A plaintiff who knows there is a substantial danger associated with certain conduct and goes ahead with the dangerous activity anyway gives the tortfeasor the defense of assumption of the risk.
What is assumption of the risk?
Assumption of risk is a defense in tort law, more specifically an affirmative defense, that limits or prevents a plaintiff from recovering damages from a negligent tortfeasor if the defendant can show that the plaintiff voluntarily and knowingly accepted the risks at issue that were associated with the risky activity they were engaging in at the time of their injury. "Primary" assumption of risk happens when the plaintiff is aware of a specific risk and voluntarily accepts it through words or actions, absolving the defendant of its duty of care.
Know more about assumption of the risk - brainly.com/question/21897362
#SPJ4
who said he smelled a rat because he feared a strong national government would be created and refused to attend the convention?
Patrick Henry expressed his deep mistrust of the secretive proceedings with the now-famous phrase, "I smell a rat!"
Later on, he served as both a representative in the First Continental Congress and as Governor of Virginia. The most well-known quote attributed to Henry is likely "give me power or give me death," which he uttered in a speech here to Virginia Convention in 1775.
Patrick Henry was the sixth and first governor of Virginia (1776–1799). (1784-1786). Following the Revolutionary War, William openly embraced anti-federalism. Henry and other Pro governments protested the 1787 U.S. Constitution's ratification because it established a powerful central authority.
Without Patrick Henry, the American Revolution, Independence, and the United States of America might never have taken place. Henry, a supporter of religious liberty, worked to stop the introduction of slaves and is regarded as the real author of both the Bill of Rights.
Learn more about Patrick henry here:
https://brainly.com/question/2386551
#SPJ4
which of the following types of searches may be unlawful. search incident to lawful arrest. search of minors. search when consent is given. search under plain view.
A search may be considered unlawful if it violates an individual's Fourth Amendment rights, which protect citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.
A "search incident to lawful arrest" is generally considered a lawful search as long as it is performed within the scope of the arrest and is reasonable in scope.
A search of minors, however, may be considered unlawful if it is conducted without a warrant, probable cause, or the consent of a parent or guardian.
A search performed with consent is generally considered lawful, as long as the consent is freely and voluntarily given.
A "search under plain view" is also generally considered lawful as long as the item in plain view is in an area where the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy, and the officer has a lawful right to be present in that area.
However, it's important to note that these types of searches are subject to various legal interpretations and limitations, and the ultimate determination of the lawfulness of a search will depend on the specific circumstances of each case.
Learn more about search here:
https://brainly.com/question/29610536
#SPJ4
libertarian governments have sought to censor political speech by stifling dissent in their countries.A. TRUEB. FALSE
It is False that libertarian governments have sought to censor political speech by stifling dissent in their countries.
The American Libertarian Party defines libertarianism as the support for a government that receives its funding willingly and is only responsible for defending its citizens against coercion and violence. A political theory known as libertarianism upholds liberty as a fundamental principle. By emphasising the rule of law, pluralism, cosmopolitanism, cooperation, civil and political rights, bodily autonomy, free association, free trade, freedom of expression, freedom of choice, freedom of movement, individualism, and voluntary association, libertarians aim to maximise autonomy and political freedom and minimise the state's encroachment on and violations of individual liberties. Anarchists, especially social anarchists, as well as more broadly libertarian communists/Marxists and libertarian socialists were among the anti-authoritarian and anti-state socialists who gave rise to libertarianism.
learn more about libertians here:
https://brainly.com/question/3836058
#SPJ4
in soldano v. o'daniels, the court re-examined the common-law rule of nonliability for not taking affirmative action to save someone from peril. the court considered which of the following factors with respect to imposing duties for affirmative action by third parties?
In Soldano v. O'Daniels, the court re-examined the common-law rule of nonliability for not taking affirmation action to save someone from peril. The court considered Moral guilt associated with defendant's actions and policies to prevent future harm.
As the Supreme Court noted, part of the reluctance of the law to impose liability for violations other than misdemeanors is due to the difficulty of setting standards and making rules enforceable. . (Tarasov v. University of California Regents, Many citizens just don't want to get involved. No rule should be enacted that requires citizens to open their homes to strangers to call for urgent help. The imposition of liability for such refusal is limited to facilities that are open to the public during business hours and locations within facilities that are normally open, thus exposing innocent citizens to possible attacks by the Good Samaritan. Do not expose to in general. Also, simply claiming an "emergency" situation by a stranger does not create an obligation to use an accessible phone. This is because obligations apply only when there is clearly communicated imminent risk of bodily harm.
For more information on California see:
https://brainly.com/question/30050163
#SPJ4
the beneficial owner is a resident of within the meaning of the income tax treaty between the united states and that country
The beneficial owner is a resident of within the meaning of the income tax treaty between the United States and that country. This statement is false.
What is a beneficial owner?
Legally speaking, even though the legal title to a piece of property belongs to someone else, that person is nevertheless considered the property's "beneficial owner" for purposes of equity. The state's legislative laws governing interest or title transfer apply to the beneficial owner. This frequently occurs when there are implied trustee duties from the legal title owner to the beneficial owner. A person who benefits from ownership even while the property's title is held by someone else is known as a beneficial owner.
Know more about income tax - brainly.com/question/26316390
#SPJ4
Which amendment does scenario 4 involve and is it being violated or not?
Mapp v. Ohio was one of the most significant Fourth Amendment rulings of the Warren Court (1961). The court ruled in this instance that evidence gathered in an unconstitutional manner must be subject to the exclusionary rule.
What is Fourth Amendment?People are shielded from arbitrary government searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. However, the Fourth Amendment only protects against legal searches and seizures that are deemed to be unjustified. No one shall violate the people's right to be secure in their homes, possessions, papers, and effects against arbitrary searches and seizures, and no warrants shall be issued except upon probable cause that is established by oath or affirmation and that specifically describes the location to be searched as well as the people or things to be seized.
To learn more about Fourth Amendment click,
https://brainly.com/question/17104412
#SPJ1
which of the following conditions is not taken under consideration by congress when determining whether an area is ripe for federal legislation?
A Brief Introduction to Federal Law
In order to become law, a bill must be introduced in Congress. The President must sign a measure for it to become law, or Congress must pass it over the President's veto. The new statute is made public in three different ways when a bill becomes a law: as slip laws, session laws, and codes.
A slip law is the earliest recognized publishing of a statute. A slip law is an independent copy of a specific law.
Codes are collections of current, permanent laws organized thematically. They group relevant legislation together and add revisions to the current topical groupings. The United States Code is a collection of federal law codes.
To learn more about Federal Law the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/28498485
#SPJ4
If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. -James Madison, Federalist Paper No. 51
Which of the following supports Madison's belief that internal and external controls on government are necessary?
Attorneys pay a federal judge in exchange for favorable rulings.
What is meant by Attorney?a person who is authorized to act on behalf of another: You can appoint an attorney to represent you. Also, look. prosecutor in charge
The fact that an individual must successfully pass a bar exam and become a member of a state bar association to be considered an attorney.
In the United States, for instance, the term "advocate" refers to any lawyer who has passed the bar exam and is authorized to practice law in a particular jurisdiction. While some lawyers are able to perform the duties of lawyers, not all lawyers can act as lawyers.
A court practitioner licensed by the state to defend a client or prosecute individuals accused of breaking the law is also a definition of an attorney-at-law. Even though they are not synonyms, the terms "attorney" and "lawyer" are frequently used interchangeably in the United States due to their similarity.
To know more about Attorneys, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10775722
#SPJ4
Madison believed that internal and external controls on government were necessary because he believed that human nature is flawed and that power corrupts. He believed that without checks and balances, those in positions of power would abuse their authority and that this could lead to the erosion of individual rights and freedoms.
Write in detail about Federalist Paper No. 51.
In Federalist Paper No. 51, Madison famously wrote that "If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary." This statement underscores Madison's belief that, since humans are not angels and therefore susceptible to corruption, it is necessary to have both internal controls, such as a system of checks and balances among different branches of government, and external controls, such as the ability of the people to elect their leaders and hold them accountable.
Hence, the answer is, Madison's belief that internal and external controls on government are necessary was based on his understanding of human nature and the need to protect individual rights and freedoms from the abuse of power by those in government.
To learn more about Federalist Paper No. 51, follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/29700268
#SPJ1
vinny decides to sue allison. to begin the suit, vinny must file a complaint. a complaint should contain group of answer choices a statement indicating the key evidence behind the suit. a motion for summary judgment. a motion for judgment n.o.v.
Vinny decides to sue Allison. To begin the suit, Vinny must file a complaint. A complaint should contain a. a statement of the basis for the court's jurisdiction.
A complaint is any formal legal document that sets out the facts and legal reasons (see: cause of action) that the filing party or parties (the plaintiff(s)) believe are sufficient to support a claim against the party
Parties against whom the claim is brought (the defendant(s)), entitling the plaintiff(s) to a remedy (either money damages or injunctive relief).
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), which govern civil litigation in United States courts, state that a civil action begins with the filing or service of a pleading known as a complaint.
The same name is used for the same pleading in civil court rules in states that have absorbed the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
To know more about complaint:
https://brainly.com/question/29218010
#SPJ4
Correct question:
Vinny decides to sue Allison. To begin the suit, Vinny must file a complaint. A complaint should contain
a. a statement of the basis for the court's jurisdiction.
b. a statement indicating the key evidence behind the suit.
c. a motion for judgment n.o.v.
d. a motion for summary judgment.
What is the purpose of a face page for criminal justice report writing? How could face pages may differ from agency to agency?
The purpose of a face page is that it contains blocks where the officer enters basic information, such as the incident date, time, and location; the names and biographical information of a victim, witness, or suspect; the type of crime committed and the corresponding state statute number; and more.
What is the type of writing in criminal justice?Criminal justice report writing plays a central role in the field. The officer writes the arrest, crime, incident, and evidence reports, and they compose social media posts, community outreach posters, and internal memos. Like everyone else, they also communicate using electronic correspondence, including emails and texts
The dominant writing style in a criminal justice document narrative is narration.
Learn more about officer, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28486188
#SPJ1
if the fair debt collection act prohibits these actions, why do you think the debt collectors in the story were using the tactics anyway?
If the fair debt collection act prohibits these actions, the debt collectors in the story were using the tactics anyway to recover their debts by force.
What is debt collection act?
The fair debt collection activities act is a consumer protection amendment to the consumer credit protection act that creates legal protection from unfair debt collection practices. The statute's stated objectives are to stop unfair debt collection methods, to encourage fair debt collection, and to give customers a way to challenge and validate debt information to assure the veracity of the information. The Act specifies fines and other consequences for violations of the Act, establishes guidelines for how debt collectors may conduct their business, and outlines consumers' rights when interacting with debt collectors. On rare occasions, it coincides with the fair credit reporting act.
Know more about debt collection act - brainly.com/question/29629153
#SPJ4
Nga wants to shoot photos inside a friend's home, then make the photos available for commercial use. Before proceeding with this plan, what should Nga do?
A. Nothing, this plan is fine as is
B. She will transfer copyright to the images to the homeowner
C. She can have the homeowner sign a model release
D. She will have a the homeowner sign a property release
Nga would have to have the homeowner sign a model release. Option C
What is she supposed to do?When taking photographs inside someone else's home, it's important to obtain permission from the individuals who will be recognizable in the photos. This is to ensure that they are aware of and agree to the intended use of the images, including any commercial use.
Obtaining a model release from the individuals who will be recognizable in the photos would be a step in the right direction to obtain their permission and protect their rights. In addition, Nga should also be respectful of the homeowner's property and obtain their permission to take photos inside their home, which can be done through a property release.
Read more on homeowners here:https://brainly.com/question/25671585
#SPJ1
Margo and Bruce have an agreement in which Margo will paint the entire first floor of Bruce's house for $5,000. As it turns out, Bruce cannot afford to have the whole first floor painted. Margo and Bruce decide that instead of the entire first floor, Margo will paint the living room and dining room only for $2,500. They put the original contract into a paper shredder and enter into another contract indicating the new terms. This is an example of a(n) _____.
This is an example of a modification or amendment to a contract. In contracts, it's common for the original terms and conditions to change due to various reasons.
When this happens, the parties involved can agree to modify or amendment the contract to reflect the new terms and conditions. In the scenario described, Margo and Bruce had an agreement for Margo to paint the entire first floor of Bruce's house for $5,000, but due to Bruce's inability to afford the cost, they decided to reduce the scope of the project to painting the living room and dining room only for $2,500. To reflect the change, they shredded the original contract and entered into another contract indicating the new terms. This demonstrates how contracts can be altered to suit the changing needs and circumstances of the parties involved. However, it's important to note that modifying a contract can have legal consequences, so it's advisable to consult with a lawyer before making any changes to a contract.
Learn more about amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ4
Duties of the Supreme Court justices have developed from
Duties of the Supreme Court justices have developed from laws and through traditions.
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW" - These words, written over the main entrance to the Supreme Court Building, express the Supreme Court of the United States' ultimate responsibility.
The Court is the highest tribunal in the country for all matters and conflicts arising under the United States Constitution or statutes.
As the final arbitrator of the law, the Court is tasked with assuring the American people of the promise of equal justice under law, and so serves as the Constitution's custodian and translator.
The Supreme Court is made up of the Chief Justice of the United States and as many Associate Justices as Congress determines. The current number of Associate Justices is eight (28 U. S. C.)
To know more about Supreme Court:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
Lynn transfers land having a $50,000 adjusted basis, an $80,000 FMV, and $10,000 cash to Allied Corporation in exchange for 100% of Allied's stock. The corporation assumes the $70,000 mortgage on the land. Which of the following statements is correct?
A) Lynn recognizes no gain and the stock basis is $60,000.
B) Lynn recognizes a $10,000 gain and the stock basis is $60,000.
C) Lynn recognizes no gain and the stock basis is $50,000.
D) Lynn recognizes a $10,000 gain and the stock basis is zero
B) Lynn recognizes a $10,000 gain and the stock basis is $60,000.
Lynn exchanged the land for stock in this transaction, so the $50,000 adjusted basis of the land is carried over to the stock. The stock has a fair market value of $80,000, and Lynn received $10,000 in cash as part of the transaction, so the stock's basis is $50,000 + $10,000 = $60,000.
The corporation assumed a $70,000 mortgage, but this has no effect on Lynn's stock basis.
Lynn made a profit of $80,000 - $50,000 = $30,000 on the sale of the land. The $10,000 cash received in the transaction, on the other hand, reduces the gain to $30,000 - $10,000 = $10,000, which Lynn must recognize for tax purposes.
The correct statement is "B) Lynn recognizes a $10,000 gain and the stock basis is $60,000."
To learn more about stock.
https://brainly.com/question/28663581
#SPJ4
below are the reduced augmented matrices corresponding with 3x3 systems of equations. determine the type of solutions to each corresponding system of equations
Using the Guass Jordan approach, the augmented matrix is resolved by conducting rows operations. The identity matrix is represented in this case by a portion of the augmented matrix.
First, convert the linear equation system into an augmented matrix. Step 2: To get a leading 1 in the first row, use simple row operations. Step 3: To acquire zeroes below the leading 1, use simple row operations. Step 4: To get a leading 1 in the second row and second column, use basic row operations. This indicates that there will always be a single solution with x=5 and y=4 for whatever value of z. The augmented matrix therefore has an endless number of solutions. As a result, the system can be solved in an endless number of ways.
To learn more about matrix click the link below:
brainly.com/question/28180105
#SPJ4
The complete question is: Below Are The Reduced Augmented Matrices Corresponding With 3 X 3 Systems Of Equations. Determine The Type Of Solutions To Each Corresponding System Of Equations -57 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Select An Answer 1 3 5 6 Si 0 0 1 0 0 1 Select An Answer > 3 5 0 Ri 0 5 37 0 1 -6 5 0 0 0 0 Select An Answer
________ consists of investigating, analyzing, evaluating, and interpreting information to solve a legal issue or case.
Critical legal thinking is the answer for the blank Critical legal thinking
consists of researching, analyzing, evaluating, and interpreting information to solve legal problems or cases.
Critical legal thinking is defined as: “The process of identifying a legal question, determining relevant facts, applying applicable law, and reaching a conclusion that answers the legal question at hand. ,
law to conclusions that answer the legal questions of the issue at hand that apply.
Critical Legal Studies (CLS) is a theory that argues that law is inevitably entwined with social issues, notably that law has inherent social biases. Proponents of CLS believe that laws support the interests of those who make them.
For more information on inherent see:
https://brainly.com/question/28539862
#SPJ4
Based on previous court rulings, which of the following scenarios would most likely violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?A. Police can't use a fake warrant to enter a woman’s home and then arrest her for possessing obscene materialsB. A state law criminalizes intermarriage between white and black citizensC. A school district didn't allows students of two religions, but not students from a third, to use auditoriums for group prayer and meditationD. A city ordinance didn't prevents protests from civil rights groups
The equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment would most likely be violated if a state statute made inter-racial marriage illegal for white and black individuals.
What is equal protection clause?The first section of the United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment contains the Equal Protection Clause. The paragraph states that "nor shall any State... deny to any Person within its Jurisdiction the equal protection of the Laws." It came into force in 1868. A state is compelled under equal protection to govern impartially rather than making judgements about people based simply on characteristics that have no bearing on a justifiable governmental goal. The equal protection clause is therefore essential for upholding civil rights. The government is prohibited from enacting laws or adopting official measures that differ in how they treat individuals in identical situations or groups of individuals under the equal protection clause of the constitution.
To learn more about Equal Protection Clause click,
https://brainly.com/question/25079139
#SPJ4
What amendments did Plessy v Ferguson violate?
A significant 1896 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court known as Plessy v. Ferguson established racial segregation as constitutional under the "separate but equal" principle.
The incident that gave rise to the case occurred in 1892 when Homer Plessy, an African American train passenger, refused to sit in a car designated for Black people.
The Supreme Court found that legislation that "implies only a juridical distinction" between white people and Black people was not unconstitutional, rejecting Plessy's claim that his constitutional rights were violated.
As a result, discriminatory Jim Crow laws and distinct public spaces depending on Democrats consolidated control of state legislatures throughout the region when the Compromise of 1877 caused the removal of federal soldiers from the South, essentially bringing an end to Reconstruction.
To learn more about Plessy v Ferguson the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/12846797
#SPJ4
What principle permits the copying of a work in certain circumstances, generally private, educational, research, or editorial use?
A. fair use
B. free use
C. public use
D. exempt use
Fair use, principle permits the copying of a work in certain circumstances, generally private, educational, research, or editorial use. Thus, option (a) is correct.
What is research?By using data from earlier studies and events, “research” refers to the process of developing new concepts. Utilizing first-hand, reliable sources that have already been printed on a comparable topic Journals, publications, demographic information, and historical events, for instance, are based on these sources.
According to the copyright act, was the work are the patent no one can copy to the published the work as without permission on the owner of the research. The copyright law, was the imposed on the educational, video, audio, research, journal, article, report, book, name, and the other significant was the included. It was the fair use in the right.
As a result, the significant of the research, are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on research, here:
https://brainly.com/question/18723483
#SPJ1
If a state gave its residents preference in obtaining work at the state's utility provider, this would likely violate which of the following Constitutional clauses?
Answer: Privileges and Immunities Clause
If a state gave its residents preference in obtaining work at the state's utility provider, it would likely violate the dormant Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.
The dormant Commerce Clause prohibits states from enacting laws that unduly burden or discriminate against interstate commerce.
This is because such a preference would discriminate against non-residents of the state who may be equally or better qualified for the job, and it would interfere with the free flow of commerce across state lines by favoring in-state workers over those from other states.
The dormant Commerce Clause is a legal doctrine that is derived from the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.
The Commerce Clause grants the United States Congress the power to regulate commerce among the several states. The dormant Commerce Clause, on the other hand, prohibits states from enacting laws that unduly burden or discriminate against interstate commerce, even in the absence of federal regulation.
This means that a state cannot enact laws that place an unreasonable burden on or discriminate against out-of-state businesses or activities, or that favor in-state businesses or activities over out-of-state ones.
The purpose of the dormant Commerce Clause is to promote the free flow of commerce across state lines, prevent economic protectionism, and ensure a level playing field for all businesses operating in the United States.
To know more about Dormant commerce clause refer to-
brainly.com/question/29976079#
#SPJ11
explain the meaning of section 377 of the penal code for animal
Answer:
377. Unnatural offences. —Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with 1[imprisonment for life], or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. Explanation.
What should a photographer do before using a building in a commercial photograph?
A. apply to the local government for a permit to shoot the building
B. ensure no people are visible in the photograph
C. determine whether the building is protected by copyright
D. make sure the photo was taken during daylight hours
Answer:
C. determine whether the building is protected by copyright.
Not all state courts are courts of record true or false?
The above statement that not all state courts are courts of record is true.
What is a court of record?
A court of record is a court that maintains a permanent and official record of its proceedings. The record serves as evidence of the proceedings and may be used in later legal proceedings. In some states, all courts are considered to be courts of record, while in other states, only certain courts, such as trial courts, are considered to be courts of record.
It is important to note that the definition of a court of record and the designation of which courts are considered to be courts of record can vary from state to state, and it is important to consult the laws of a specific state to determine which courts are considered to be courts of record.
To know more about Courts, check out:
https://brainly.com/question/29619376
#SPJ1
The framework presented to understand American politics is a set of interrelated actors and influences that operate in which of the following interconnected realms?
The framework presented to understand American politics is a set of interrelated factors and influences that operate in structural factors, political linkages, and governmental sectors.
What is the foundation of the American political system?
The chairman, who serves as both the head of state and the head of government, Congress, and the bar all share powers typically reserved for the public government, and the civil government and state governments concertedly exercise sovereignty in the United States, which is a indigenous civil democracy. The United States is more meetly described as a indigenous civil democracy, while constantly being called a republic. The civil popular democracy type of governance is established under the Constitution.
Know more about political system- brainly.com/question/30106491
#SPJ4
For photographers, what is an advantage of rights-managed licensing?
A. A single image can be sold to multiple buyers at the same time
B. a single license may sell for thousands of dollars
C. The license to an image never expires
D. The photographer can revoke a license at any time for any reason
A copyright license known as "rights-managed," or "RM," permits the user to use a photograph under the license's guidelines.
What is copyright?
A copyright is a sort of intellectual property that, typically for a certain period of time, grants its owner the sole authority to reproduce, transmit, adapt, exhibit, and perform a creative work.
The creative work could take the form of something musical, artistic, educational, or literary. A creative work's original expression of a concept is what copyright is meant to protect, not the idea itself.
A copyright may be susceptible to restrictions based on factors of public interest, such as the fair use doctrine in the US. In some jurisdictions, copyrighted works must be "fixed" in a physical form.
It is frequently created by a number of authors, known as rights holders, who each have a different set of permissions to use or distribute the work.
Learn more about copyright, here
https://brainly.com/question/22399852
#SPJ1
Why are some actions defined as crimes?
Answer:
Explanation:
Some actions are defined as crimes because they are seen as harmful to society, individuals, or the state. These actions are punished by the criminal justice system as a way to prevent further harm, promote public safety, and uphold the rule of law.
The laws that define crimes are typically enacted by a legislative body, such as a national or state government, and are based on the shared values and norms of the society in which they are enacted. For example, crimes such as murder, theft, and assault are widely recognized as harmful and prohibited by criminal law in many countries.
In addition to preventing harm, criminal laws serve to deter individuals from engaging in criminal behavior by imposing penalties, such as fines or imprisonment. By punishing those who engage in criminal behavior, the criminal justice system sends a message that such actions are unacceptable and will not be tolerated.
Overall, the definition of crimes is a reflection of the values and norms of a society, and the punishment of crimes serves as a means of promoting public safety and protecting the rights of individuals and the state.
In 1990, Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act, which required states to retrofit public areas to be wheelchair accessible, without offering any federal funds to pay for it. This is an example of which of the following?
Correct Answer(s)
-an unfunded mandate
-federal preemption
-coercive federalism
Incorrect Answer(s)
-a categorical grant
-a block grant
The Americans with Disabilities Act prevents discrimination and guarantees job opportunities for people with disabilities. It is an example of coercive federalism.
In 1990, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was enacted into law. A civil rights statute known as the Americans with Disabilities Act forbids discrimination against people with disabilities in all aspects of social life, including employment, education, transport, and all governmental and private locations that are accessible to the general public. Making sure that people with disability have the same opportunities and rights as everyone else is the goal of the legislation. A phase of American federalism known as coercive federalism started in the late 1960s. It is distinguished by a significant increase in the federal government's power in comparison to the states, as well as by the federal government's ability to supersede state authority and impose federal policies on the states. In spite of the fact that cooperative and the dual federalism are still present in the federal system, the phrase refers to the predominate pattern of federal-state relations, particularly in terms of policymaking.
Learn more about coercive federalism here
https://brainly.com/question/28902846
#SPJ4
According to Janice Radway, identify the legitimate functions romance novels serve in the lives of women readers.
Janice Radway is a cultural historian who has studied the reading habits and cultural significance of romance novels. According to Radway, romance novels serve several legitimate functions in the lives of women readers.
Radway argues that romance novels play an important cultural role in the lives of women, providing a source of comfort, support, and empowerment.
Explain how in detail romance novels play a role in women's lives.
First, romance novels provide an escape from the daily routine and difficulties of life, allowing women to imagine and experience a world of love, adventure, and passion.
Second, romance novels offer a way for women to explore and understand their own feelings, desires, and relationships. The novels often feature strong, empowered female characters who are able to assert their own needs and desires in their relationships, providing role models for readers.
Third, romance novels provide a source of community and support for women, as many readers form clubs and discussion groups to share their love of the genre and support each other in their personal lives.
Overall, Radway argues that romance novels play an important cultural role in the lives of women, providing a source of comfort, support, and empowerment.
To learn more about Janice Radway, follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/3133830
#SPJ4
For Judge Oh to be comfortable with natural law as a legal philosophy, which of the following would need to be true?
A) It is natural for injustice to develop.
B) Natural law would need to become more popular than it currently is.
C) He would need to have no legal philosophy at all.
D) The higher law is that the weaker members of society should be protected by the law.
E) Judge Oh would need to place more faith in a higher power.
Judge Oh would need to have no legal philosophy of law at all.
What is philosophy of law?The study and analysis of law, including its institutions, systems, and principles, is done by legal philosophy, also known as the philosophy of law. It focuses in particular on how the law interacts with other philosophical traditions and systems, including politics, political philosophy, economics, and ethics. A subfield of philosophy known as "law and philosophy" studies the nature of law and how it interacts with other ethical and political systems of thought. It poses inquiries like, "What is law?," "What are the standards for legal validity?," and "What is the connection between law and morality? The analytical and normative analysis of law and legal ideas is the subject of legal philosophy. This covers inquiries regarding the essence of law, basic inquiries about the "what is law?"
To learn more about philosophy of law click,
https://brainly.com/question/17521406
#SPJ4