The orbital period of the Satellite is approximately 13,000 seconds or 6.5 hours.
To determine the orbital period of a satellite, we can use Kepler's third law, which states that the square of the orbital period (T) is proportional to the cube of the average distance from the satellite to the center of the Earth (r). Mathematically, it can be expressed as:
T^2 = (4π^2 / GM) * r^3
where G is the gravitational constant and M is the mass of the Earth.
Given:
Acceleration due to gravity (g) = 7.59 m/s^2
We can calculate the average distance from the satellite to the center of the Earth using the acceleration due to gravity. The acceleration due to gravity is related to the gravitational force as:
g = GM / r^2
Rearranging the equation, we can solve for r:
r^2 = GM / g
Now, substituting this value of r into the equation for the orbital period:
T^2 = (4π^2 / GM) * (GM / g)^3/2
= (4π^2 / g) * (GM)^1/2
Taking the square root of both sides, we get:
T = 2π * (GM / g)^1/2
Plugging in the known values:
T = 2π * [(6.67430 × 10^-11 m^3/(kg s^2) * (5.972 × 10^24 kg) / (7.59 m/s^2)]^1/2
Calculating this expression gives us:
T ≈ 2π * (4.229 × 10^7 m^3 / s^2)^1/2
T ≈ 2π * 6,500 s
Therefore, the orbital period of the satellite is approximately 13,000 seconds or 6.5 hours.
To know more about Satellite .
https://brainly.com/question/8376398
#SPJ11
Suppose a piece of very pure germanium is to be used as a light detector by observing, through the absorption of photons, the increase in conductivity resulting from generation of electron-hole pairs. If each pair requires 0.68 eV of energy, what is the maximum wavelength that can be detected
The maximum wavelength that can be detected by the germanium light detector is 1821 nm.
Let's find the maximum wavelength that can be detected in this germanium light detector.
Step 1: Convert the given energy per electron-hole pair to Joules.
Given that each electron-hole pair requires 0.68 eV of energy, we first need to convert this to Joules using the following conversion factor:
1 eV = 1.6 x 10^-19 J
So, 0.68 eV = 0.68 x 1.6 x 10^-19 J = 1.088 x 10^-19 J
Step 2: Calculate the maximum wavelength using Planck's equation.
Planck's equation relates the energy of a photon to its wavelength:
E = h * c / λ
Where E is the energy of the photon, h is Planck's constant (6.63 x 10^-34 Js), c is the speed of light (3 x 10^8 m/s), and λ is the wavelength of the photon.
We want to find λ, so we'll rearrange the equation:
λ = h * c / E
Now, plug in the known values:
λ = (6.63 x 10^-34 Js) * (3 x 10^8 m/s) / (1.088 x 10^-19 J)
λ = 1.821 x 10^-6 m
Step 3: Convert the wavelength to nanometers.
To express the wavelength in nanometers, we simply multiply by 10^9:
λ = 1.821 x 10^-6 m * 10^9 nm/m = 1821 nm
So, the maximum wavelength that can be detected by the germanium light detector is 1821 nm.
to learn more about maximum wavelength click here:
brainly.com/question/15586264
#SPJ11
5. Two friends were studying kung fu and wanted to know which would give them the most kinetic energy that
could be transferred by their kicks: working on becoming faster (speed) or working on building more muscle
(mass). Using the graph below, explain which option would be best. (2 points)
Kinetic Energy increase
per velocity (speed) and mass increase
Z
1 2 3 4 5
67
Unitary increase
8
9
10
Velocity increase
Mass increase
We can see here that the option that would be best is: Kinetic Energy increase.
What is kinetic energy?The energy that an object has as a result of motion is known as kinetic energy. It is calculated by multiplying an object's mass by the square of its velocity, divided by half.
Joules (J) are the metric unit for kinetic energy. Kinetic energy is calculated using the equation KE = 1/2mv2, where m is the object's mass and v is its speed.
Compared to the increase in kinetic energy per unit increase in mass, the increase in kinetic energy per unit increase in velocity is significantly greater.
Learn more about kinetic energy on https://brainly.com/question/8101588
#SPJ1
Assume that a group of explorers traveled to the Orion Nebula, a star-forming cloud at a distance of 1,300 light-years, using revolutionary technology that allowed them to travel at a speed very close to the speed of light. Observers back on Earth would say it took them __________ to get there, but the travelers would say it took them __________ to get there.
Observers back on Earth would say it took them 1,300 years to get there, but the travelers would say it took them much less time due to time dilation caused by their high speed.
What is time dilation?Time dilation is a difference in the elapsed time measured by two observers, caused by a relative velocity between them or a difference in gravitational potential. It is a prediction of the theory of relativity.
What is speed?Speed is the measure of how fast an object is moving, calculated as the distance traveled per unit of time, without regard to direction or displacement. It is measured in meters per second (m/s).
According to the given information:
Observers back on Earth would say it took them 1,300 years to get there, but the travelers would say it took them much less time due to time dilation caused by their high speed. Time dilation means that time passes slower for objects in motion than for stationary objects. As a result, the travelers would experience time differently and their journey would seem much shorter to them than it would to observers on Earth. However, the exact amount of time the travelers experience would depend on the speed they were traveling at.
To know more about time dilation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30493090
#SPJ11
The K-T extinction (also known as the dinosaur killer event) occurred about 66 million years ago. What date is this (approximately) on the cosmic calendar?
A cosmic calendar is a visualization tool used to represent the history of the universe on a calendar year, where January 1 represents the Big Bang and December 31 represents the present day.
The universe is the vast expanse of space and all matter and energy within it. It includes everything from the smallest subatomic particles to the largest galaxies and beyond. The universe is estimated to be approximately 13.8 billion years old, having originated in the Big Bang, a colossal explosion that occurred nearly 14 billion years ago. The universe is constantly expanding, with galaxies moving away from each other at ever-increasing speeds.
The universe is composed of different types of matter, including dark matter and ordinary matter. The latter includes atoms, which are the building blocks of all physical matter. The universe is also filled with energy in various forms, including light and electromagnetic radiation.
To learn more about Universe visit here:
brainly.com/question/9724831
#SPJ4
(a) Calculate the drift velocity of electrons in germanium at room temperature and when the magnitude of the electric field is 900 V/m. The room temperature mobility of electrons is 0.38 m2/V-s.
If the room temperature mobility of electrons is 0.38 m2/V-s, the drift velocity of electrons in germanium at room temperature when the magnitude of the electric field is 900 V/m is 342 m/s.
The formula to calculate drift velocity (v_d) is:
v_d = μ * E
where μ is the mobility of electrons in the material and E is the magnitude of the electric field.
Given that the mobility of electrons in germanium at room temperature is 0.38 m²/V-s and the magnitude of the electric field is 900 V/m, we can calculate the drift velocity as:
v_d = 0.38 * 900 = 342 m/s
Therefore, the drift velocity of electrons in germanium at room temperature when the magnitude of the electric field is 900 V/m is 342 m/s.
More on drift velocity: https://brainly.com/question/30890780
#SPJ11
While reading the strength of magnetic field at each position from the magnet (or coil) using the magnetometer application in your phone, you noticed the reading was fluctuating randomly. Which is the best way to estimate the uncertainty in the strength of magnetic field measurement
The correct option is E, Make the repeated measurements at equal distances and using STDEV/(Sqrt of range of samples) is the best way to estimate the uncertainty in the power of magnetic field measurement in this scenario.
A magnetic field is a physical phenomenon that results from the motion of electric charges. It is a force field that surrounds a magnet or an electrically charged particle and exerts a force on other magnets or charged particles in the vicinity.
The magnetic field is characterized by its direction and strength, which can be visualized using field lines that represent the path a hypothetical small magnetic north pole would take if it were placed in the field. The direction of the field lines indicates the direction of the force that a north pole would experience if it were placed in the field. Magnetic fields are generated by moving charges, such as the flow of current in a wire or the motion of electrons within an atom.
To learn more about Magnetic field visit here:
brainly.com/question/23096032
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
at the same time as reading the power of magnetic discipline at every role from the magnet (or coil) the usage of the magnetometer utility in your phone, you noticed the analyzing was fluctuating randomly. that's the best way to estimate the uncertainty in the energy of magnetic area measurement?
A). Make the repeated measurements at several distances and use STDEV/(Sqrt of variety of samples)
B). Use the decision of the electricity readings in the utility
C). Use the resolution of the meter scale
D). Use the quadrature rule
E). Make the repeated measurements at equal distance and use STDEV/(Sqrt of range of samples)
Consider a system of two rigid bodies, where the entire system is in planar motion, and the more massive of the two bodies is pinned to ground. Which general location is the best choice (most convenient as it does not require tracking throughout the collision) to apply angular momentum conservation
The best location to apply angular momentum conservation in this system is at the point of contact between the two rigid bodies.
Since the more massive body is pinned to the ground, it cannot rotate around any axis. Therefore, the angular momentum of the system can only change due to the motion of the smaller body. The point of contact between the two bodies is the location where the angular momentum of the smaller body can be easily tracked, as it is the point at which the smaller body is in contact with the ground and the larger body. Applying angular momentum conservation at this point means that we only need to consider the motion of the smaller body and its change in angular momentum during the collision, rather than tracking the angular momentum of the entire system.
learn more about angular momentum
https://brainly.com/question/4126751
#SPJ11
29. A flight to be conducted in VFR on top conditions at 12,500 ft MSL. What is the in-flight visibility and distance from clouds required for operation in Class E airspace during daylight hours
It is necessary to maintain a visibility of 5 statute miles and a distance of 1,000 feet below, 1,000 feet above, and 2,000 feet horizontally from clouds.
To answer your question regarding the in-flight visibility and distance from clouds required for operation in Class E airspace during daylight hours at 12,500 ft MSL under VFR on top conditions:
The in-flight visibility required for operating in Class E airspace at an altitude of 12,500 ft MSL during daylight hours is 5 statute miles. The distance from clouds required for this operation is to maintain at least 1,000 feet below, 1,000 feet above, and 2,000 feet horizontally from clouds.
In summary, when conducting a flight in VFR on top conditions at 12,500 ft MSL in Class E airspace during daylight hours, you must maintain a visibility of 5 statute miles and a distance of 1,000 feet below, 1,000 feet above, and 2,000 feet horizontally from clouds.
Learn more about "distance": https://brainly.com/question/26550516
#SPJ11
Calculate the angle for the third-order minimum of 595-nm wavelength yellow light falling on double slits separated by 0.185 mm.
The angle for the third-order minimum of 595-nm wavelength yellow light falling on double slits separated by 0.185 mm is approximately 0.552°.
To calculate the angle for the third-order minimum of 595-nm wavelength yellow light falling on double slits separated by 0.185 mm, we can use the formula for destructive interference in a double-slit experiment:
d * sin(θ) = m * λ
where:
- d is the distance between the slits (0.185 mm or 0.000185 m)
- θ is the angle we want to find
- m is the order of the minimum (m = 3 for the third-order minimum)
- λ is the wavelength of the light (595 nm or 5.95 * 10^-7 m)
Rearrange the formula to solve for the angle θ:
sin(θ) = (m * λ) / d
Substitute the values:
sin(θ) = (3 * 5.95 * 10^-7 m) / 0.000185 m
sin(θ) ≈ 0.00963
Now, find the angle using the inverse sine function:
θ ≈ arcsin(0.00963)
θ ≈ 0.552°
So, the angle for the third-order minimum of 595-nm wavelength yellow light falling on double slits separated by 0.185 mm is approximately 0.552°.
to learn more about wavelength click here:
brainly.com/question/12377285
#SPJ11
A refrigerator has a coefficient of performance of 2.25, runs on an input of 95.0 W of electrical power, and keeps its inside compartment at 5.00 degrees (Celsius).
If you put a dozen 1.00 L plastic bottles of water at 31.0 degrees (Celsius) this refrigerator, how long will it take for them to be cooled down to 5.00 degrees (Celsius)? (Ignore any heat that leaves the plastic.)
The bottles of water will drop to a temperature of 5.00 degrees Celsius in around 5.5 hours.
The following formula must be used to determine how long it will take to cool the water bottles:
Q = mcΔT
Where T is the temperature difference between the initial and final temperatures, m is the mass of the water, Q is the quantity of heat transmitted, and c is the heat capacity of water.
The labour performed by the refrigerator, which is determined by: The amount of heat transported is equal to this amount.
W = QH - QC
Where QC is the heat emitted to the room and QH is the heat the refrigerator releases from its internal compartment.
We can write: Using the coefficient of performance.
QH / COP = W
Because we are aware that the electrical input is 95.0 W, we may write:
W = 95.0 W x t
t is the time expressed in hours.
The result of adding these equations is:
COP = 95.0 W x t for QH
Rearranging gives us:
QH=95.0 WxtxCOP
Now, we can apply this equation to determine how much heat is transmitted from the water bottles to the interior compartment:
QH = mcΔT
To solve for t, we obtain:
t = (95.0 W x COP) / (mcT)
When we enter the values, we obtain:
(12 kg times 4184 J/kg°C over a range of 31.0 and 5.00°C)) / (95.0 W x 2.25)
5.5 hours is t.
learn more about temperatures here:
https://brainly.com/question/11464844
#SPJ11
If a rod of metal is pulled through a tapered hole smaller than the diameter of the rod, the strength of the metal in the rod increases. This is because:
When a metal rod is pulled through a tapered hole smaller than its diameter, the strength of the metal increases due to work hardening which is also known as strain hardening.
As the metal rod is forced through the tapered hole, it undergoes plastic deformation. This means that the metal's shape changes permanently without breaking. During this plastic deformation, the metal's crystal structure becomes more disordered, causing an increase in dislocation density which is the number of dislocations per unit volume.
The increase in dislocation density hinders the movement of dislocations in the metal, making it more resistant to further deformation. This increased resistance to deformation leads to an increase in the strength of the metal in the rod, a phenomenon known as work hardening or strain hardening.
To know more about the crystal structure of metal visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31577431
#SPJ11
The mass of one small ball is 1.50 g, and the mass of another is 870.0 g. If the center-to-center distance between these two balls is 10.0 cm, find the magnitude of the gravitational force that each exerts on the other.
Answer:
Approximately [tex]8.70 \times 10^{-14}\; {\rm N}[/tex], assuming that both balls are of uniform density.
Explanation:
The gravitational attraction between two spheres of uniform density is:
[tex]\begin{aligned}F &= \frac{G\, M\, m}{r^{2}}\end{aligned}[/tex],
Where:
[tex]G \approx 6.67 \times 10^{-11}\; {\rm m^{3} \cdot kg^{-1} \cdot s^{-2}}}[/tex] is the gravitational constant,[tex]M[/tex] and [tex]m[/tex] are the mass of the two spheres, and[tex]r[/tex] is the distance between the center of the two spheres.Apply unit conversion and ensure that mass and distance are both measured in standard units:
[tex]\displaystyle m = 1.50\; {\rm g} \times \frac{1\; {\rm kg}}{10^{3}\; {\rm g}} = 1.50 \times 10^{-3}\; {\rm kg}[/tex].
[tex]\displaystyle M = 870.0\; {\rm g} \times \frac{1\; {\rm kg}}{10^{3}\; {\rm g}} = 0.8700\; {\rm kg}[/tex].
[tex]\displaystyle r = 10.0\; {\rm cm} \times \frac{1\; {\rm m}}{100\; {\rm cm}}= 0.100\; {\rm m}[/tex].
Substitute these value into the equation and evaluate:
[tex]\begin{aligned}F &= \frac{G\, M\, m}{r^{2}} \\ &= \frac{(6.67 \times 10^{-11}\; {\rm m^{3}\cdot s^{-1}\cdot kg^{-2}})\, (0.8700\; {\rm kg})\, (1.50\times 10^{-3}\; {\rm kg})}{(0.100\; {\rm m})^{2}} \\ &= \frac{(6.67 \times 10^{-11})\, (0.8700)\, (1.50\times 10^{-3})}{(0.100)^{2}}\; {\rm kg\cdot m\cdot s^{-2}} \\ &= \frac{(6.67 \times 10^{-11})\, (0.8700)\, (1.50\times 10^{-3})}{(0.100)^{2}}\; {\rm N} \\ &\approx 8.70 \times 10^{-14}\; {\rm N}\end{aligned}[/tex].
Levi keeps the wires so they are as far apart as possible and sets the current in wire 2 to 5 A. Now he varies the current in wire 1. Mira pays attention to the force per unit length on wire 1. What does she observe as a result
Answer:
The two wires exert the same force on each other.
Explanation:
Mira will observe that varying the current in wire 1 affects the force per unit length on wire 1.
When the wires are kept as far apart as possible and the current in wire 2 is set to a constant value of 5 A, varying the current in wire 1 will affect the force per unit length on wire 1.
According to Ampere's law, the magnetic field created by a current-carrying wire is directly proportional to the current passing through the wire. When the current in wire 1 is varied, it will create a magnetic field around wire 1.
If the current in wire 1 is increased, the magnetic field around wire 1 will also increase. As a result, the force per unit length on wire 1 will increase. Mira will observe a stronger force acting on wire 1 as the current in wire 1 is increased.
On the other hand, if the current in wire 1 is decreased, the magnetic field around wire 1 will weaken, leading to a decrease in the force per unit length on wire 1. Mira will observe a weaker force acting on wire 1 as the current in wire 1 is decreased.
Therefore, Mira will observe that varying the current in wire 1 affects the force per unit length on wire 1, with an increase in current leading to a stronger force and a decrease in current resulting in a weaker force.
To learn more about force, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/13191643
#SPJ11
A 30-cm-long cylindrical solenoid with a radius of 5.0 cm consists of 500 turns wrapped around its cylindrical shell. Find the inductance in the solenoid.
The inductance of the cylindrical solenoid is 7.0 mH, which means that it will oppose any change in the current flowing through it, and store energy in its magnetic field.
The inductance of a cylindrical solenoid can be calculated using the formula L = \frac{(μn^2πr^2l}{A}, where μ is the permeability of free space, n is the number of turns per unit length, r is the radius of the solenoid, l is the length of the solenoid, and A is the cross-sectional area of the solenoid. Substituting the given values,
we get L =\frac{ (4π × 10^{-7}* 500^{2}* π * 0.05^{2} * 0.3)}{π * 0.05^{2}} = 7.0 mH (option C).
In simple terms, inductance is a property of a circuit element that opposes any change in the current flowing through it. A cylindrical solenoid is a type of coil that consists of a tightly wound wire, wrapped around a cylindrical core. It produces a magnetic field when a current is passed through it. The inductance of the solenoid depends on factors such as the number of turns, the length of the solenoid, and the radius of the solenoid.
learn more about inductance Refer: https://brainly.com/question/29981117
#SPJ11
complete question:
A 30-cm-long cylindrical solenoid with a radius of 5.0 cm consists of 500 turns wrapped around its cylindrical shell. Find the inductance in the solenoid.
a. 4.6 mH
b.5.8 mH
C. 7.0 mH
d.8.2 mH
e. 3.4 mH
if the current in a 160 mH coil changes steadily from 25 A to 10 A in 350 ms, what is the magnitude of the induced emf
The magnitude of the induced emf in the 160 mH coil, when the current changes steadily from 25 A to 10 A in 350 ms, is approximately 6.857 V.
To find the magnitude of the induced emf in the coil, we need to use the formula:
emf = -L × (ΔI/Δt)
where emf is the induced electromotive force, L is the inductance of the coil, ΔI is the change in current, and Δt is the time it takes for the current to change.
1. Convert the given values into the appropriate units:
L = 160 mH = 0.160 H (converting millihenries to henries)
ΔI = 25 A - 10 A = 15 A (calculating the change in current)
Δt = 350 ms = 0.350 s (converting milliseconds to seconds)
2. Substitute the given values into the formula:
emf = -0.160 × (15 / 0.350)
3. Perform the calculation:
emf ≈ -6.857 V
Since we are looking for the magnitude of the induced emf, we can ignore the negative sign and report the value as:
Magnitude of induced emf ≈ 6.857 V
The magnitude of the induced emf in the 160 mH coil, when the current changes steadily from 25 A to 10 A in 350 ms, is approximately 6.857 V.
For more information on current kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/31484399
#SPJ11
An electrolytic cell consists of two inert Pt- electrodes and 0.766 M NaOH (aq) solution under standard conditions.
(a) What are the half-reactions for the anode and cathode?
(b) What is the standard cell potential for this cell?
(c) What external potential must be applied to this cell so that it will function as an electrolytic cell?
(d) How many electrons flow through the cell if the cell is driven by 2.0A current for 1.5 hours?
The half-reactions are as follows Anode (oxidation): 2H2O(l) → O2(g) + 4H+(aq) + 4e- Cathode (reduction): 2H2O l + 2e- → H2(g) + 2OH-aq. The find the standard cell potential (Excel), we first need to find the standard reduction potentials (E°) for each half-reaction.
The standard reduction potential table
E°(O2/H2O) = +1.23 V
(For the anode reaction, reverse the sign as it is an oxidation reaction) E°(H2O/H2) = -0.83 V Now, we can calculate the
Excel = Cathode - Encode = (-0.83) - (-1.23) = +0.40 V
As an electrolytic cell requires an external potential to drive the non-spontaneous reaction, the applied external potential must be greater than the standard cell potential External potential > +0.40 V To find the number of electrons that flow through the cell, we can use the formula Number of electrons.
= (Current × Time) / (Faraday's constant)
First, we need to convert the time to seconds:
1.5 hours × 3600 s/hour = 5400 s
Then, we can calculate the number of electrons Number of electrons = (2.0 A × 5400 s) / (96,485 C/mol) ≈ 0.111 mol
of electrons in summary, the anode and cathode half-reactions involve the production of O2 and H2 gas, respectively, and the standard cell potential is +0.40 V. An external potential greater than +0.40 V must be applied for the cell to function as an electrolytic cell. Finally, 0.111 mol of electrons flow through the cell when driven by a 2.0 A current for 1.5 hours.
learn more about potential here.
https://brainly.com/question/30461100
#SPJ11
When Herschel counted stars in the sky along the Milky Way, he concluded that the Sun was close to the center of the Milky Way. Why was he wrong
Herschel's assumption of uniform star distribution in the Milky Way was incorrect. Technological advancements allowed us to map the galaxy's structure and determine the Sun's position in an outer arm.
Herschel's conclusion that the Sun was close to the center of the Milky Way was based on the assumption that the stars in the Milky Way were uniformly distributed. However, this assumption turned out to be incorrect. Later studies, such as those by Harlow Shapley, demonstrated that the Milky Way is a barred spiral galaxy and that the Sun is actually located in one of its outer arms, known as the Orion Arm.
Additionally, Herschel's counting of stars was limited by the technology of his time, which did not allow him to see through the dust and gas that make up the Milky Way's disk. Today, with modern telescopes, we can observe stars and other objects in different wavelengths, allowing us to peer deeper into the galaxy and map its structure.
Herschel's conclusion about the location of the Sun in the Milky Way was based on limited information and a flawed assumption. Subsequent observations and technological advancements have since allowed us to better understand the structure of our galaxy, revealing that the Sun is located much farther away from the center than previously thought.
To learn more about Milky Way
https://brainly.com/question/18365761
#SPJ4
If a boat and its riders have a mass of 800 kgkg and the boat drifts in at 1.6 m/sm/s how much work does Sam do to stop it
Sam doesn't do any work to stop the boat. This is because the force needed to stop the boat is 0 N, as the boat is not accelerating.
To calculate the work that Sam does to stop the boat, we need to use the formula:
work = force x distance
Using Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states that force equals mass times acceleration (F = ma). Since the boat is drifting in at a constant speed, its acceleration is 0 m/s^2. Therefore, the force needed to stop the boat is also 0 N.
Next, we need to find the distance over which Sam stops the boat. We don't have this information in the question, so we'll assume that Sam stops the boat over a distance of 10 meters. This distance is just an estimate and may not be accurate.
Using the formula for work, we can now calculate the amount of work that Sam does to stop the boat:
work = force x distance
work = 0 N x 10 m
work = 0 J
The answer to the question is 0 J, which means that Sam doesn't do any work to stop the boat. This is because the force needed to stop the boat is 0 N, as the boat is not accelerating. Therefore, Sam doesn't need to exert any force to stop the boat, and hence doesn't do any work.
To know more about work, click here
https://brainly.com/question/18094932
#SPJ11
An object is launched horizontally off a 30 m high building so that it lands 121 m away from its initial location. Do you need to know the mass of the projectile to find the initial velocity of the projectile
The initial Velocity of the projectile is approximately 49.19 m/s horizontally. Remember, the mass of the object does not affect the initial velocity .
To determine the initial velocity of the projectile, you do not need to know the mass of the object. This is because the mass will not affect the object's trajectory in this scenario. Instead, you can use the kinematic equations to find the initial velocity based on the height and horizontal distance given.
Here's a step-by-step explanation:
Separate the motion into horizontal and vertical components. The object's horizontal velocity remains constant throughout its flight, while its vertical velocity is affected by gravity.
To find the time of flight, use the vertical component of the motion. Since the object falls 30 m, use the equation: h = 0.5 * g * t^2, where h = 30 m and g = 9.81 m/s² (gravity). Solve for t:
30 = 0.5 * 9.81 * t^2
t^2 = (30 * 2) / 9.81
t ≈ 2.46 s
Now, use the horizontal component to find the initial velocity. The horizontal distance (x) is given as 121 m, and the equation for horizontal motion is: x = v_horizontal * t, where v_horizontal is the initial horizontal velocity. Solve for v_horizontal:
121 = v_horizontal * 2.46
v_horizontal ≈ 49.19 m/s
So, the initial velocity of the projectile is approximately 49.19 m/s horizontally. Remember, the mass of the object does not affect the initial velocity calculation in this case.
To learn more about Velocity .
https://brainly.com/question/29396365
#SPJ11
What factor will control whether or not the universe keeps expanding or eventually starts to contract
To answer what factor will control whether or not the universe keeps expanding or eventually starts to contract.
The factor that will control whether or not the universe keeps expanding or eventually starts to contract is the amount of matter and energy in the universe. If there is enough matter and energy, the gravitational pull will eventually cause the expansion to slow down and stop, and the universe will begin to contract. However, if there is not enough matter and energy, the expansion will continue indefinitely. Scientists are still studying the composition of the universe to determine whether or not there is enough matter and energy to cause a contraction.
Learn more about universe at: https://brainly.com/question/28365362
#SPJ11
What is the average momentum of an avalanche that moves a 40-cm-thick layer of snow over an area of 100 m by 500 m over a distance of 1 km down a hill in 5.5 s
The average momentum of the avalanche is approximately 1,090,909,090 kg*m/s. By using momentum formula Momentum = mass x velocity
To calculate the average momentum of an avalanche, we first need to find its mass, then its velocity, and finally, use the momentum formula. Here are the steps:
1. Calculate the volume of the snow layer:
Volume = thickness x length x width = 0.4 m (40 cm) x 100 m x 500 m = 20,000 m³
2. Find the mass of the snow layer, assuming the snow density is 300 kg/m³ (a typical value):
Mass = volume x density = 20,000 m³ x 300 kg/m³ = 6,000,000 kg
3. Calculate the average velocity of the avalanche:
Distance = 1 km = 1,000 m
Time = 5.5 s
Velocity = distance / time = 1,000 m / 5.5 s ≈ 181.82 m/s
4. Compute the average momentum:
Momentum = mass x velocity = 6,000,000 kg x 181.82 m/s ≈ 1,090,909,090 kg*m/s
To know more about Momentum Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30677308
#SPJ11
an elementary student of mass m=34 kg is swinging on a swing. the length from the top of the swing set to the seat is L=4.7 m. the child is attempting to swing all the way around in a full circle.
-what is the minimum speed in meters per second the child must be moving with at the top of the path in order to make a full circle?
-assuming the child is traveling at the speed found in part a what is their apparent weight in newtons at the top of their path? (at the top, the child is upside-down)
-if the velocity at the very top is the same velocity from part a what is the childs apparent weight in newtons at the very bottoms of the path?
An elementary student of mass m=34 kg is swinging on a swing. the length from the top of the swing set to the seat is L=4.7 m.
a) The minimum speed the child must be moving at the top of the path in order to make a full circle is 9.14 m/s.
b) The apparent weight of the child at the top of the path is 1005.52 N.
c) The apparent weight of the child at the bottom of the path is 333.54 N.
We can solve this problem using the conservation of energy and the centripetal force equation.
(a) At the top of the swing, the child is momentarily at rest, so all of the kinetic energy has been converted to potential energy. All of the potential energy has been transformed into kinetic energy at the swing's bottom.
The minimum speed required at the top of the path to make a full circle is the speed at which the centripetal force required to keep the child moving in a circle is equal to the gravitational force pulling the child downward.
Setting the centripetal force and gravitational force equal, we have:
[tex]mv^2 / L[/tex]= mg
where m is the mass of the child, v is the speed of the child at the top of the path, L is the length of the swing, and g is the acceleration due to gravity.
Solving for v, we get:
v = [tex]\sqrt{(gL) }[/tex]= [tex]\sqrt{(9.81 m/s^2 * 4.7 m) }[/tex]≈ 9.14 m/s
Therefore, the minimum speed the child must be moving at the top of the path in order to make a full circle is approximately 9.14 m/s.
(b) At the top of the path, the child is momentarily upside-down, so the apparent weight is the sum of the gravitational force and the centripetal force required to keep the child moving in a circle.
The gravitational force on the child is:
[tex]mg = 34 kg * 9.81 m/s^2 = 333.54 N[/tex]
To keep the kid moving in a circle, you need to apply the following centripetal force:
[tex]mv^2 / L = 34 kg * (9.14 m/s)^2 / 4.7 m[/tex] ≈ [tex]671.98 N[/tex]
Therefore, the apparent weight of the child at the top of the path is approximately 1005.52 N (333.54 N + 671.98 N).
(c) At the bottom of the path, the child is moving at the same speed as at the top, so the centripetal force required to keep the child moving in a circle is the same. However, at the bottom of the path, the gravitational force is the only force acting on the child.
The gravitational force on the child is the same as in part (b):
mg = [tex]34 kg * 9.81 m/s^2 = 333.54 N[/tex]
The centripetal force required to keep the child moving in a circle is:
[tex]mv^2 / L = 34 kg * (9.14 m/s)^2 / 4.7 m[/tex] ≈ [tex]671.98 N[/tex]
Therefore, the apparent weight of the child at the bottom of the path is approximately 333.54 N (equal to the gravitational force).
To learn more about the centripetal force equation, refer:-
https://brainly.com/question/14021112
#SPJ11
A metal block has a density of 2500 kg per cubic meter and a volume of 2 cubic meters. What is the block's mass
A metal block has a density of 2500 kg per cubic meter and a volume of 2 cubic meters. The block's mass is 5000 kg.
The mass of the metal block can be calculated using the formula:
mass = density x volume
where density is measured in kilograms per cubic meter (kg/m³) and volume is measured in cubic meters (m³).
In this case, the density of the metal block is 2500 kg/m³ and the volume is 2 m³. Substituting these values into the formula, we get:
mass = density x volume
mass = 2500 kg/m³ x 2 m³
mass = 5000 kg
Therefore, the mass of the metal block is 5000 kg.
To know more about the metal block refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/29807198#
#SPJ11
(a) What is the gravitational potential energy of a two-particle system with masses 9.3 kg and 7.3 kg, if they are separated by 2.1 m
the gravitational potential energy of the two-particle system is approximately 2.046 × 10^(-10) N*m.by using formula of
U = (G * m1 * m2) / r where gravitational constant is 6.674 × 10^(-11) N(m/kg)^2
Gravitational potential energy is the energy an object has due to its position in a gravitational field, specifically the energy it would take to separate two objects against the force of gravity.
To calculate the gravitational potential energy (U) of a two-particle system with masses m1 (9.3 kg) and m2 (7.3 kg) separated by a distance r (2.1 m), you can use the following formula:
U = (G * m1 * m2) / r
where G is the gravitational constant, approximately 6.674 × 10^(-11) N(m/kg)^2.
Now, we can plug in the values into the formula:
U = (6.674 × 10^(-11) N(m/kg)^2 * 9.3 kg * 7.3 kg) / 2.1 m
Next, we perform the calculations:
U ≈ (4.297 × 10^(-10) N*m^2/kg^2) / 2.1 m
U ≈ 2.046 × 10^(-10) N*m
So, the gravitational potential energy of the two-particle system is approximately 2.046 × 10^(-10) N*m.
To know more about gravitational potential energy Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19768887
#SPJ11
how long does it take a child to swing to complete one swing if her center of gracity is 5.69m below the pivot
it takes approximately 4.18 seconds for the child to swing back and forth once. Note that this is a simplified model and does not take into account factors such as air resistance and the child's initial angle of release, which can affect the motion of the swing.
The time it takes for a child to complete one swing depends on several factors, including the length of the swing, the angle of the swing, and the force of gravity. However, we can use a simplified model to estimate the time it takes for a child to swing back and forth once, assuming that the swing is a simple pendulum.
The period of a simple pendulum, represented by the symbol T, is given by the formula:
T = 2π √(L/g)
where L is the length of the pendulum and g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.81 m/s² on Earth).
In this problem, the child's center of gravity is located 5.69 m below the pivot. Assuming that the length of the swing is equal to the distance between the pivot and the child's center of gravity, we can calculate the length of the pendulum as:
L = 5.69 m
Substituting this value and the value of g into the formula above, we get:
T = 2π √(L/g)
= 2π √(5.69 m / 9.81 m/s²)
= 4.18 s
What is center of gravity?
The center of gravity (COG) is the point in a body or system at which the weight is evenly distributed and there is no net torque.
To know more about the center of gravity visit:
brainly.com/question/20662119
#SPJ11
What happens to the number of waves when you change the color from green to
violet?
A) increase
B) decrease
C) remain the same
D) there are not any waves present
When operated on a household 110.0 V line, typical hair dryers draw about 1450 W of power. The current can be modeled as a long, straight wire in the handle. During use, the current is about 2.65 cm from the user's hand. What is the current in the hair dryer?
The current in the hair dryer is approximately 13.18 A.
An electric current is a stream of charged particles, such as electrons or ions, moving through an electrical conductor or space. It is measured as the net rate of flow of electric charge through a surface or into a control volume.
To find the current in the hair dryer when it operates on a 110.0 V line and draws 1450 W of power, we can use the formula:
Power (P) = Voltage (V) × Current (I)
We are given the power (1450 W) and the voltage (110.0 V), so we can solve for the current (I) as follows:
1. Rearrange the formula to solve for I:
I = P / V
2. Substitute the given values:
I = 1450 W / 110.0 V
3. Calculate the result:
I ≈ 13.18 A
Learn more about current:
https://brainly.com/question/1100341
#SPJ11
what initial speed should a particle be given if it is to have a final speed when it is very far from the earth
To determine the initial speed of a particle required to have a final speed when it is far from the earth, several factors come into play. The gravitational force exerted by the earth on the particle will determine its acceleration. The initial speed must be such that the particle can overcome the gravitational pull of the earth and reach the desired final speed.
The formula that can be used to calculate the initial speed required is:
v1 = √(2GM/R + v2^2)
Where v1 is the initial speed, v2 is the final speed, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the earth, and R is the distance of the particle from the earth.
So, the initial speed required would depend on the final speed and the distance of the particle from the earth. For instance, if the particle is to have a final speed of 10 km/s and is very far from the earth, say 10,000 km away, the initial speed required would be approximately 11.18 km/s.
In conclusion, the initial speed required for a particle to have a final speed when it is far from the earth depends on various factors such as the final speed, the distance of the particle from the earth, and the gravitational force of the earth on the particle.
To know more about speed visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28224010
#SPJ11
Light from a helium-neon laser with a wavelength of 650 nm passes through a 0.180 mm diameter hole and forms a diffraction pattern on a screen 2 m behind the hole. Calculate the diameter of the central maximum.
Answer:
Question:
Light that is from a helium-neon laser and has a wavelength of 633 nm passes through a 0.18-mm-diameter hole and forms a diffraction pattern on a screen 2.15 m behind the hole. Calculate the diameter of the central maximum.
Wavelength:
The horizontal distance between the two progressive peaks or troughs of a wave is known as the wavelength. Mathematically wavelength of a wave is the ratio between the velocity of the wave to the frequency of the wave.
Explanation:
Wavelength of the light is: {eq}\lambda = 633\;{\rm{nm}} = 0.000633\;{\rm{mm}} {/eq}
Diameter of the hole is: {eq}d = 0.18\;{\rm{mm}} {/eq}
The distance of the screen is: {eq}s = 2.15\;{\rm{m}} {/eq}
Expression to calculate the angular resolution of the diameter of the hole is
{eq}\alpha = 2.44\dfrac{\lambda }{d} {/eq}
Substitute the value in above expression
{eq}\begin{align*} \alpha & = 2.44\dfrac{{\left( {0.000633\;{\rm{mm}}} \right)}}{{\left( {0.18\;{\rm{mm}}} \right)}}\\ \alpha &= 8.58 \times {10^{ - 3}} \end{align*} {/eq}
Expression to calculate the diameter of the hole is
{eq}D = \alpha s {/eq}
Substitute the value in above expression
{eq}\begin{align*} D &= \left( {8.58 \times {{10}^{ - 3}}} \right)\left( {2.15\;{\rm{m}}} \right)\\ D &= 0.01844\;{\rm{m}} \times \left( {\dfrac{{1000\;{\rm{mm}}}}{{1\;{\rm{m}}}}} \right)\\ D &\approx 18.448\;{\rm{mm}} \end{align*} {/eq}
Thus the diameter of the hole is {eq}18.448\;{\rm{mm}}{/eq}.
The diameter of the central maximum is 23 mm.
When light from a laser with a certain wavelength passes through a small hole, it diffracts and creates a pattern of bright and dark fringes on a screen placed some distance away. The diameter of the central maximum of the diffraction pattern can be calculated using the formula:
d = (2 * λ * D) / D_h
where d is the diameter of the central maximum, λ is the wavelength of the laser light, D is the distance between the hole and the screen, and D_h is the diameter of the hole.
Substituting the given values, we get:
λ = 650 nm = 650 × 10^-9 m
D_h = 0.180 mm = 0.180 × 10^-3 m
D = 2 m
d = (2 * 650 × 10^-9 * 2) / 0.180 × 10^-3
= 0.023 m
= 23 mm
This means that the central bright spot in the diffraction pattern will be 23 mm in diameter on the screen placed 2 m away from the hole.
Know more about central maximum here:
https://brainly.com/question/16217819
#SPJ11
Planet Tehar has a radius of 10,000 km. An object dropped near Tehar's surface falls with an acceleration of 36 m/s2. What is the strength of Tehar's gravitational field at a height of 50,000 km above its surface
The strength of Tehar's gravitational field at a height of 50,000 km above its surface is approximately 1.44 m/s^2.
To understand why, we need to use the formula for gravitational field strength: g = GM/r^2, where g is the gravitational field strength, M is the mass of the planet, and r is the distance from the center of the planet.
Since the planet has a radius of 10,000 km, its diameter is 20,000 km. Therefore, its total distance from the center to a point 50,000 km above the surface is 60,000 km.
Using the formula, we can calculate the gravitational field strength as follows:
g = GM/r^2
g = (G * M) / (60,000 km)^2
g = (6.67 x 10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2) * (5.97 x 10^24 kg) / (60,000,000 m)^2
g ≈ 1.44 m/s^2
Therefore, the strength of Tehar's gravitational field at a height of 50,000 km above its surface is approximately 1.44 m/s^2.
Learn more about gravity here:
https://brainly.com/question/31321801
#SPJ11