The consumer intends to file a products liability action against the manufacturer in federal district court. Venue is proper in the d) District of State A, the District of State D, and the District of State B.
If all defendants are residents of the state in which the district is located, federal venue in civil cases is proper in I the district where any defendant resides, and (ii) the district where a major part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.
The District of State D is appropriate since the circumstances giving rise to the claim—use of the widget and injury—took place there. Significant events occurred in the District of State B as well (the sale).
Furthermore, venue is appropriate in other areas because the maker is presumed to dwell there. Corporations are presumed to live in any district where they are subject to personal jurisdiction over the action.
The manufacturer is subject to personal jurisdiction and thus deemed to reside in the District of State A (because its incorporation and principal place of business are there, subjecting it to general jurisdiction there), the District of State B (because it sold the widget from its store there, subjecting it to specific jurisdiction there with respect to the current action).
The District of State D (because it sold the widget from its store there, subjecting it to specific jurisdiction there with respect to the current action) (because the injury took place in State D, thus subjecting it to specific jurisdiction there with respect to the current action).
As a result, (B) and (C) are inaccurate. (A) is wrong because, while the manufacturer conducted business in the District of State C (due to the presence of its stores there), such activity would not expose the manufacturer to personal jurisdiction in this action since State C has no link with the consumer's injury.
As a result, the maker does not dwell in that district for venue reasons in the current action.
To know more about federal district court:
https://brainly.com/question/14457197
#SPJ4
What happened in Tennessee v. Garner?
Tennessee v. Garner case was well known for the police officers' deadly action on a suspect.
What is the conflict of Tennessee v. Garner?Tennessee v. Garner is considered a well-known civil case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that an officer in law enforcement could not use excessive force while following a running criminal in accordance with the 4th Amendment.
The Fourth Amendment's guarantee against unreasonable inspections was broken, and the court determined that the statute was unconstitutional as a result of the actions performed by the police on a person in name of inspection.
Learn more about Tennessee v. Garner, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30396322
#SPJ1
True/False? krugman advocated the idea that strategic trade policies can eliminate trade wars.
The given statement "Krugman advocated the idea that strategic trade policies can eliminate trade wars" is true because Paul Krugman argued that strategic trade policies could help reduce the incentive for other countries to engage in trade wars.
One way to do this is by imposing tariffs on imported goods to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. Governments can also provide subsidies to domestic industries to encourage their growth and competitiveness in the global market. By creating such strategic advantages, governments can encourage other countries to engage in fair trade practices rather than resorting to trade wars.
However, this view is not without controversy. Many economists have criticized strategic trade policies as potentially harmful to overall economic welfare.
To know more about tariffs go to
https://brainly.com/question/29775921
#SPJ4
Two landowners owned adjacent lots A and B. Both lots were located in State Red, which has a 20-year adverse possession statute. Thirty years ago, the lot A owner married and left State Red to reside in State Blue. The lot A owner did not return to view the property during her period of residence in State Blue. One year after the lot A owner left, the lot B owner built a driveway on his land. The driveway extended three feet over onto lot A. The lot B owner mistakenly believed that this three-foot strip of land was his property. The lot B owner regularly used the driveway and was continuing to use it when the lot A owner, having been widowed, recently returned to State Red. The lot A owner discovered the encroachment on her return.
What are the lot A owner's rights against the lot B owner?
The lot A owner discovered the encroachment on her return. C. The lot A owner has an action against the lot B owner, because the lot A owner had no knowledge of the lot B owner's encroachment.
For the required statutory term, the lot B owner had exclusive, continuous ownership of the three-foot strip. This possession was public and well-known; it was also hostile (adverse).
The misunderstanding made by the lot B owner about possession of the three-foot strip is not determinative. The owner of Lot B has held negatively since his actions look to the community to be a claim of ownership and he is not holding with the owner's approval.
As a result, (D) is inaccurate. (C) is wrong because the open and infamous nature of the lot B owner's possession was enough to notify the genuine owner that a possession adverse to her title had been taken. (B) is an inaccurate legal statement; there is no such presumption.
To know more about encroachment:
https://brainly.com/question/29414312
#SPJ4
Correct question:
Two landowners owned adjacent lots A and B. Both lots were located in State Red, which has a 20-year adverse possession statute. Thirty years ago, the lot A owner married and left State Red to reside in State Blue. The lot A owner did not return to view the property during her period of residence in State Blue. One year after the lot A owner left, the lot B owner built a driveway on his land. The driveway extended three feet over onto lot A. The lot B owner mistakenly believed that this three-foot strip of land was his property. The lot B owner regularly used the driveway and was continuing to use it when the lot A owner, having been widowed, recently returned to State Red. The lot A owner discovered the encroachment on her return.
What are the lot A owner's rights against the lot B owner?
A. The lot A owner has no action against the lot B owner, because the lot B owner's title to the three-foot strip has been established by adverse possession.
B. The lot A owner has no action against the lot B owner, because her prolonged absence from State Red establishes a presumption of abandonment of her rights in the property.
C. The lot A owner has an action against the lot B owner, because the lot A owner had no knowledge of the lot B owner's encroachment.
D. The lot A owner has an action against the lot B owner, because the lot B owner mistakenly thought he owned the three-foot strip.
authoritarian governments have ______person or a ________ people in charge.
The correct option is D ; one, none, Authoritarian governments have one person or a none people in charge.
Authoritarian = Government leadership controls all elements of citizens' economic, social, and political life; power is concentrated in the hands of one or a few individuals; opposition to the government is prohibited and frequently harshly punished. Democratic = The people have sovereignty.
Authoritarian. A government in which one person or group wields ultimate control. Dictatorship. Characteristics. Absolute authority; unlimited powers; most prevalent type of control throughout history; major challenger to constitutional democracy; power obtained via bloodshed.
Learn more about Authoritarian governments
https://brainly.com/question/5347127
#SPJ4
Full Question ;
Authoritarian governments have__person or a__people in charge.
(A)two, one
(B)one, few
(C)three, three
(D)one, none
What is a federalism system of government?
Federalism is defined as a hierarchical system of government under which two levels of government exercises.
Federalism is a merged and compound technique for government that joins a general government (the central or "regulatory" government) with nearby lawmaking bodies (normal, state, cantonal, provincial, or other sub-unit councils) in a singular political system, dividing the powers between the two. Federalism in the state of the art time was first embraced in a long time of states during the Old Swiss Alliance.
Federalism differs from confederalism, in which the overall level of government is subordinate to the common level, and from devolution inside a unitary state, in which the neighborhood level of government is subordinate to the general level. It tends to the central design in the pathway of regional compromise or segment, restricted on the less planned side by confederalism and on the more organized side by devolution inside a unitary state.
To know more about federalism,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/8305583
#SPJ4
A gang member determined that he needed to avenge a recent shooting of his friend by killing a member of the rival gang responsible for the shooting. He drank heavily to build up his courage and then went to t eh home of the rival with a loaded gun and knocked on the door. When the rival opened the door, the gang member pointed the gun at the rival and pulled the trigger. However, due to being intoxicated, he had forgotten to release the safety, so the gun did not discharge. He was easily disarmed by the rival and arrested by the police. At his trial, he testified that he was so intoxicated that he did not remember anything that happened at the rival's house.
If the gang member's testimony is believed, what is the most serious crime of which the defendant may be convicted?
The gang member's testimony is believed, then most serious crime of that may be convicted is Attempted Murder.
The most serious crime of which the defendant may be convicted depends on the specific laws and circumstances of the case, as well as the decision of the judge or jury. However, if the gang member's evidence that he was so intoxicated that he didn't recall anything that happened at the competitor's residence is believed, he could be convicted of attempted murder or attempted manslaughter because his acts show the desire to kill the rival. The fact that the gun did not discharge, on the other hand, may be taken into account and result in a lesser charge or a reduced punishment. The court must finally decide the proper charges and sentencing based on the facts given.
For such more question on gang:
https://brainly.com/question/30633240
#SPJ4
State legislatures are the primary locus of ____________, which is the power to make laws in furtherance of the public health, safety, welfare, and morality.
The police power, which is the authority to enact laws to promote the public's health, safety, welfare, and morality, is primarily vested in state legislatures.
The primary responsibility of the police is to safeguard the public by detecting and preventing crime. The police have both common law and legislative authority to carry out this duty, which has been established in common law (precedents set by court decisions).
Laws governing equal rights and human rights must be compatible with the use of police authority. Each police officer is in charge of making sure their use of authority is proper, reasonable, and required.
Three categories can be used to classify police powers:
the ability to look into crimes - This includes a variety of authorities to gather information necessary to identify suspects and support a fair and efficient trial for them.the ability to stop crime - This includes a variety of authority to preserve public peace, stop antisocial behaviour, and control known criminals or suspects.the ability to "dispose" of criminal cases - Police can use these powers to resolve criminal cases outside of court or to charge suspects so that they can be brought to justice.Learn more about " police powers " to visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/2863065
#SPJ4
Which model of the criminal justice system describes the expectation of efficiency?
The criminal justice model describes the expectation of an efficient criminal justice system.
The criminal justice model is a detail oriented rules around certain core values and principles of law. Various jurists proposed various models of justice of which the criminal justice model is considered having the best efficiency. It is system based on values and principles, where fair train and process of justice is entertained. The criminal justice model contains of further two models (1)the due process of law and (2)the crime control model. The due process of law help in extracting justice between the parties while the crime control model helps in punishing and preventing further crimes. All these work together in the society to ensure a healthy and fair environment to the victims as well as the accused.
To know more about "justice model" visit-
brainly.com/question/19523841
#SPJ4
federalism is a mixture of which two extreme forms of political organization?
Federalism is a mixture of the following extreme forms of political organization: Confederacy and Unitary National Government
Federalism is a political system that combines characteristics of a strong central authority with a system of sovereign states or regions. It is a hybrid of two extreme forms of political organization: unitary government, in which all power is concentrated in a single central government, and confederation, in which most power is distributed to individual states or regions with limited central authority. Power is distributed between the central government and the states in a federal system, with each level of government having its own set of duties and responsibilities. The United States is an example of a federal form of government in which authority is shared between the central government and individual states.
For such more question on Federalism:
https://brainly.com/question/30623884
#SPJ4
which amendment to the constitution guarantees due process and equal protection rights to all citizens?
The Fourteenth Amendment Additional Rights and Equal Protection All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are considered citizens of the United States and the state in which they live. As a result, D is the right answer.
No State shall enact or carry out legislation restricting the rights or immunities of United States citizens; no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; and no State shall deny equal protection of the laws to any person within its jurisdiction.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are considered citizens of the United States and the state in which they live.
Learn more about Amendment
https://brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ4
Full Question ;
which amendment to the constitution guarantees due process and equal protection rights to all citizens?
13 Amendment
10 Amendment
11 Amendment
14 Amendment
What is Expo Facto law?
An Ex Post Facto Law may be understood as the law that is subject to change with a given change in the legal consequences of an action that was committed by the individual under question.
An ex post facto law can be generally taken into interpretation for better understanding as the laws that change with a given change in actions committed by a defendant, which is well before the law was actually brought into an enactment, so that a decision can be made. Thus, it often leads to formation or change in the existing laws.
Learn more about laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/2498364
#SPJ4
complete question
What is an ex post facto law?
What is estate at will?
An estate at will is a type of tenancy or property ownership arrangement in which the tenant or occupant has the right to possess and use the property for an indefinite period of time, but the agreement can be terminated by either the tenant or the landlord at any time without prior notice.
In other words, an estate at will is a flexible and informal arrangement in which the renter is allowed to stay on the property for as long as both sides are willing to allow, but the agreement has no set end date or duration. This sort of tenancy can be created by express agreement between the landlord and the tenant, or it might occur as a result of the parties' acts or conduct.
Because the estate at will can be terminated at any time by either party, it offers no security or stability to the renter.
For such more question on estate
https://brainly.com/question/1534216
#SPJ4
The writer of Hebrews is [ Select ] ["unknown", "Peter", "John", "Paul"] , and the book of Hebrews was written to emphasize the superiority of [ Select ] ["good works", "Roman law", "righteousness", "Jesus Christ"] over the Old Covenant of Law.
In the above condition, it may be stated that “The Hebrews” was written by Paul with an intention to lay an emphasis on the superiority of Jesus Christ over the Old Covenant of Law. Therefore, the options 1-C and 2-C hold true.
''The Hebrews'' has always been remembered as the most accurate and relevant document for the governance of Christianity, and the religious ideologies that tend to revolve around the same. It may also be stated that the ''The Hebrews” is very much true to what it mentions and intends to portray to its readers in a large part.
Learn more about ''The Hebrews'' here:
https://brainly.com/question/842535
#SPJ4
Answer: Answer is below <3
Explanation:
The writer of the Hebrews is Paul.
The book of Hebrews was written to emphasize the superiority of Jesus Christ over the Old Covenant of Law.
TRUE OR FALSE those uniform state laws that have been adopted by individual states were first written by congress.
The uniform state laws that the various states have adopted were not initially written by Congress.
What are Uniform Laws?
It is possible for state legislatures to implement uniform laws after carefully drafting model legislation. State legislatures have the option of rejecting them, adopting them as a whole, or adopting them with modifications. The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, formerly known as the Uniform Law Commission (ULC), is responsible for creating uniform laws. Renowned attorneys, judges, politicians, and law academics are members of ULC. They want to encourage state law consistency. Over 250 Uniform Laws have been created by ULC since its foundation in 1892. Similar to uniform laws, model acts, and model codes may be offered by any person or group, including the American Bar Association, the American Law Institute, and ULC.
To learn more about Uniform Laws visit;
https://brainly.com/question/15060097
#SPJ4
which of the following reflects the attitude exhibited by muslim rulers toward jews, christians, and zoroastrians as long as they accepted islam's political rule?
Muslim rulers generally exhibited a tolerant attitude towards Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians as long as they accepted Islam's political rule.
This attitude was based on the Islamic concept of dhimma, which granted non-Muslims living in Islamic territories certain rights and protections in exchange for payment of a poll tax (jizya) and their acceptance of Muslim political authority.
Under the dhimma system, non-Muslims were allowed to practice their own religion and follow their own laws and customs. They were also guaranteed protection from outside aggression and were allowed to engage in commerce and trade.
However, there were certain restrictions placed on non-Muslims, such as prohibitions on proselytizing or criticizing Islam, and they were generally regarded as second-class citizens.
Overall, the treatment of non-Muslims under Muslim rule varied depending on the specific ruler, time period, and local circumstances, but the general attitude towards them was one of tolerance as long as they accepted Muslim political rule and paid the jizya tax.
To know more about Muslim rulers here:
https://brainly.com/question/28961033
#SPJ4
what is the 21st amendment simplified
The 21st Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified on December 5, 1933 and it repealed the 18th Amendment, which had established nationwide Prohibition of alcohol.
To put it simply, the 21st Amendment makes it permissible for individuals and corporations to once again manufacture, transport, sell, and consume alcoholic beverages. This amendment granted each state the ability to regulate and control the sale and distribution of alcohol inside its borders, resulting in a plethora of alcohol-related rules and regulations that differ from state to state.
The 21st Amendment is notable because it, for the first time in US history, reversed a previous constitutional amendment (the 18th Amendment). It also marked the end of Prohibition, a period in which the manufacture, sale, and consumption of alcoholic beverages were forbidden throughout the United States.
For such more question on Constitution:
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
there are some key policy measures that make globalization sustainable and encouraging further cross-border integration. which one of the following is not one of these key policy measures?
Out of the provided options of alternatives, it is to be considered that democracy is not a key policy measure that makes the concept of globalization to sustain and encourage cross-border integration. Therefore, the option C holds true.
Globalization is ideally taken into assumption by the layman as a concept that develops trade and business relationships between at least two countries. The form of governance, such as democracy, has no relation whatsoever with making globalization as a sustainable development within a country or an economy.
Learn more about globalization here:
https://brainly.com/question/15283031
#SPJ4
Complete question
There are some key policy measures that make globalization sustainable and encouraging further cross-border integration. which one of the following is not one of these key policy measures?
Options
A.Countries with sound economic policies will be more successful in the global economy, encouraging further opening and cross border integration.
B.Governments need to put in place good governance, competitive markets, and property rights, and assist in the fight against corruption.
C. Adaptation of democracy as the ideal form of governance
Mayra offers to sell her home to Hanna for "about $100,000 plus closing costs." Hanna accepts Mayra's offer. Later, a dispute arises over the precise dollar amount of the purchase price. How will a court most likely resolve this dispute?
A) The court will require Hanna to pay the average of her price and Mayra's price.
B) The court will determine that Hanna pay only the figures mentioned in the contract.
C) The court will determine a reasonable price to be paid by Hanna.
D) The court will appoint a licensed real estate appraiser to determine the price to be paid by Hanna.
E) The court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract.
The court will most likely resolve the dispute by determining a reasonable price to be paid by Hanna.
Hence, the correct option is C.
A court will most likely resolve the dispute over the purchase price of the home by interpreting the agreement between Mayra and Hanna. If the agreement is determined to be ambiguous, the court will consider the circumstances surrounding the formation of the agreement, such as the negotiations leading up to it and the parties' subsequent conduct, in order to determine their intent.
In the case of "about $100,000 plus closing costs," a court would likely interpret this as meaning that the purchase price was intended to be $100,000 plus an amount to cover closing costs, but that the exact dollar amount was not specified. In such a case, the court would likely require the parties to provide evidence of the actual closing costs incurred, and then determine the final purchase price based on that evidence.
To know more about reasonable price here:
https://brainly.com/question/23160540
#SPJ4
to grant a motion for a(n) notwithstanding the verdict (judgment non obstante verdicto), a judge must, as a matter of law, determine that the trial did not produce sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict.
A judge must find that the trial did not yield enough evidence to support the jury's verdict to grant an application for a judgment.
A judgment despite the decision (JNOV) is one in which the preliminary appointed authority rejects the jury's choice after it has been reached and gives the horrible party a judgment without requesting another preliminary.
Except for the planning of a preliminary, a judgment despite the decision (JNOV) and a coordinated decision are very comparative. Assuming the adjudicator accepts that the jury twisted the law in arriving at its choice or that no sensible jury might have arrived at the jury's decision in light of the realities presented at the preliminary, the adjudicator will give a JNOV.
Learn more about judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV):
https://brainly.com/question/29223053
#SPJ4
Sujin must send an email about longer working hours and salary increase to all the employees who work in her organization. Which organizing strategy should she use in conveying this message?
She should answer all the questions the employees are likely to have in the email.
She should end the email by giving importance to the message and not the employees.
She should place the good news at the end of the message and the bad news in the middle of the message.
She should not present the bad news in a positive way, as it might confuse the employees.
She should answer all the questions the employees are likely to have in the email is organizing strategy should she use in conveying this message.
Option A is correct.
A strategic plan that outlines how your company will allocate resources (such as time, money, and inventory) to support all of its activities is known as an organizational strategy. It is typically developed by the leadership team. Examples of general business activities include: acquiring or creating stock to satisfy market demand.
In strategic management, what exactly is organizing?The management function of organizing involves allocating human resources and creating an organizational structure to ensure the achievement of goals. The framework within which effort is coordinated is the organization's structure.
Learn more about organisement:
brainly.com/question/30464548
#SPJ1
Why doesn't the United States have a unitary form of government?
A federation is a good illustration of a governing structure. The federalist form of government established by the U.S. Constitution divides authorities between the 50 state governments and the federal government in Washington, D.C.
Citizens can anticipate a clear division of authority and prompt crisis management under a unitary system. Another drawback of unitary systems is their tendency to become overly centralized, disconnected from local demands, and authoritarian in nature.
The phrase "Federal Government" is frequently used to refer to the National Government in the United States, while the organization of the 50 state governments is unitary, not federal. An association of independent states is known as a confederation.
To know more about the unitary system, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30583594
#SPJ4
What was the purpose of the policy of containment after World War II?
The main purpose of the policy of containment after the World War II was to limit the spread of soviet power and communist ideology.
The concept of communalism refers to a set of beliefs and values that define the division between states(people, groups of people, communities). Containment was a geopolitical strategic foreign policy pursued by the united states during the cold war to prevent the spread of communism after the end of World War II. The idea was to make other countries prosperous enough to avoid the temptation of communism.
To know more about "World War II" visit-
brainly.com/question/15570403
#SPJ4
Uses the Internet to resolve disputes
The resolution of disputes with the assistance of organizations that offer dispute-resolution services via the Internet.
When outside help is needed to resolve a dispute, there are a number of Web sites that offer _________. _____ may be best for resolving small- to medium-sized business liability claims, which may not be worth the expense of litigation or traditional ADR
The resolution of disputes with the assistance of organizations that offer dispute-resolution services via the Internet. When outside help is needed to resolve a dispute, there are a number of Web sites that offer online dispute resolution(ODR) may be best for resolving small- to medium-sized business liability claims, which may not be worth the expense of litigation or traditional ADR.
ODR is a digital space, where public facing disputes can be resolved by the parties through the usage of internet. While ODR refers to wide case of alternative dispute resolution that takes advantage of the availability and development of internet excess. ODR is one of the type of alternate dispute resolution which solves disputes between two parties before going to the court. It is considered as an easier and faster way to solve solve civil disputes without the involvement of the jury and court proceedings. ODR is slightly different from ADR in the usage of internet, it solves disputes outside of court with the help of technology and alternate dispute resolution.
To know more about "dispute-resolution" visit-
brainly.com/question/24660107
#SPJ4
how long after irs approves refund does it get deposited
After the IRS approves a tax refund, the time it takes for the refund to be deposited into your bank account or sent to you via mail depends on how you requested to receive your refund and how you filed your tax return.
If you opted for direct deposit, it typically takes about 1-3 business days for the funds to be deposited into your bank account after the IRS approves your refund. However, if you requested a paper check, it can take several weeks for the check to be mailed to you. In some cases, the IRS may also issue a prepaid debit card instead of a paper check.
It's important to note that the timing of your tax refund can also be affected by a number of other factors, such as the accuracy and completeness of your tax return, any errors or discrepancies that need to be resolved, and the volume of returns that the IRS is processing at any given time. If you have questions about the status of your tax refund, you can check the IRS "Where's My Refund?" tool or contact the IRS directly for assistance.
To know more about refund click here:
brainly.com/question/8646298
#SPJ4
To show breach of duty, a plaintiff may rely on evidence of any of the following except:A. Res ipsa loquiturB. Violation of a statuteC. A "Good Samaritan" lawD. Custom or usage
To show breach of duty, a plaintiff may rely on evidence of any but not a "Good Samaritan" law.
Hence, the correct option is C.
A "Good Samaritan" law has nothing to do with breach of duty, it is a statute that exempts licensed doctors and nurses, who can voluntarily render emergency treatments, due to liability of ordinary negligence in an emergency or clash. In order to prove the breach of duty it must be show facts of case, and (based on these facts) that the defendant acted unreasonably. Proof of what happened may be established by either direct or circumstantial evidence. A Good Samaritan law is a legal protection provided to those who helped the victim of any accident from legal interventions.
To know more about "Good Samaritan" visit-
brainly.com/question/21908960
#SPJ4
A party that wants the Supreme Court to review a lower court ruling musta. present a non obstante veredicto.b. file a petition for a writ of certiorari.c. file a petition for a voir dire.d. present a motion to dismiss
A party that wants the Supreme Court to review a lower court ruling must file a petition for a writ of certiorari.
Hence the correct option is b.
A writ is a written order by the Supreme Court or the High Court that commands the lower courts or tribunals for constitutional remedies for the Indian citizens if their fundamental rights which are enshrined in the Constitution are violated.
In the literal sense, certiorari means 'to be informed'. This writ is issued by a higher court to a tribunal or a lower court to either squash the order to the lower court/tribunal or to transfer the case to the higher court.
To know more about writs
https://brainly.com/question/14561854?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
a courtâs subject-matter jurisdiction may be limited by all of the following except
a. The subject of a lawsuit
b. The sum in controversy
c. Whether the proceeding is a trial or an appeal
d. The prior experience of the court in deciding similar disputes
Out of the choices of alternatives provided above, it may be stated that the prior experience of the court in making decisions on similar disputes is an exception by which the subject-matter jurisdiction of a court may be limited. Therefore, the option D holds true.
The jurisdiction of a court is a similar concept that determines the powers and the extent up to which the powers and authorities of a court are limited to. The subject of a lawsuit, trials and appeals, and the sum involves in the case are essential points that determine the jurisdiction of a court.
Learn more about jurisdiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4
at the heart of the secondary market for treasury bills are 23 financial institutions designated by the federal reserve bank as , who make a market in treasury bills by buying and selling for their own account and trading for their customers.
Answer: Your welcome!
Explanation:
These 23 financial institutions are known as Primary Dealers. Primary Dealers are responsible for providing liquidity in the Treasury market by participating in all auctions of Treasury securities and trading in the secondary market. They are also expected to provide market intelligence to the Federal Reserve, which uses this data to inform its monetary policy decisions. By participating in the Treasury market, Primary Dealers facilitate the sale of Treasury securities to investors, thus providing the government with the funds needed to finance its operations.
the fourteenth amendment’s equal protection clause requires that everyone be treated equally. (true or false)
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Hope it helps:)
governments can protect consumers from unsafe products by issuing a limit or a ban on such products. (True or False)
It is highly appropriate and totally correct to be mentioning that the government maintains consumer protection by issuing a limit or a ban on products that may be unsafe. Therefore, the aforementioned statement is to be held as true.
Consumer protection may be taken into interpretation as the primary social welfare goal of the state and national governments. When government is able to identify the safety in products not being up to the mark, there may be a ban on the products thus involved thereunder.
Learn more about consumer protection here:
https://brainly.com/question/19054234
#SPJ4
Cmplete question
governments can protect consumers from unsafe products by issuing a limit or a ban on products. (True or False)