9. What is the value of x if the quadrilateral is a rhombus? 15 5x 4x+3​

Answer:

x= -3

Step-by-step explanation:

(2x/3)-2=-4

Add 2 to both sides

2x/3=-2

multiply both sides by 3

2x=-6

divide both sides by 2

x= -3

Answer:

x = -3

Step-by-step explanation:

2x/3 - 2 = -4

Add 2 to both sides.

2x/3 = -2

Multiply both sides by 3/2.

x = -2 * 3/2

x = -3

Answer:

-14 x²

Step-by-step explanation:

10 x² - 24 x² = -14 x²

The answer is 14

if you multiply both P(x) and Q(x), the third part becomes 14x², so the coefficient of x² becomes 14.

Answered by GAUTHMATH

Answer:

That transformation that happened was B rotation since b is rotated 180 degrees from A

Hope This Helps!!!

Answer: You will never reach a sum of 2. You would need infinitely many terms to sum up.

============================================================

Explanation:

We have this sequence

1, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, 1/64, ...

which is geometric with the following properties

Notice how we multiply each term by 1/2 to get the next term. Eg: (1/4)*(1/2) = 1/8 or (1/16)*(1/2) = 1/32.

Since r = 0.5 is between -1 and 1, i.e. -1 < r < 1 is true, this means that adding infinite terms of this form will get us to approach some finite sum which we'll call S. This is because the new terms added on get smaller and smaller.

That infinite sum is

S = a/(1-r)

S = 1/(1-0.5)

S = 1/0.5

S = 2

So if we keep going with that pattern 1+1/2+1/4+... and do so forever, then we'll reach a sum of 2. However, we cannot go on forever since it's asking when we'll reach that specific sum. In other words, your teacher wants finitely many terms to be added.

In short, we'll never actually reach the sum 2 itself. We'll just get closer and closer.

Here's a list of partial sums

We can see that we're getting closer to 2, but we'll never actually get there. We'd need to add infinitely many terms to get to exactly 2.

Answer:

the first wheel ever built

Answer:

The first wheel ever built

Step-by-step explanation

(*) Sorry for my late answer but I hope this helps others that are looking for this.

100% in the test :)

Answer:

[tex] { - 3}^{2} + (4 + 7)(2) \\ = - 9 + 22 \\ = 13[/tex]

Answer:

D. 12/18 = 16/24

Step-by-step explanation:

The method we must go about to solve this is finding the constant. For A, we can solve it by doing 10 divided by 8 (which is 1.25) and then 40 divided by 1.25 to see if it is 36. Alternatively, we can do 10 divided by 8 and then 40 divided by 36 to see if the constant is the same. It's up to you!

My answers:

A. No (constant varies)

B. No (constant varies)

C. No (constant varies)

D. Yes! Constant is 0.75

How to solve for D:

12/16 = 0.75

18/0.75 = 24       OR          18/24 = 0.75

I hope this helps! Please don't hesitate to reach out with more questions!

Hello!

10/40 = 8/36 ?

10 × 36 = 40 × 8

360 = 40 × 8

360 ≠ 320 => 10/40 ≠ 8/36

8/18 = 6/16 ?

8 × 16 = 18 × 6

128 = 18 × 6

128 ≠ 108 => 8/18 ≠ 6/16

9/15 = 44/50 ?

9 × 50 = 15 × 44

450 = 15 × 44

450 ≠ 660 => 9/15 ≠ 44/50

12/18 = 16/24 ?

12 × 24 = 18 × 16

288 = 18 × 16

288 = 288 => 12/18 = 16/24

Good luck! :)

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  p(x) = x³ -3x²+4x -2

Step-by-step explanation:

When the polynomial has real coefficients, the complex roots come in conjugate pairs. You are given one root as 1+i, so there is another that is 1-i.

Each root r gives rise to a factor (x -r). Then the three roots tell you the factorization is ...

  p(x) = (x -1)(x -(1+i))(x -(1-i))

The last two factors can be recognized as the factors of the difference of squares:

  ((x -1) +i)((x -1) -i) = (x -1)² -i²

  = (x² -2x +1) -(-1) = x² -2x +2

Now the whole polynomial can be seen to be ...

  p(x) = (x -1)(x² -2x +2) = x(x² -2x +2) -1(x² -2x +2)

  p(x) = x³ -2x² +2x -x² +2x -2 . . . . eliminate parentheses

  p(x) = x³ -3x²+4x -2

Given:

The number 55 is attached to a two-digit number to its left and the formed 4-digit number is divisible by 24.

To find:

The 2-digit numbers.

Solution:

Let the two digit number be [tex]ab[/tex]. Then the 4 digit number will be [tex]55ab[/tex].

We know that the number [tex]55ab[/tex] lies in the range 5500 to 5599.

Now,

[tex]5500=229\times 24+4[/tex]

It means, [tex]5500-4=5496[/tex] is divisible by 24. So, the numbers lie in the range 5500 to 5599 and divisible by 24 are:

[tex]5496+24=5520[/tex]

[tex]5520+24=5544[/tex]

[tex]5544+24=5568[/tex]

[tex]5568+24=5592[/tex]

Therefore, the possible 2-digit numbers are 20, 44, 68, 92.

Answer:

The probability is 1/2500. (1/50)*(1/50)

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

hope u like it.......

Answer:

Standard deviation, means, skewness and kurtosis.

Step-by-step explanation:

Two normal curves may be same but they have different means, standard deviation and skewness. There can be different standard deviation for two curves and there is difference in skewness.

Answer:

Joe's wife must drive at a rate of 45km/hour.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that Joe leaves home and bikes at a speed of 30km/hour. Joe's wife leaves home five minutes later by car, and we want to determine her speed in order for her to catch up to Joe in 10 minutes.

Since Joe bikes at a speed of 30km/hour, he bikes at the equivalent rate of 0.5km/min.

Then after five minutes, when his wife leaves, Joe is 5(0.5) or 2.5 km from the house. He will still be traveling at a rate of 0.5km/min, so his distance from the house can be given by:

[tex]2.5+0.5t[/tex]

Where t represents the time in minutes after his wife left the house.

And since we want to catch up in 10 minutes, Joe's distance from the house 10 minutes after his wife left will be:

[tex]2.5+0.5(10)=7.5\text{ km}[/tex]

Let s represent the wife's speed in km/min. So, her speed times 10 minutes must total 7.5 km:

[tex]10s=7.5[/tex]

Solve for s:

[tex]\displaystye s=0.75\text{ km/min}[/tex]

Thus, Joe's wife must drive at a rate of 0.75km/min, or 45km/hour.

Answer:

G(x)=1/x+15

Step-by-step explanation:

.

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  x = 30°

Step-by-step explanation:

The lines will be parallel if and only if the sum of the marked angles is 180°:

  4x +2x = 180°

  6x = 180° . . . . . collect terms

  x = 30° . . . . . . . divide by 6

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm sure he was making a joke at the expense of people who rely on mathematics rather than common sense. It is funny, but then Twain was a remarkably funny author..

The problem is that the comparison is apt using some sort of proportion, but it is absurd to think that the land holding the river would also shrink a proportional amount.  

The river reached a minimum (presumably) in 1875 by cutting out all the loops that were there in 1700. The Mississippi was then a straight line from it's beginning to its delta on the gulf of Mexico. It could not get any shorter. Still, Twain managed to get laughs with his whimsical humor.

Thanks for posting. This made my evening.

Answer:

[tex] \frac{1}{12} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \frac{2}{9} \div \frac{8}{3} \\ = \: \frac{1}{12}[/tex]

So, if you divide 2/9 by 1/12, you'll get 8/3

Answered by GAUTHMATH

Answer:

66

Step-by-step explanation:

Add both of the angles given together

43 + 23

Answer:

A FORMULA is an expression that uses variables to state a rule.

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation: Because Donald asks a more broad and open question which people could give different answers too

Given:

Net income = $19,090

Assets at the beginning of the year = $209,000.

Assets at the end of the year total = $264,000.

To find:

The return on assets.

Solution:

Formula used:

[tex]\text{Return of assets}=\dfrac{\text{Net income}}{\text{Average of assets at the beginning and at the end}}[/tex]

Using the above formula, we get

[tex]\text{Return of assets}=\dfrac{19090}{\dfrac{20900+264000}{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\text{Return of assets}=\dfrac{19090}{\dfrac{473000}{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\text{Return of assets}=\dfrac{19090}{236500}[/tex]

[tex]\text{Return of assets}\approx 0.0807[/tex]

The percentage form of 0.0807 is 8.07%.

Therefore, the return on assets is 8.07%.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a.) it's just mean, variance

so here it's just 12,6.25

b.) For the x bar thing just divide the variance by the number of people (mean stay the same)

the variance is then (2.5²/34)= .1838

which makes it (12,.1838)

c.) here we don't use x bar (and so it's normal (12,2.5²))

p(11.6) = (11.6-12)/(2.5)= -.16 = .4364

p(12.4)= (12.4-12)/2.5 = .16= .5636

.5636-.4364= .1272

d.) here we use x bar because it's asking for an average so it's normal (12, .1838)

same deal

p(11.6)=(11.6-12)/√.1838= -.93295= .1762

p(12.4)= (12.4-12)/√.1838= .93295= .8238

.8238-.1762= .6476

d.) no because they're probably IID

f.) It's average so here we use x bar

q1 is just the 25th percentile

the 25th percentile is -.6745

-.6745=(x-12)/(√.1838)= 11.711

q3 is the 75th percentile

.6745=(x-12)/√.1838

x=12.289

The interquartile range is just the difference between the two

12.289-11.711= .5784

Answer:

[tex]\text{Perimeter: }48\:\mathrm{m},\\\text{Area: }84\:\mathrm{m^2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of a triangle with side lengths [tex]a[/tex], [tex]b[/tex], and [tex]c[/tex] is given by:

[tex]A=\sqrt{s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)}[/tex], where [tex]s=\frac{a+b+c}{2}[/tex]

Substituting [tex]a=21, b=17, c=10[/tex], we have:

[tex]A=\sqrt{24(24-21)(24-17)(24-10)},\\A=\sqrt{24(3)(7)(14)},\\A=\sqrt{7,084},\\A=\boxed{84\:\mathrm{m^2}}[/tex]

The perimeter of a polygon is given by the sum of its sides. Since the triangle has sides 10, 17, and 21, its perimeter is [tex]10+17+21=\boxed{48\:\mathrm{m}}[/tex].

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Probability of defective televisions : Now, If two televisions are randomly​ selected, then the probability that both televisions work. Hence, the probability that both televisions work is 0.5289 . Hence, the probability at least one of the two televisions does not​ work is 0.4711.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Combination of 3 teachers out of 12:

Combination of 4 students out of 43:

Total combinations: