Annual earnings, including bonuses, for Financial Analysts and Personal Financial Advisors, are currently following a skewed to the right distribution with a mean of $66,500 and a standard deviation of $10,500. According to the 68-95-99.7 rule, it is correct to say that (select ALL that apply):______.
a. the middle 95% of all Financial Analysts and Personal Financial Advisors make between $45.500 and $77,000 annually.
b. only 2.5% of all Financial Analysts and Personal Financial Advisors make less than $45,500 annually.
c. both of the above statements are false

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

Points T & W are coplanar. Point Z is on both planes, so it depends on how you see it. HOWEVER, Point U is on another plane (plane Q to be exact), so points T, Z, W, and U are NOT coplanar.

Hope it helps (●'◡'●)

Answer:

[tex]241^{257}\ mod\ 12 =1[/tex]

[tex]7 * 20 = 140[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{700}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Solving (a): 241^257 mod 12

To do this, we simply calculate [tex]241\ mod\ 12[/tex]

Because [tex]a\ mod\ b = a^n\ mod\ b[/tex]

The highest number less than or equal to 241 that is divisible by 12 is 240; So:

[tex]241\ mod\ 12 = 241- 240[/tex]

[tex]241\ mod\ 12 =1[/tex]

Hence:

[tex]241^{257}\ mod\ 12 =1[/tex]

Solving (b): 7 * 20

[tex]7 * 20 = 140[/tex]

Solving (c): Multiplicative inverse of 7 in 719

The position of 7 in 719 is 700

So, the required inverse is 1/700 ---- i.e. we simply divide 1 by the number

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

Sorry for the lat reply hopefully you still have that question ready. But basically in order for these equations to be considered inverses of one another it has to map its domain value and switch it to the range value and in this case it does not match the inverse when graphed.

Answer:

10 is the correct answer

Answer:

Go with the third option 10!

i hope this helped!

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

Since all the graphs have the same line, you’re just looking for the correct shaded region. Since for both equations you want the shaded region to be less than the line, answer c solves the inequality.

Answer:

Mean = 33.31

Median = 26

Mode = 17

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data:

32 44 25 66 27 12 62 9 51 4 17 50 35 99 30 21 12 53 25 2 18 24 84 30 17 17

Reordered data : 2, 4, 9, 12, 12, 17, 17, 17, 18, 21, 24, 25, 25, 27, 30, 30, 32, 35, 44, 50, 51, 53, 62, 66, 84, 99

The mean, xbar = Σx / n = 866 /26 = 33.31

The median = 1/2(n+1)th term

Median = 1/2(27)th term = 13.5th term

Median = (13 + 14)th / 2

Median = (25 + 27) / 2 = 26

The mode = 17 (highest frequency)

Answer:

(a)

[tex]Q_1 = 14[/tex]

[tex]Median = 15[/tex]

[tex]Q_3 = 20[/tex]

(b) [tex]IQR = 6[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]14\ 14\ 15\ 26\ 13\ 16\ 21\ 20\ 15\ 13[/tex]

[tex]n = 10[/tex]

Solving (a): Median and the quartiles

Start by sorting the data

[tex]Sorted: 13\ 13\ 14\ 14\ 15\ 15\ 16\ 20\ 21\ 26[/tex]

The median position is:

[tex]Median = \frac{n + 1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]Median = \frac{10 + 1}{2} = \frac{11}{2} = 5.5th[/tex]

This implies that the median is the average of the 5th and the 6th data;

So;

[tex]Median = \frac{15+15}{2} = \frac{30}{2} = 15[/tex]

Split the dataset into two halves to get the quartiles

[tex]Lower: 13\ 13\ 14\ 14\ 15\[/tex]

[tex]Upper: 15\ 16\ 20\ 21\ 26[/tex]

The quartiles are the middle items of each half.

So:

[tex]Lower: 13\ 13\ 14\ 14\ 15\[/tex]

[tex]Q_1 = 14[/tex] ---- 14 is the middle item

[tex]Upper: 15\ 16\ 20\ 21\ 26[/tex]

[tex]Q_3 = 20[/tex] ---- 20 is the middle item

Solving (b): The interquartile range (IQR)

This is calculated as:

[tex]IQR = Q_3 - Q_1[/tex]

[tex]IQR = 20 - 14[/tex]

[tex]IQR = 6[/tex]

Solving (c): Incomplete details

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to prove that ,

cot x / csc x - csc x / cot x = - tan x sec x .

LHS :-

> cot x / csc x - csc x / cot x

> cos x / sin x ÷ csc x - sin x × csc x / cos x

> cosx - 1/ cos x

> cos² x - 1 / cos x

> - sin²x / cosx

> -sin x / cos x × sin x

> -tan x sin x

= RHS

Hence Proved !

Answer:

The probability that the proportion of persons with a retirement account will be less than 57%=31.561%

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that

n=570

p=58%=0.58

We have to find the probability that the proportion of persons with a retirement account will be less than 57%.

q=1-p=1-0.58=0.42

By takin normal approximation to binomial  then sampling distribution of sample proportion  follow normal distribution.

Therefore,[tex]\hat{p}\sim N(\mu,\sigma^2)[/tex]

[tex]\mu_{\hat{p}}=p=0.58[/tex]

[tex]\sigma_{\hat{p}}=\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}[/tex]

[tex]\sigma_{\hat{p}}=\sqrt{\frac{0.58\times 0.42}{570}}[/tex]

[tex]\sigma_{\hat{p}}=0.02067[/tex]

Now,

[tex]P(\hat{p}<0.57)=P(\frac{\hat{p}-\mu_{\hat{p}}}{\sigma_{\hat{p}}}<\frac{0.57-0.58}{0.02067})[/tex]

[tex]P(\hat{p}<0.57)=P(Z<-0.483)[/tex]

[tex]P(\hat{p}<0.57)=0.31561\times 100[/tex]

[tex]P(\hat{p}<0.57)[/tex]=31.561%

Hence,  the probability that the proportion of persons with a retirement account will be less than 57%=31.561%

Answer:

hello there here is your answer

51 is your next term.

Step-by-step explanation:

you are subtracting 9 from each number

95-9= 86

86-9=78

78-9=65

65-9=60

60-9=51

so on and so on

Hope this help

have a good day

bye

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]here \: is \: your \: solution: - \\ \\ given \: number \: = 95.86.78.71.65.60 \\ \\ = > 95 - 9 = 86 \\ \\ = > 86 - 8 = 78 \\ \\ = > 78 - 7 = 71 \\ \\ = > 71 - 6 = 65 \\ \\ = > 65 - 5 = 60 \\ \\ \: now \: follow \: the \: sequence \: \\ \\ subtract \: 4 \: from \: 60 \\ \\ = > 60 - 4 = 56 \\ \\ = > \: \: 56 \: \:( ANSWER✓✓✓)[/tex]

Answer:

To divide a decimal by another decimal:

Move the decimal point in the divisor to the right until it is a whole number.

Move the decimal point in the dividend to the right by the same number of places as the decimal point was moved to make the divisor a whole number.

Then divide the new dividend by the new divisor

Step-by-step explanation:

see in the example

Answer:

A. (5, 2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]\begin{cases}x+y=7,\\2x+3y=16\end{cases}[/tex],

Multiply the first equation by 2, then subtract both equations to get rid of any terms with [tex]x[/tex]:

[tex]\begin{cases}2(x+y)=2(7),\\2x+3y=16\end{cases}\\\implies 2x+2y=14,\\2x+3y=16,\\2x-2x+2y-3y=14-16,\\-y=-2,\\y=\boxed{2}[/tex]

Substitute [tex]y=2[/tex] into any equation to solve for [tex]x[/tex]:

[tex]x+y=7,\\x+2=7,\\x=7-2=\boxed{5}[/tex]

Since coordinates are written as (x, y), the solution to this system of equations is (5, 2).

Answer:

A. ( 5 , 2 )

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to solve by elimination, coefficients of one of the variables must be the same in both equations so that the variable will cancel out when one equation is subtracted from the other.

To make x and 2x equal, multiply all terms on each side of the first equation by 2 and all terms on each side of the second by 1.

Simplify.

Subtract 2x+3y=16 from 2x+2y=14 by subtracting like terms on each side of the equal sign.

Add 2x to -2x. Terms 2x and -2x cancel out, leaving an equation with only one variable that can be solved.

Add 2y to -3y.

Add 14 to -16.

Divide both sides by -1.

Substitute 2 for y in 2x+3y=16. Because the resulting equation contains only one variable, you can solve for x directly.

Multiply 3 and 2

Subtract 6 from both sides of the equation.

Divide both sides by 2.

The system is now solved.

x = 5 and y = 2

Answer:

x = 4/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$64.60

Step-by-step explanation:

$0.19 x 340 = $64.6, which simplifies to $64.60.

Answer:

$64.60

Step-by-step explanation:

Just multiply 340 by 19, then convert into American Currency.

Hi there!  

»»————-　★　————-««

I believe your answer is:  

[tex]y = 3[/tex]

»»————-　★　————-««  

Here’s why:  

⸻⸻⸻⸻

[tex]\boxed{\text{"The value of 9-y twice as much as the value of y" can be written as:}}\\\\9-y = 2y[/tex]

⸻⸻⸻⸻

[tex]\boxed{\text{Solving for 'y'...}}\\\\9-y=2y\\------------\\\rightarrow 9 -y + y = 2y + y\\\\\rightarrow 9 = 3y\\\\\rightarrow \frac{9=3y}{3}\\\\\rightarrow 3 = y\\\\\rightarrow \boxed{y = 3}[/tex]

⸻⸻⸻⸻

»»————-　★　————-««  

Hope this helps you. I apologize if it’s incorrect.  

Answer:

See Below.

Step-by-step explanation:

We can write a two-column proof.

Statements:                                                Reasons:

[tex]\displaystyle 1)\, \angle 4\cong \angle 2[/tex]                                                   Given

[tex]\displaystyle 2)\, \angle 3 \cong \angle 4[/tex]                                                   Vertical Angles are Congruent

[tex]\displaystyle 3) \, \angle 1 + \angle 2 = 180[/tex]                                          Linear Pair

[tex]\displaystyle 4)\, \angle 1 + \angle 4 = 180[/tex]                                          Substitution

[tex]\displaystyle 5) \, \angle 1 + \angle 3 = 180[/tex]                                          Substitution

[tex]\displaystyle 6) \, \text{$\angle 3$ and $\angle 1$ are supplementary}[/tex]                  Definition of Supplementary Angles

Answer:

///////

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

6m/6 =12/6

m=2

Answer:

m=2

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide 6 on both sides

6m / 6 = 12/6

m= 12/6 = 2

So, m=2

Verification:

LHS = 6m   m=2

6 * 2 = 12

RHS = 12

Both the LHS and RHS are same, so our answer is correct

The table is not clear, so i have attached it.

Answer:

z statistic is -2.26

This is less than our alpha level,therefore we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference in the proportion of homeowners between first generation and second generation Hispanic Americans

Step-by-step explanation:

From the attached table, we can see that;

first-generation hispanic americans; (N = 899 and percentage = 43%

second-generation hispanic americans; N = 351 and percentage = 50%

first-generation asian americans; (N = 2,684 and percentage = 58%

second-generation asian americans; N = 566 and percentage = 51%

Z-score formula in this case is;

z = (p1^ - p2^)/(√(p^(1 - p^)((1/n1) + (1/n2))

Where;

p^ = (p1 + p2)/(n1 + n2)

For, hispanic americans we have;

p1^ = 0.43 × 899 = 386.57

p2^ = 0.5 × 351 = 175.5

p^ = (386.57 + 175.5)/(899 + 351)

p^ = 0.45

Thus;

z = (0.43 - 0.5)/(√(0.45(1 - 0.45)((1/899) + (1/351))

z = -2.26

From z-distribution table, we have;

P-value = 0.01191

Since we have 2 samples, then probability = 2 × 0.01191 = 0.02382

This is less than our alpha level of 0.05,therefore we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference in the proportion of homeowners between first generation and second generation Hispanic Americans.

Answer:

[tex]4 \sqrt{2} [/tex]

[tex] \sqrt{32} = \sqrt{16 \times 2} = 4 \sqrt{2} [/tex]

Answer:

0.924

Step-by-step explanation:

R² = 0.854

R = √0.854

R = 0.924

Hence, the correlation Coefficient of electricity tarrif is 0.924 ; this correlation Coefficient value, depicts a strong positive correlation between machine hours and cost of electricity. And can he interpreted to mean that ; Electricity tarrif increases as machine hours increases and also decreases as machine hours decreases.

Answer:

E. 300

Step-by-step explanation:

A rectangle split in half diagonally yields 2 right triangles.

((For this problem, you are probably supposed to use the pythagorean theorem to find the diagonal length, and then calculate perimeter (length of fence around triangular field). In other words:

(sqrt( (50m)^2 + (120m)^2 )) + 50m + 120m)

))

By definition, the hypotenuse (diagonal) is the longest side.

This means that it must be longer than 120m.

If you add the 2 sides (50m + 120m), you get 170m.

Since the third side has to be longer than 120m, the answer _must_ be over 290m (170m + 120m).

300m is the only answer that fits.

Answer:

l = 1920 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that,

The radius of circle, r = 8 cm

The central angle is 240 degrees

We need to find the length of the arc. We know that,

[tex]l=r\theta[/tex]

Where

l is the length of the arc

So,

[tex]l=8\times 240[/tex]

[tex]\implies l=1920\ cm[/tex]

so, the length of the arc is equal to 1920 cm.

Answer:

8.5 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

55 x 9.5 (add extra hour) = 552.5 miles

65 x 8.5 (actual time spent) = 552.5 miles

The time taken for Quinn to catch up to Tracy during the journey is 8.5 hours.

The time of motion of tracy and quinn is determined by using the following equation as shown below;

For tracy, d = 55(t + 1)

For Quinn, d = 65t
where;

55(t + 1) = 65t

55t + 55 = 65t

55 = 10t

t = 55/10

t = 5.5 hours

3 hour from noon + 5.5 hours = 8.5 hours

Learn more about time of motion here: https://brainly.com/question/2364404

#SPJ2

Answer:

554 executives should be surveyed.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have that to find our [tex]\alpha[/tex] level, that is the subtraction of 1 by the confidence interval divided by 2. So:

[tex]\alpha = \frac{1 - 0.95}{2} = 0.025[/tex]

Now, we have to find z in the Z-table as such z has a p-value of [tex]1 - \alpha[/tex].

That is z with a pvalue of [tex]1 - 0.025 = 0.975[/tex], so Z = 1.96.

Now, find the margin of error M as such

[tex]M = z\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

In which [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation of the population and n is the size of the sample.

Standard deviation of 3 hours.

This means that [tex]\sigma = 3[/tex]

The 95% level of confidence is to be used. How many executives should be surveyed?

n executives should be surveyed, and n is found with [tex]M = 0.25[/tex]. So

[tex]M = z\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

[tex]0.25 = 1.96\frac{3}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

[tex]0.25\sqrt{n} = 1.96*3[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{n} = \frac{1.96*3}{0.25}[/tex]

[tex](\sqrt{n})^2 = (\frac{1.96*3}{0.25})^2[/tex]

[tex]n = 553.2[/tex]

Rounding up:

554 executives should be surveyed.

Answer:

The range of a function is the complete set of all possible resulting values of the dependent variable (y, usually), after we have substituted the domain. In plain English, the definition means: The range is the resulting y-values we get after substituting all the possible x-values.

Step-by-step explanation:

idontknow

Answer:

36

Step-by-step explanation:

10-3=7+2=9

4×9=36

36 is the answer

Answer:

Use suitable identity to find the product (3-2x)(3+2x).Find the remainder when x³+ 3x²+3x+1 is divided by x+1.On a plane surface we can find straight lines.8√15 + 2√3The decimal form of 36 100(a-b)³ = a ³- ........ 3 + 3ab²-b³In the Cartesian plane the horizontal line is called .........The coefficient of x² in 2-x²+ x³ is -1.√225 is an irrational number.The coordinates of a point on x-axis is (y, 0).The coordinates of a point on x-axis is (y, 0).The coordinates of a point on x-axis is (y, 0).The coordinates of a point on x-axis is (y, 0).

Answer:

You MADE IT EASY

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] {y - 5 \times 9}^{2} \: times \: sevem \\ n \: equals \sec(x + {}^{2} ) [/tex]