anyone please lol ?

Answer:

b) Then z(s) is in the rejection region for H₀. We reject H₀. The p-value is smaller than α/2

c)CI 95 %  =  ( 0.00002 ;  0.09998)

Step-by-step explanation: In both cases, the size of the samples are big enough to make use of the approximation of normality of the difference of the proportions.

Recent Sample

Sample size    n₁  =  1000

Number of events of people with financial fitness more than fair

x₁  =  410

p₁ =  410/ 1000  =  0.4     then q₁ = 1 - p₁    q₁ =  1 -  0.4    q₁  = 0.6

Sample a year ago

Sample size    n₂ =  1200

Number of events of people with financial fitness more than fair

x₂  =  420

p₂  =  420/1200     p₂ = 0.35   q₂  =  1 - p₂    q₂  = 1 - 0.35   q₂ = 0.65

Test Hypothesis

Null Hypothesis                                  H₀              p₁  =  p₂

Alternative Hypothesis                      Hₐ              p₁  ≠  p₂

CI  95 % then significance level  α  =  5%   α  = 0.05    α/2  = 0.025

To calculate p-value:

SE  =  √ (p₁*q₁)/n₁  +  (p₂*q₂)/n₂

SE  =  √ 0.4*0.6/1000 +  0.65*0.35/1200

SE  =  √ 0.00024 + 0.000189

SE = 0.021

z(s) =  ( p₁ - p₂ ) / SE

z(s) = ( 0.4 - 0.35 )/0.021

z(s) = 0.05/ 0.021

z(s) =  2.38

We find p-value from z-table to be   p-value = 0.00842

Comparing

p-value with  α/2   = 0.025

α/2 >  p-value  

Then z(s) is in the rejection region for H₀. We reject H₀

CI 95 %  =  ( p₁  -  p₂ )  ±  2.38*SE

CI 95 %  =  ( 0.05 ± 2.38*0.021 )

CI 95 %  =  ( 0.05 ± 0.04998)

CI 95 %  =  ( 0.00002 ;  0.09998)

CI 95 % does not contain the 0 value affirming what the hypothesis Test already demonstrate

Answer:

d. Ad hominem

Step-by-step explanation:

A fallacy can be defined as a mistaken or false belief that are based on illogical arguments or reasoning.

However, a lot of people might actually think it to be true but it isn't. There are various types of fallacy, these include;

I. Black or white.

II. Non sequitur.

III. Appeal to moderation.

IV. Bandwagon.

V. Appeal to authority.

VI. Straw man.

VII. Oversimplification or hasty generalization.

VIII. Appeal to ignorance.

IX. Appeal to pity.

X. Ad hominem.

Ad hominem can be defined as a type of fallacy in which the motive, character, or some other aspect of a person is attacked rather than his or her position.

This ultimately implies that, Ad hominem is typically based on prejudices, emotions, or feelings rather than appealing to reason, intellect or substance.

In this scenario, John Bardeen's research work at the Advanced Institute for Physics has progressed so slowly that even his colleagues call him a plodder. As a result, the speaker concluded that it's prudent at present not to take seriously his current theory on how strings constitute the smallest of subatomic particles. Thus, the logical fallacy described above is an ad hominem because John's slowness in his research work is bone of contention for the speaker rather than analyzing and concentrating on his theory about strings.

Answer:

  a. $16.90

  b. 23.5%

Step-by-step explanation:

a. After the two discounts, the original price is multiplied by ...

  (1 -10%)(1 -15%) = 0.90×0.85 = 0.765

Then the original price is found from ...

  $12.93 = 0.765 × original price

  original price = $12.93 / 0.765 ≈ $16.90

__

b. The effective discount from the original price is ...

  1 -0.765 = 0.235 = 23.5%

Answer:

r= 17.73174

Step-by-step explanation:

calculations

Answer:

10mg

Step-by-step explanation:

We have a proportional relationship.

We know that there are 5mg in 2ml of liquid medication.

Now we want to know how many mg there are in 4 ml of medication.

First, we can rewrite it as:

4ml = 2ml + 2ml

And we know that, in every 2 ml of medicine, there are 5mg.

Then if we have two times 2ml of medicine, we have two times 5mg.

This is:

2*5mg = 10mg

I think you are asked to find the value of the first derivative of f(x) at π/4. Given

[tex]f(x) = \dfrac{\sin(4x)-\cos(x)}{\tan(x)}[/tex]

use the quotient to differentiate and you get

[tex]f'(x) = \dfrac{\tan(x)(4\cos(4x)+\sin(x))-(\sin(4x)-\cos(x))\sec^2(x)}{\tan^2(x)}[/tex]

Then at x = π/4, you have

tan(π/4) = 1

cos(4•π/4) = cos(π) = -1

sin(π/4) = 1/√2

sin(4•π/4) = sin(π) = 0

cos(π/4) = 1/√2

sec(π/4) = √2

==>   f ' (π/4) = (1•(-4 + 1/√2) - (0 - 1/√2)•(√2)²) / 1² = -4 + 1/√2 + √2

Answer:

Joe must sell $ 24,330 to make $ 2,082.9 in commission.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since Joe works as a salesman at the baby retail store, and he receives a 5% commission on the first $10,000, 9% on the next $7,000, and 13% on any additional sales, to calculate how much Joe must sell to make $2082.9 in commission the following calculation must be performed:

10,000 x 0.05 = 500

7,000 x 0.09 = 630

2,082.90 - 500 - 630 = X

952.90 = X

0.13X = 952.90

X = 952.90 / 0.13

X = 7.330

10,000 + 7,000 + 7,330 = X

24,330 = X

Therefore, Joe must sell $ 24,330 to make $ 2,082.9 in commission.

Answer:

42 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

We already have the two angles for the triangle, we just need the third. For triangles, the can only add up to 180 degrees. 101+37=138 degrees, now we subtract 138 from 180.

180-138=42.

Answer:

prove that The given system of equations is redundant is attached below

Step-by-step explanation:

System of equations

x1 +x2 −3x3 = 7

−2x1 +x2 +5x3 = 2

 3x2 −x3 = 16

To prove that the system is redundant we will apply the Gaussian elimination ( pivot operation )

attached below is the solution

Answer:

20%?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

using 2 below points to draw:

(0, 7)

(3.5, 6)

Step-by-step explanation:

using

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  snow

Step-by-step explanation:

The relationship between temperature and altitude is given as ...

  T = -2 +((13000 -a)/1000)×2.1

We can put a=2000 into this equation to find the temperature at that altitude.

  T = -2 +((13000 -2000)/1000)×2.1 = -2 +11(2.1) = -2 +23.1 = 21.1

The airport temperature of 21.1 °F is below 32 °F, so we expect the precipitation to be snow.

Answer:

There exists a relationship between interpersonal violence and health.

Step-by-step explanation:

The relationship between interpersonal violence and health :

The null hypothesis will be ; the is no relationship between interpersonal violence and health while the alternative will negate the Null ;

If no relationship exists, correlation Coefficient = 0 and if a relationship exists, then correlation Coefficient is not = 0

H0 : ρ = 0

H1 : ρ ≠ 0

α = 0.05

Reported Pvalue = 0.016

Decison region :

Reject H0 ; If Pvalue < α

Therefore, Since Pvalue < α ; we reject H0 and conclude that there exists a relationship between interpersonal violence and health.

Answer:

7.07 units

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]A = (-3,6)[/tex]

[tex]B = (2,1)[/tex]

[tex]C = (9,5)[/tex]

See comment for complete question

Required

Side length AB

To do this, we make use of the following distance formula;

[tex]d = \sqrt{(x_1 - x_2)^2 + (y_1 - y_2)^2}[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]d = \sqrt{(-3 - 2)^2 + (6 - 1)^2}[/tex]

[tex]d = \sqrt{(-5)^2 + 5^2}[/tex]

[tex]d = \sqrt{25 + 25}[/tex]

[tex]d = \sqrt{50}[/tex]

[tex]d = 7.07[/tex]

Hello,

[tex]\widehat{A}=180^o-24.4^o-103.6^o=52^o\\\\\dfrac{sin(24.4^o)}{37.3} =\dfrac{sin(103.6^o)}{c} \\\\\\c=87.760246\approx{87.8}\\\\\\\dfrac{sin(52^o)}{a} =\dfrac{sin(24.4^o)}{37.3} \\\\\\a=71.1510189...\approx{71.2}\\[/tex]

Answer:

(1) the number of liters the tank holds

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi there!

[tex]\large\boxed{p(x) = 7x + 7x^2 + \frac{7}{2}x^3 + \frac{7}{6}x^4}[/tex]

Recall a Taylor series centered at x = 0:

[tex]p(x) = f(0) + f'(0)(x) + \frac{f''(0)}{2}x^{2} + \frac{f'''(0)}{3!}x^{3} + ...+ \frac{f^n}{n!}x^n[/tex]

Begin by finding the derivatives and evaluate at x = 0:

f(0) = 7(0)e⁰ = 0

f'(x) = 7eˣ + 7xeˣ   f'(0) = 7e⁰ + 7(0)e⁰ = 7

f''(x) = 7eˣ + 7eˣ + 7xeˣ  f''(0) = 7(1) + 7(1) + 0 = 14

f'''(x) = 7eˣ + 7eˣ + 7eˣ + 7xeˣ    f'''(0) = 21

f⁴(x) = 7eˣ + 7eˣ + 7eˣ + 7eˣ + 7xeˣ   f⁴(0) = 28

Now that we calculated 4 non-zero terms, we can write the Taylor series:

[tex]p(x) = 0 + 7x + \frac{14}{2}x^2 + \frac{21}{3!}x^3 + \frac{28}{4!}x^4[/tex]

Simplify:

[tex]p(x) = 7x + 7x^2 + \frac{7}{2}x^3 + \frac{7}{6}x^4[/tex]

Answer:

1. +30

2. +64

3. 0

4. -3

5. +24

6. +18

7. -48

8. -64

9. +21

10. -30

11. +12

12. 0

13. -4

14. +56

15. +2

Step-by-step explanation:

When multiplying integers:

two negatives = positive

two positives = positive

one negative x one positive = negative

So, if the signs are the same, the answer is positive.

If you have two different signs, the answer is negative.

You multiply the integers like normal.

Anything multiplied by zero = 0.

Anything multiplied by one = itself (just be careful of the sign).

Answer:

-15m^10 -38m8+57m^6+98m^4-30m^2

Answer:

jere is your answer i hope it will help u

Answer:

45°

Step-by-step explanation:

<lmk=90°

angles in a triangle add up to 180

45+90+<o=180

<o=180-135

<o=45

Answer:

∠ O = 45°

Step-by-step explanation:

The angle between the tangent and the radius at the point of contact is 90°

The sum of the 3 angles in Δ OML is 180° , then

∠ O = 180° - (90 + 45)° = 180° - 135° = 45°

Solution :

From the given equation :

E[ E (X|Y) ] = E (X)

a). Then,

   E[ E [ X|Y,Z] | Z] = E [ X|Z ]

     ----  True

   E [ E [ X|Y ] | Z ] = E [ X|Z ]

    ---- False

  E [E [X | Y,Z ]] = E [X|Y ]

    ----  False

b). Th quantity E [ g (X,Y) | Y,Z ] is ,

The low of iteration tell the following statement are true E[ E [ X|Y,Z] | Z] = E [ X|Z ] . A random variable y . A function of (Y,Z)

From the given equation the law of iterated expectations

[tex]E[ E (X|Y) ] = E (X)[/tex]

Therefore We have to find a)

Iteration is the repetition of a process in order to generate a sequence of outcomes.

So by using the low of iteration we can say that,

E[ E [ X|Y,Z] | Z] = E [ X|Z ]     ----  True

E [ E [ X|Y ] | Z ] = E [ X|Z ]  ---- False

E [E [X | Y,Z ]] = E [X|Y ]   ----  False

b). Th quantity E [ g (X,Y) | Y,Z ] is ,

For a random variable y this is  -----  True

For a number ----- False

For a function of (X,Y)  -----   False

For a function of (Y,Z) -----   True

For function of Z only  -------   False

Therefore,The low of iteration tell the following  statement are true E[ E [ X|Y,Z] | Z] = E [ X|Z ] . A random variable y . A function of (Y,Z)

To learn more about the iteration visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14284157

Answer: 3x - 2

Step-by-step explanation:

First to solve this, we need to know some basic information such as:

1. (-) × (-) = +

2. (+) × (-) = -

3. (+) × (+) = +

Therefore, 6x-(3x+2)​

= 6x - 3x - 2

= 3x - 2

The answer to the question after removing the bracket will be 3x - 2.

Answer:

it was very nice step so they wine so anther bed boys decided to take his legs and round and round to good boys

Answer:

2/15

Step-by-step explanation:

(-3/5) (-2/9)

Rewriting

-3/9 * -2/5

-1/3 * -2/5

A negative times a negative is a positive.

2/15

Answer:

10, 8, 6, 4, 2, ...

Step-by-step explanation:

For this problem, you were given the recursive rule. The recursive rule consists of an equation that represents how the former term is modified to get the current term and the first term of the sequence. F(1) means the first term; in this case, the first term is 10. The equation in the rule shows that 2 is subtracted from the last term to get the current term. This means that the common difference is -2 and each term decreases by 2. Therefore, the last option, 10, 8, 6, 4, 2, ..., is correct.

Answer:

ano po ba ga gawin jn? para masagutan ko po