Answer:
(1) knows dad (2) hiding. (3) fish. (4) think about. (5) started. (6) had crashed, in middle. (7) excited, bright sunny day.
Explanation:
Am I wrong ;>
the word "unreasonable" has only 1 prefix and 1 suffix.
Select one:
1. True
2 False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
prefix= un+reasonable
suffix=unreason+able
hope it helps you
Mark me as brainlist
____ is a paradox that is represented in these lines.
2. If someone told you, "I don't expect you to know what cool people wear, but I can tell you that green jeans are not it." what is his or her explicit message?
Green jeans are not cool and fashionable. You are not cool.
Green jeans are cool and fashionable.
You should be wearing blue jeans.
An explicit message is directly stated.
Answer:
Green jeans are not cool and fashionable. You are not cool.
Answer:
Green jeans are not cool and fashionable
Explanation:
How does paragraph 2 of "The Chance of a Lifetime" contribute to the development of the plot? Use details from the text in your response. I need help in 30 mins PLS
Answer:
orms of volunteering can be applied to the different roles that people take within ... volunteer motivations and looks to develop a typology of sports volunteers. ... diversity for their effectiveness as a policy tool and for government support. ... International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 4, 2, 187–200 . ... text, however. For .
Help me pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Answer:
okpuoooiiiiiii800099009999999999999
Change the verb into its noun form. Be sure to type the complete word, not just the suffix.
rely_____
Answer:
reliance
Explanation:
reliance
It is important in an academic argument to have a lot of textual evidence from secondary sources. A. Completely true—you can never have enough quotes, especially from experts in the field. B. Mostly true—you have to include some of your own words, but the ideas of experts are really what are important. C. Mostly false—you have to have an occasional quote to support your ideas, but it should mostly be your own words. D. Completely false—secondary source textual evidence is nothing more than plagiarism.
Answer:
C. Mostly false—you have to have an occasional quote to support your ideas, but it should mostly be your own words.
Explanation:
You should keep quotes and source material to 10-25% of your paper.
Reread paragraph 1 of the story. Which statement BEST
describes Alison's point of view about babysitting the
Murray twins?
Answer:
She's not looking forward to it because she thinks the twins are mischievous.
Look at these word parts.
omin from Latin, meaning "omen," an occurrence that indicates a future event
-ous characterized by
Based on these word parts, what is the correct definition of ominous?
yearning, longing
unhappy, wretched
threatening, foreboding
stormy, dark
Answer:
threatening, foreboding is correct.
Read the excerpt from “The New Colossus" by Emma Lazarus:
From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame."
What type of figurative language did Laz use in the excerpt?
•Onomatopoeia
•Simile
•Alliteration
•Personification
Answer:
•Personification.
Explanation:
Personification is the giving of human attributes to non-living things. This means that non-animate things, ideas, etc. are given human characteristics making them seem alive.
In the given lines from her poem "The New Colossus," Emma Lazarus used the figurative language of personification. Here, she describes the Statue of Liberty as a living mother, having "mild eyes". This personification is also seen in the use of the pronoun "her" in "her beacon-hand", referring to the lamp/ torch that the statue holds.
Thus, the correct answer is personification.
PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!! 90 POINTS!
Write a well-organized argument letter of three or four paragraphs on an issue that is meaningful to you.
Answer:
You must find out - what's meaningful to you? What about big problems in today's society, such as abortion, immigration, or even the wall Trump is establishing?
When you pick your topic, just go at it. Here's mine
Explanation:
Throughout history, there have been many problems that have striked pure interest in me. However, in particular, I would say that I feel rather passionate about immigration.
The issue of immigration has been in the limelight for a long period of time now. The most affected region being the United States of America which forms the destination of most immigrants. Immigration generally entails people moving from their native lands to other destinations where they end up settling. There are various reasons as to why people decide to leave their land and move to other regions. Some of which include search for employment, political uproars, and natural disasters just to mention but a few.
The immigrants who get into another country are broadly classified into two groups that are the legal and illegal immigrants. Legal immigrants are those seek the authorization from the immigration department of the state’s government on entering the nation. That way, they possess legal documents and become just like the citizens of that nation.
Illegal immigrants on the other hand are people who enter the borders of a nation without proper immigration procedures and choose to remain in that country without permission. Therefore the problem of immigration is usually caused by the illegal immigrants and not the legal ones. This paper is therefore a synthesis of the issue of immigration especially in the United States where it is most prevalent.
Just feel free to expand! Make yourself empowered.
Hope this helps.
should religious belief influence law,five paragraph argument.
Explanation:
Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.
But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."
A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".
But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.
Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.
1. Which refers to the spreading of information, ideas or rumor?
A. Assumption
C. conclusion
B. Bias
D. propaganda
2. The learners cheered when their teacher announced her new plan. Which of the
underlined words helps us detect bias?
A. Announced
C. learners
B. Cheered
D. plan
3. Which of the following means showing a preference for one side over another?
A. Advertisement
C. conclusion
B. Bias
D. judgment
4. “Lucky Me is the best instant mami”. What propaganda device is used?
A. Glittering Generality
C. Testimonial
B. Name Calling
D. transfer
5. Ina a newspaper advertisement, a message is appealing to ordinary people. What type
of propaganda technique is used?
A. Bandwagon
C. plain folks
B. Name calling
D. transfer
6. Actress Marian Rivera promotes Kopiko Café Blanca. Which propaganda technique is
used?
A. Bandwagon
C. loaded words
B. Name calling
D. testimonial
7. What propaganda technique is used in the following statement? "Ilocanos are stingy"
A. Bandwagon
C. loaded words
B. Name calling
D. testimonial
8. In what type of media can we find propaganda?
A. Billboards and Newspapers
C. radio and television
B. Magazines and movies
D. all of the above
Answer:
1-a
2-b
3-d
4-c
5-d
6-a
Explanation:
If you fraternize with your friends that means that you __ with them A) disagree B) argue C) feed D) associate
Please real answers only
Answer:
D
Explanation:
to fraternize means to associate
Aaron, can you tell the class what your weekly activities are?
What is the summary of chapter 22 of two roads?
Answer:
In Chapter 22, Cal has a brief encounter with an instructor who, “despite the fact that he is an Indian himself” writes Cal "a demerit for typical Indian laziness" (235-236).
Explanation:
im gonna explain:
In Chapter 22, Cal has a brief encounter with an instructor who, “despite the fact that he is an Indian himself” writes Cal "a demerit for typical Indian laziness" (235-236). Later in the chapter, Mr. O’Boyle demonstrates blatant racism when he asks Cal, “‘You like-um them shoes, Chief? You want buy-um?’” (241). These passages illustrates some of the prejudices held towards Indians, and some students may find it offensive. Encourage concerned students to process these experiences from Cal's perspective, using evidence from the text. Consider questions like: How do you think Cal feels about Mr. Handler and Mr. O’Boyle? Why do you think Cal points out that Mr. Handler is himself a North Carolina Cherokee? How might Handler's being Cherokee impact Cal's understanding of this situation? What does Cal’s reaction to Mr. O’Boyle’s mockery reveal about his experiences with these types of encounters?
comparison between my parents and little boy crying in no less than 350-400 words
plz help
and this is the correct answer and you can go for it
all the best
Can someone please help me i am confused
THIS IS SO HARD
HELP
GUYS
IMMA BOI WHO BORED
AND IN MATH CLASS
BBOISE
Answers:
It should be Headings
what happens after the other knight appears
Answer:
Explanation:
Help plss to what happens after the knight appears
4)_good friends.
a) They're
b) They are
c) Their
Answer:
they are
Explanation:
option b ....... they are
Part 2: Select the word that select the word that matches each part of speech - noun
A. Thanksgiving
b, and
C. exist
d. awesome
Answer:
Explanation:
A. Thanksgiving
Which background for my phone do you like better
The hands Or the flower
(I like other people’s opinion)
Flowers the flowers flowers flowers and flowers flowers flower
questions and answers black spot class 5
Answer:
I really don’t know what u mean by that may u explain?!
Explanation:
Question:
Read the following information to answer the given
questions
(1) A, B, C, D, E, F and G are playing cards sitting around a
circular table
(ii) D is not neighbour of C or E.
(iii) A is neighbour of B and C.
(iv) G, who is second to the left of D, is the neighbour of
E and F
Who is seating third left to F
Choose one
Answer:
tati na LA Ru uh yt sh9shsnjsuhddjks
What play does Hamlet want the players to perform?
Answer:
Hamlet requested the actors to perform the play The Murder of Gonzago because it would be the perfect opportunity for Hamlet to gauge Claudius's reaction to a ficticious murder tailored to echo the murder of King Hamlet.
Explanation:
Please give thanks to all my answers and please mark as brilliant and please follow me
Question 19 (Mandatory) (3 points)
Which sentence is most effective in establishing a professional, academie tone?
Did you get my e-mail?
Hey, can you answer me?
I look forward to your response.
Write me back ASAP
Plllzzzzz I have a time limit
Answer: I look forward to your response.
Have a good day
Helpppp plasss hello
Answer:
hey
Explanation:
which employment sector has the highest and the lowest number of workers?
Answer:
lowest is agriculture and the highest is education
Explanation:
hope it help
The employment sector that contains the maximum number of workers and the lowest number of workers would be as follows respectively.:
- Agriculture - Maximum Number of workers
- Education - Lowest number of workers
Agriculture is considered to be the primary sector and the majority of the population is engaged in it. Therefore, the maximum number of workers engaged in this very sector. While the least number of workers are involved in the education sector as there is a comparatively very low percentage of teachers are engaged in this sector and the least. Thus, the least number of workers are involved in the education sector.Learn more about 'Sectors of the Economy' here:
brainly.com/question/2551787
What literacy device is used in the warning that "they'd advertise " if they found out about a pair of Nobodies?
Answer:
The poem opens with an oxymoron - the speaker calls self Nobody
Explanation:
Which is a claim made by the author of “Drones Put Spying Eyes in the Sky”?
Answer:
I think it means that when the drones are in the sky they basically spy on u and possibly the person who is controlling the drone put a camera on it sorry tried my best hope I helped a little?
A claim made by the author of "Drones Put Spying Eyes in the Sky" is that Drones can monitor endangered species and track poachers.
A drone is a flying robot that does not require a pilot on board. The United States military has used drones and other unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for surveillance.
The basic rationale for putting spying drones in the skies is that Snitch believed that if the drone could spot the animals, it would expose the existence of any questionable characters nearby. If it did spy on him, he might alert a nearby park ranger. That armed ranger may then apprehend the would-be poacher and save the animals.
Thus, it can be said that a claim made by the author of "Drones Put Spying Eyes in the Sky" is that Drones can monitor endangered species and track poachers.
Learn more about drones, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30741818
#SPJ6