTheft.gov.
If you're dealing with identity theft, remember that there is a way out, but it can take some time. Vera Tolmachocreiff, Rehabilitation Manager at Assured Identity Protection, is one of our identity experts.
learn more about credit reports here:
https://brainly.com/question/2989669
#SPJ4
watch the video of the thermite reaction, and then choose which of the following statements are correct for the thermite reaction.
In a thermite reaction, the reactants' internal energy is greater than the products' internal energy. Additionally, the system's enthalpy change is negative. Additionally, the system's own energy declines.
Thermite reaction is the name given to the procedure of burning aluminium and ferric oxide. This reaction is exothermic. In this process, molten iron is produced.
Al2O3 + 2 Fe(l) + Heat = Fe2O3 (s) + Al (s)
Since aluminium powder is used as the reducing agent, the thermite process can be defined as the reduction of iron oxide or any other metal oxide. Aluminothermy and the Goldschmidt thermite process are other names for it. This reaction belongs to a group of processes known as "thermite" reactions, which have been applied in industry for welding, stripping metals of their oxides, and creating incendiary devices. Heat starts the process, but it soon becomes self-sustaining.
learn more about thermite reaction here:
https://brainly.com/question/14964571
#SPJ4
Whilst you have been away on annual leave, the Principal of your agency has exchanged contracts to personally purchase one of your listings. You do not believe that your vendor is aware of the fact that it is your employer, as it has been purchased in a company name and there is no declaration on the file or on the copy of the contract in the file. The cooling off period will expire at 5pm today.
Identify and explain the ethical issue in this scenario, quoting any relevant legislation?
How would you approach this with your Agency Principal to express your concern? Ensure you detail at least 2 communication strategies you would use?
What steps would you take to ensure this sale can proceed ethically, and how would you appropriately communicate this to the vendor?
The ethical issue in this scenario is that the Principal of the agency has purchased one of the agency's listed properties without disclosing this to the vendor.
What is a agency?An agency relationship is a fiduciary relationship in which one person (the "principal") authorises another person (the "agent") to act on his or her behalf. The agent is under the control of the principal and must comply with her instructions.
Agents must "avoid any conduct that could lead to a conflict of interest or creates the perception of a conflict of interest," according to the Property, Stock and Business Agents Act of 2002. This means that it is unethical for the agency's Principal to purchase a property listed with the agency without informing the vendor of the potential conflict of interest.
I would use two communication strategies when approaching the Agency Principal to express my concern.
To begin, I would have an open and honest conversation with the Principal to express my concerns. I would write down my concerns in the form of a detailed email. This email would outline the ethical concerns as well as the potential penalties that could be imposed if the sale is not conducted ethically.To ensure that the sale is conducted ethically:
I would advise the Principal to first openly disclose to the vendor that they are the buyer of the property and to inform them of any potential conflict of interest. The vendor should then be given the option to back out of the sale if they so desire.Therefore, I would advise the Principal to disclose the conflict of interest to the vendor and give them the option to withdraw from the sale. I would communicate this via a phone conversation and an email, to prevent the agency from facing potential fines, reprimands and legal action.
To learn more about agency, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29924569
#SPJ1
what was an important accomplishment of the northwest ordinance?
The Northwest Ordinance stated a bill of rights guaranteed in the territory, established a process for admitting new states to the Union from the area, and established a government for the Northwest Territory.
What is bill of rights?The first ten Constitutional Amendments make up the Bill of Rights. In regard to their government, it outlines Americans' rights. Individual liberties and civil rights are ensured, including freedom of speech, of the press, and of religion. The first ten amendments of the United States Constitution make up the United States Bill of Rights. The importance of the Bill of Rights lies not only in the freedoms it upholds, but also in how it exemplifies America's unwavering dedication to self-improvement and its ongoing efforts to create a "more perfect union." There have been a total of 27 ratified Amendments to the Constitution since 1791, which includes 17 more.
To learn more about Bill of rights click,
https://brainly.com/question/28828470
#SPJ4
eisenhower and dulles: new look : characteristics and reasons for the policy ; short term and long term impact on the region
Eisenhower and Dulles new look policy's characteristics are depending on nuclear weapons to deter communist invasion or, if necessary, to wage war while still building up enough strength to continue the cold war.
What are Eisenhower and Dulles new look reasons for the policy?
In an effort to fend off prospective threats, the doctrine placed a strong focus on the use of strategic nuclear weapons together with a reorganization of conventional troops. Its long-term impact on the region was the new look policy of Eisenhower was successful in many ways. Eisenhower had an impact on and helped end the Korean war.
Know more about new look- brainly.com/question/9884177
#SPJ4
How did the court of appeals decide the case? Was this an easy case for the court to decide? Anheuser-Busch, Inc., v. Schmoke 63 F. Supp 1305 (4th Cir. 1995)
In Anheuser-Busch case, the court upheld against a constitutional challenge a city ordinance prohibiting the placement of stationary, outdoor advertising of alcoholic beverages in certain areas of Baltimore City.
Summary of the case "Anheuser-Busch, Inc., v. Schmoke':To meet Central Hudson's third prong in Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Schmoke, the City relied on numerous studies that linked alcohol advertising to underage drinking.
The Court stated in response to Anheuser-challenge Busch's to those conclusions: there is a logical link between the City's goal and the means chosen to achieve that goal, and it is not necessary to prove conclusively that the correlation exists or that the steps taken will solve the problem in order to satisfy Central Hudson's third prong.
If that were required, communities could never take even minor steps to address their problems because they could never be certain of their success.
Read more about case
brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ1
preemption occurs when congress chooses to act exclusively in a concurrent area of law and a valid federal statue or regulation takes precedence over a conflicting state or local law.
Preemption is a legal doctrine that gives federal law precedence over state or local law in a concurrent jurisdiction.
This means that if there is a conflict between federal and state or local law, federal law will take precedence and be enforced. This power of preemption is exercised by Congress when it acts exclusively in an area of law where it has concurrent authority with the states, such as commerce and labor law. The purpose of preemption is to ensure a consistent and uniform application of federal law across the country. It is intended to prevent states from passing conflicting laws that might hinder or obstruct federal policies. When a federal law preempts a state law, the state law is deemed invalid and unenforceable. However, preemption is not absolute and there are some limits to it. The Supreme Court has established that federal preemption should only occur when it is express or implied from the language of the federal statute, or when it is necessary to achieve the objectives of the federal law. In other words, preemption is only allowed when it is necessary to ensure the supremacy of federal law and prevent interference with federal policies.
Learn more about Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
In the case, the plaintiffs may ask the Montana courts to use a long arm statute. A long arm statute:
a. can force someone to appear in a court in a state in which they do not live.
b. is established using a sliding scale test if business is an internet business.
c. can be invoked if someone has minimum contacts with a state.
d. All of these choices are correct.
In the case, the plaintiffs may ask the Montana courts to use a long arm statute. A long arm statute (d) all of these choices are correct.
In contrary to the defense, who is the individual who is being accused, the plaintiff is the party who files the litigation or the party on whose own it is filed. The phrase seems identical to petitioning in civil justice and equity, and to libelant in dockyards. In general, it also extends to equity petitioner, especially in places where law and equity are intertwined. Regardless of whether they were the plaintiff or the defendant in the lower court processes, the person that files a writ of error to review a decision or other lawsuit is usually referred to as the plaintiff in erroneously.
learn more about plaintiff here:
https://brainly.com/question/29213713
#SPJ4
tort law differs from criminal law in that: group of answer choices tort law compensates the injured party's loss. tort law protects the public. tort law involves legal action by governmental authorities. tort law involves a public wrong.
Tort law differs from criminal law in that a) tort law compensates the injured party's loss.
Tort law is the body of law that governs the majority of civil suits. Tort law applies to any claim that arises in civil court, with the exception of contractual disputes.
Tort law seeks to right a wrong done to a person and give relief from the unlawful conduct of others by awarding monetary damages as compensation. The original objective of tort law was to provide full restitution for proven harms.
Tort law demands individuals found at fault for causing harm to others to compensate the victims. Loss of past or future income, payment of medical expenditures, and payment for pain and suffering are examples of typical damages.
To know more about tort law:
https://brainly.com/question/4313662
#SPJ4
Correct question:
tort law differs from criminal law in that:
a) tort law compensates the injured party's loss.
b) tort law protects the public.
c) tort law involves legal action by governmental authorities.
d) tort law involves a public wrong.
The most widely encountered barriers entry candidates must overcome include all of the following, except Multiple Choice A) strong buyer loyalty to existing brands. B) sizable economies of scale in production. C) restrictive government policies. D) the difficulties of building a network of distributors. E) small market size and special customer requirements.
The most widely encountered barriers entry candidates must overcome include all of the following, except E) small market size and special customer requirements.
When barriers entry are low and incumbents are unlikely to take action against new entrants, the threat of entry is a more potent force. When the following take place, entry barriers are high (and the threat of entry is low). Due to substantial economies of scale, significant experience-based cost advantages or learning curve effects, and other cost advantages, incumbents have a huge cost advantage over potential competitors. Strong network effects, patents and other forms of intellectual property protection, high capital requirements, limited new access to distribution channels and shelf space, restrictive government policies, and restrictive trade policies are all factors that contribute to customer brand preferences and/or loyalty to established sellers.
learn more about barrier entry here:
https://brainly.com/question/29656127
#SPJ4