What arguments do Buchanan and Sumner make about the boundaries of Texas, the issue that sparked the fighting
Answer:
no se
Explanation:
What was the goal of the Ming dynasty when it first took power in China in the 1300s?
Answer:
TRadinaol chinesse rule
Explanation:
I found a quizlet that might help
https://quizlet.com/85137147/world-history-chapter-11-flash-cards/
HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP
How were political prisoners managed in the camps after 1939?
They were sent to the gas chambers.
They were well treated.
They were subject to starvation, brutality, exposure, and harsh work.
They were freed from the camps.
They were deported east.
Answer: they where subject to starvation, brutality beat, exposure, and harsh work.
Explanation: i hope this helps you !
what was presidents johnson’s positions during reconstruction
In 1865 President Andrew Johnson implemented a plan of Reconstruction that gave the white South a free hand in regulating the transition from slavery to freedom and offered no role to blacks in the politics of the South. The conduct of the governments he established turned many Northerners against the president's policies.
What are hatshepsut accomplishments?
Answer:
Hatshepsut accomplishments
Explanation:
One of the most major accomplishments of Hatshepsut is that she was the first female pharaoh of Egypt. She began ruling after her husband Thutmose II unexpectedly died and his son was too young to rule, so she became king. She ruled Egypt for 20 years then mysteriously disappeared. People thought she was one of the greatest rulers of Egypt.
Answer:
She was the first female pharaoh to rule in the great kingdom of Egypt.
Explanation:
She was the first female to rule and was considered a great ruler.
identify the four climate zones in Africa and include important natural features that exist across the zones.
Answer:
Saharan, Sahelian, wet tropical and equatorial climate
Explanation:
______is power that is recognized as legitimate.
A. The will of the people
B. Sovereignty
Ο Ο Ο Ο
C. Authority
D. Absolute rule
Authority is the answer!
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Progressive politicians across the United States changed state election laws by following South Dakota's efforts to implement
A.
the direct election of senators.
B.
initiative and referendum.
C.
voting taxes and popular elections.
D.
the right for women to vote.
Answer: B.
initiative and referendum.
Explanation:
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, progressive politicians across the US changed state election laws by following South Dakota's efforts to implement initiative and referendum. The correct option is b.
What is a referendum?A referendum is a direct vote by the electorate on a proposal, law, or political issue. This is in contrast to an issue being voted on by a representative.
This may result in the adoption of a new policy or specific law, or the referendum may be only advisory. In some countries, it is synonymous with and also known as a plebiscite, votation, popular consultation, ballot question, ballot measure, or proposition. Some definitions of 'plebiscite' suggest it is a type of vote to change the constitution or government of a country. The word, referendum is often a catchall, used for both legislative referrals and initiatives.
The name and use of the referendum is thought to have originated in the Swiss canton of Graubunden as early as the 16th century.
Learn more about referendum, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8517640
#SPJ6
How does suppressing certain evidence relate to the constitutional right to due process
Answer:
The right to due process provide American citizens with the chance to receive fair application of the law before they can be indicted with their sentence/punishment.
Cross-examining evidence is a very crucial part of the fair application of the law. By suppressing a certain evidence, we take away the ability of the defendants to fully proof their innocence in the court. This might caused them to be punished for the crimes that they never did. This is a clear violation of constitutional right to due process.
How did Roosevelt’s Lend-Lease Act shift US foreign policy away from isolationism?
It lent arms to Allied forces and allowed them to pay later.
It allowed the US to sell arms to belligerent nations..
It put US bases on German territory.
It put US bases on British territory
Answer:
It lent arms to Allied forces and allowed them to pay later
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
just bc
What was the price range for an enslaved person in Antebellum Louisiana?
Question 1 options:
Prices for slaves ranged from $1200 to $1500.
Prices for slaves ranged from $200 to $500.
Prices for slaves ranged from $200 to $1500.
Prices for slaves ranged from $300 to $1700.
Answer:
I think no 3 is the answer
I need help.what is one possible reason the supreme court might declare a law?
Answer:
The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).
PLS MAKE ME BRAINLIEST :)
This battle was the last battle of the Civil War on May 12 & 13, 1865.
A. Battle of the Alamo
B. Battle of Palmito Ranch
C. Battle of Sabine Pass
D. Battle of Galveston
Answer:
B-Battle of Palmito Ranch
Explanation:
Should the Electoral College be Abolished? Why or why not? You guys can choose any side I just want an answer why or why not.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
In this extraordinarily strange election year, debating the Electoral College might seem an odd pastime when so many other issues concern us. But its logic, its distortion of the democratic process and its underlying flaws will still strongly influence the conduct of the election. So, let me make the case for its abolition and its replacement by a simple national popular vote, to be held in an entity we will call (what the heck) the United States of America.
There are three basic arguments in favor of the system the framers of the Constitution gave us, with little sense of how it would actually work. The first is easily dismissed. Presidential electors are not more qualified than other citizens to determine who should head the government. They are simply party loyalists who do not deliberate about anything more than where to eat lunch.
A second argument holds less populous states deserve the further electoral weight they gain through the “senatorial bump” giving each state two electors, because their minority status entitles them to additional political protection. But the real interests of small-state voters are never determined by the relative size of the population of their states. If, say, environmental sustainability or abortion or the Second Amendment is your dominant concern, it does not matter whether you live in Wyoming or California, Pennsylvania or Delaware. The size of a state does not affect our real political preferences, even though the Electoral College system imagines that it does.
Third, defenders of the Electoral College also claim that it supports the underlying value of federalism. Having the states play an autonomous role in presidential elections, it is said, reinforces the division of governing authority between the nation and the states. But explaining exactly how it does this remains a mystery. Having a state-based system for electing both houses of Congress should be adequate to that task. Presidential elections have little if anything to do with the subject, even when some candidates claim to be “running against Washington.”
What are the positive arguments in favor of replacing the existing electoral system with a national popular vote? Here, again, there are three main points to make.
Yes, Debating the Electoral College may seem like an unusual activity in this incredibly bizarre election year when so many other topics are on our minds. However, despite its flawed logic, distortion of the democratic process, and fundamental weaknesses, it will have a significant impact on how the election is run.
What is Electoral College?We choose the president of the United States through the Electoral College procedure. It was established by the U.S. Constitution to distribute presidential election authority among the 50 states. It was created to make sure that while picking the nation's leader, the larger states wouldn't outnumber the smaller states.
Voters choose an electorate every four years whose sole duty is to choose the president and vice president. The Electoral College is the name given to this body of voters.
Let me thus argue for its repeal and replacement by a straightforward national popular vote that would take place in a country we will call the United States of America.
Thus, Yes, Debating the Electoral College may seem like an unusual activity.
For more information about Electoral College, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/25375266
#SPJ2
what organizations were made during world war 2
Answer:
The IMF and the World Bank
Explanation:
HELP ASAP!! MARKING BRAINLIEST!!! WORTH 10 POINTS FIRST PERSON TO ANSER CORRECTLY GETS BRAINLIEST!!!!
Examine the graph of the percent change in industrial production in European countries following World War I.
Which conclusion can be drawn from the data?
A.) The US saw a decline in economic production of almost 20 percent.
B.) European nations experienced a decline in industrial production.
C.) There was a negative impact on the industrial production of all nations involved.
D.) France’s decrease in economic production was almost double that of Germany.
Answer:
Process of Elimination
Explanation: Sorry but I'm not completely sure what the answer is though using the process of elimination and the data I realized that:
It's not A
It's not B
It's not C
It might be D
In negative numbers the smaller the number the bigger so the double of France would be the size of Germany. (I think)
Answer:It's B.
Explanation:
Process of elimination, duh. :) But D does not even make sense, because it said the DECREASE, NOT the increase. And also, the chart literally says that France is greater than Germany.
Which post World War II conflict ended with neither side winning?
Answer:
The Cold War was a global conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union, lasting from powers met at the Russian resort town of Yalta to plan for the future after Hitler's defeat. It was "Cold" because neither side won, let alone attacked.
Explanation:
What is the story of the enlightenment
Explanation:
The Enlightenment was an intellectual movement in the eighteenth century that emphasized reason and science.
The British colonist Benjamin Franklin gained fame on both sides of the Atlantic as a printer, publisher, and scientist. He embodied Enlightenment ideals in the British Atlantic with his scientific experiments and philanthropic endeavors.
Enlightenment principles guided the founding of the colony of Georgia, but those principles failed to stand up to the realities of colonial life.
The Enlightenment
The Enlightenment, also known as the Age of Reason, was an intellectual and cultural movement in the eighteenth century that emphasized reason over superstition and science over blind faith. Using the power of the press, Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke, Isaac Newton, and Voltaire questioned accepted knowledge and spread new ideas about openness, investigation, and religious tolerance throughout Europe and the Americas. Many consider the Enlightenment a major turning point in Western civilization, an age of light replacing an age of darkness.
Describes the importance of Myths in the Greek religion? need this help will give brain list but how do I do that
Answer:
Myths are important because without myths there are no gods or monsters. They need these myths to continue society.
Explanation:
Which event was not a result of the Treaty of Versailles?
A. Germany was forced to reduce the size of its military.
B. Germany was ordered to pay feliydamages caused by the war.
C. Germany gained control of territory from Austria-Hungary,
D. The League of Nations was created.
SUBMIT
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Germany gained control of territory from Austria-Hungary was not a result of the Treaty of Versailles.
Who got Germany's colonies after ww1?Germany's colonial empire was officially dissolved with the Treaty of Versailles after Germany's defeat in the war and where each colony became a League of Nations mandate under the supervision (but not ownership) of one of the victorious powers.
What territory did Germany lose after ww1?
The Versailles Treaty forced Germany to give up territory to Belgium, Czechoslovakia and Poland, return Alsace and Lorraine to France and cede all of its overseas colonies in China, the Pacific and Africa to the Allied nations.
Learn more about Germany's colonies after ww1 here: https://brainly.com/question/8535233
#SPJ2
What is the text structure?
A: compare/contrast
B: problem/solution
why was jays treaty 1795 important
Answer:
Jay's treaty promised the evacuation of the troops in the U.S. from the Revolution and it also prevented war with Britain (.◜ω◝.)/
The most important work of Mercy Otis Warren was ___.
opposition to the ratification of the U.S. Constitution
spying on the patriots
writing plays and books to support the patriot cause of liberty
correspondence with Patriot leaders
friendship with the wives of U.S. Presidents
Answer:
The answer is writing plays and books to support the patriot cause of liberty!
Explanation:
i got the answer correct on my test
Why did France occupy the Ruhr region
What did John Winthrop do in the Americas?
Answer:
he did his most creative work guiding the colonist as they laid out a network of tightly organized towns
Answer:
John Winthrop (1588–1649) was an early Puritan leader whose vision for a godly commonwealth created the basis for an established religion that remained in place in Massachusetts until well after adoption of the First Amendment. It was, however, eventually superseded by ideas of separation of church and state
Explanation:
hope it helps...
This battle stopped Union plans to invade Texas and took place two months after
Confederate defeats at Vicksburg and Gettysburg.
A Battle of Gonzales
B Battle of Sabine Pass
C Battle of Palmito Ranch
D Battle of Galveston
The Battle of Sabine Pass is the battle that stop the Union plans to invade Texas and took place two months after Confederate defeats at Vicksburg and Gettysburg.
Battle of Sabine Pass is one of the Civil war where the small Confederate force thwarts a Union invasion of Texas at the mouth of the Sabine River on the Texas-Louisiana border.
Hence, the Battle of Sabine Pass is the battle that stop the Union plans to invade Texas and took place two months after Confederate defeats at Vicksburg and Gettysburg.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about Battle of Sabine Pass
brainly.com/question/26270206
HELP ME WILL GIVE BBBBRRRAIN
Answer:
C. It allowed their populations to grow quickly.
The American presidential system is different from
most parliamentary systems because
This system is distinguished from others because it has a chief executive (the president) who is chosen by the people to serve a limited term in office with a distinct separation of powers (the executive branch) as well as specific limitations on exactly what he/she can do while in office.
Help help meee
WOU HELP
WOMET
WIN THE WAR
food
1-buy it with thought
2-cook te with care
3-use loss wheat & meat
4.buy local foods
le
BUY
C25000TR. 5-serve just enough
COUNTSon YOU LIBERTY LOAN
THE RED CROSS SGovernment Bonds WOMENS IN FUND - use what is tere
TAGAD
dont waste it.
The images shown demonstrate government efforts to appeal to:
A. humanitarianism to rally support for "peace without victory."
B. nationalism to encourage military recruitment among men and
women.
C. individualism to spur economic investment and wartime
employment
D. patriotism to promote volunteering, rationing, and giving,
Answer:
its C
Explanation:
The second and third poster is saying to buy government bonds which is economic investments
which argument for including the bill of rights in the constitution is most convincing
Answer:
Explanation:
Madison was actually once the Bill of Rights’ chief opponent. In his book, The Oath and the Office: A Guide to the Constitution for Future Presidents, Corey Brettschneider, a political science professor at Brown University, writes that when the founding father entered the race for Congress as a candidate for the state of Virginia in 1788, the issue of whether America needed a Bill of Rights was a dominating campaign issue. George Mason, a fellow Virginian, had refused to sign the Constitution without a Bill of Rights. But Madison argued it was unnecessary and perhaps even harmful.
His reasoning? “Madison might have felt like a master chef watching a patron pour ketchup all over his perfectly cooked steak,” Brettschneider writes. “He considered his work crafting the Constitution so thorough that there was nothing to amend: Article I limited the powers of Congress, and Article II constrained the president. A Bill of Rights was redundant at best—and dangerous at worst.”